docs(workflow): codify the branch model — main / feature / release branches

Adopt GitHub Flow + release branches, replacing "everything straight to main
plus a tag" which caused the 1.4.2 pain (a fix had to be retro-fitted to the
released version, forcing a remote-tag delete + full re-upload).

- main: only long-lived branch, always deployable, accumulates the next version
- feature/<desc>: born from main, merged back when done
- release/vX.Y.Z: cut from main, tagged, installers built from the tag
- hotfixes land on the release branch AND are cherry-picked back to main so
  main never loses a fix
- end of lifecycle = retire the release branch (delete; or keep for long-term
  maintenance), no wholesale merge back — hotfixes already flowed
- explicitly no rebase of main, no release-branch-merge, no quick edits on main

Companion release checklist includes the upload lessons (PUT --http1.1) and the
replace-artifacts-by-deleting-the-tag catch.

Docs in docs/git-workflow.md (zh) and docs/git-workflow-en.md, linked from both
READMEs.
This commit is contained in:
JianFeeeee
2026-08-31 12:36:17 +08:00
parent 5b628b4d6f
commit 3806aaee03
4 changed files with 289 additions and 0 deletions

141
docs/git-workflow-en.md Normal file
View File

@ -0,0 +1,141 @@
# Git Branching Workflow
ModelRouter uses a **GitHub Flow + release-branch** model: `main` is the only
long-lived branch and is always deployable; new work branches off it as a
feature branch; each version gets its own release branch with a tag; hotfixes
land on the release branch and MUST flow back to `main`.
Goal: make "patching an already-released version during its support window" a
first-class operation, while `main` always contains every fix and stays
deployable.
## Branch roles
| Branch | Name | Lifetime | Purpose |
|---|---|---|---|
| Main | `main` | permanent | Only long-lived branch. Always deployable. Accumulates the next version. |
| Feature | `feature/<desc>` | short (dev → merge → delete) | New features / ordinary fixes. Born from `main`, merged back into `main`. |
| Release | `release/vX.Y.Z` | one version cycle | Cut from `main`, tagged for release. Version-specific hotfixes land here. |
## Change flow (important)
```
feature/foo ───────┐
main ──────────────── next version ──────►
│ │
│ cut │ cut
▼ ▼
release/v1.4.2 release/v1.4.3
│ │
tag: v1.4.2 tag: v1.4.3
│ │
hotfix ◄─────┘ hotfix ◄─────┘
│ │
└── cherry-pick back ──────────┘
```
### Key rules
1. **main is always deployable**: never leave half-done work on `main`.
Unfinished work lives on a feature branch.
2. **Features start from main and merge back**: `git checkout -b feature/xxx main`,
then `git merge --no-ff feature/xxx` (or squash) when done.
3. **Release = cut a release branch from main + tag**:
```bash
git checkout -b release/v1.4.2 main
git tag -a v1.4.2 -m "ModelRouter v1.4.2"
git push origin release/v1.4.2 v1.4.2
```
Build installers and upload the GitCode Release from this tag so the
published state is exactly reproducible.
4. **Only version-specific hotfixes go into a release branch during its
window**: new features always go to `main` for the next version, never into
an already-released branch (unless you deliberately ship a minor revision).
5. **Hotfixes MUST flow back to main**:
```bash
git checkout release/v1.4.2 # fix in the release branch
git commit -m "fix: ..."
git checkout main
git cherry-pick <hotfix-commit> # and into main
```
Most important rule: **main only moves forward and never loses fixes**. If a
hotfix never reaches main, the next release ships with the old bug.
### End of a version lifecycle
When the next version ships, the previous release branch retires:
- **Default: delete the remote release branch**
(`git push origin :release/v1.4.2`). All hotfixes were already
cherry-picked into main, so main contains everything; no merge needed.
- **Long-term maintenance** (e.g. an enterprise client pinned to an old
version): keep the branch, accept only security fixes, keep the
commit-then-cherry-pick loop.
## Explicit non-goals
- **Never rebase main**: main's history stays append-only; anyone pulling gets
directly usable history.
- **Release branches are not merged back wholesale**: hotfixes were already
cherry-picked; a whole-branch merge only creates conflicts with no benefit.
- **No "quick edit" directly on main**, even single-person: at minimum use
`feature/xxx → merge main` so history keeps its why-boundaries.
## Single vs multi person
- **Single** (this repo today): skip PRs — `git checkout -b feature/xxx` →
finish → merge back to main. Release branch + tag flow unchanged.
- **Multi / open source**: feature branches go through PR + Code Review,
maintainers merge; resolve conflicts on the feature branch, never on main.
## Commit message conventions
- `feat(...)`: new feature
- `fix(...)`: bug fix
- `chore(...)`: build / version / deps / non-code changes
- `docs(...)`: documentation
- `refactor(...)`: refactoring
- Scope in parens, e.g. `fix(adapters)`, `feat(webui)`, `chore(version)`
- One-line summary; expand with problem/root-cause/fix/verification when needed
## Release checklist (companion)
```bash
# 1. main is ready
git checkout main && git pull
# 2. cut release branch + tag
git checkout -b release/vX.Y.Z main
git tag -a vX.Y.Z -m "ModelRouter vX.Y.Z"
# 3. push branch + tag
git push origin release/vX.Y.Z
git push origin vX.Y.Z
# 4. build installers (core + GUI platforms)
make core-dist VERSION=X.Y.Z
# 5. create GitCode Release + upload
# https://gitcode.com/JianFeeeee/ModelRouter/releases
# upload MUST use PUT --http1.1, otherwise the OBS callback fails and the
# file never lands in the release; replacing artifacts = delete the tag
# (release disappears with it) then recreate.
```
## Why this model (background)
Before 2026-08 everything went straight to `main` plus a tag, which caused two
pain points:
1. After 1.4.2 shipped, a scheduler-scoring fix had to be added to the same
version — the only option was deleting the remote tag to clear the release
and re-uploading all installers. The published state was detached from code
history; "what exactly shipped" could not be traced.
2. No feature branches meant two independent efforts could not proceed in
parallel without colliding.
With release branches: the published state = `release/vX.Y.Z` branch +
`vX.Y.Z` tag, exactly reproducible; hotfixes have a clear landing spot; main
stays "latest + all fixes + deployable".
> 中文版见 [docs/git-workflow.md](git-workflow.md)。