mirror of
https://gitcode.com/JianFeeeee/ModelRouter.git
synced 2026-11-12 20:27:23 +00:00
生产现网发现(issue #1 排查):billing.rules 里一条指向 https://opencode.ai/inference/v1 的规则,在该源 base_url 变成 .../inference/openai/v1 之后匹配不到任何源;严格编译因此让**整个** profile 不生效 —— 账单恒 0、unpriced_reqs 涨到 3.7 万,唯一痕迹是一行启动日志。 - 严格编译失败时降级为 lenient:应用能匹配的规则,其余按 profile default; - 日志用 ERROR 点名**具体哪条 URL** 写错(新增 billing.UnmatchedRuleURLs), 并说明未匹配流量的记账去向; - 判据 TestBillingStaleRuleURLStillAppliesOtherRules:一条过期规则 + 一条有效 规则 ⇒ 有效规则必须仍然生效。
317 lines
12 KiB
Go
317 lines
12 KiB
Go
package billing
|
||
|
||
import (
|
||
"testing"
|
||
|
||
"llmsproxy/internal/config"
|
||
)
|
||
|
||
// The wildcard token rule must not blanket-mark every source as priced.
|
||
//
|
||
// Why this is a hazard and not a style question: priceFor() sets priced=true as
|
||
// soon as the request's SOURCE has an entry in the price table, and that flag
|
||
// is what keeps a request OUT of unpriced_reqs. A "*" rule is a model
|
||
// catalogue — it prices specific model ids wherever they come from — but
|
||
// compiling it into a {0,0,0} entry on all 21 sources made every model the
|
||
// catalogue does not list look "priced at zero". Paid providers (commandcode,
|
||
// alittokenplan, …) then stopped appearing in the unpriced warnings, which is
|
||
// exactly the silent zero-billing failure the plugin exists to surface.
|
||
func TestWildcardTokenRuleDoesNotMarkEverySourcePriced(t *testing.T) {
|
||
sources := []config.Source{
|
||
{Name: "free1", BaseURL: "https://free1.example.com/v1"},
|
||
{Name: "paid1", BaseURL: "https://paid1.example.com/v1"},
|
||
{Name: "paid2", BaseURL: "https://paid2.example.com/v1"},
|
||
}
|
||
profile := &config.BillingProfile{
|
||
ID: "p",
|
||
Rules: []config.BillingRule{
|
||
{URL: "https://free1.example.com/v1", Mode: "free"},
|
||
{
|
||
URL: "*", Mode: "token",
|
||
Models: map[string]config.BillingToken{
|
||
"only-catalogued-model": {Prompt: "1.00", Completion: "2.00"},
|
||
},
|
||
},
|
||
},
|
||
}
|
||
prices, err := Compile(profile, sources)
|
||
if err != nil {
|
||
t.Fatalf("compile: %v", err)
|
||
}
|
||
srcs := prices["sources"].(map[string]interface{})
|
||
|
||
// The explicitly free source keeps its entry (free is a deliberate 0).
|
||
if _, ok := srcs["free1"]; !ok {
|
||
t.Error("the explicit free rule lost its source entry")
|
||
}
|
||
// Paid sources must NOT be marked, or their unlisted models bill $0.
|
||
for _, name := range []string{"paid1", "paid2"} {
|
||
if _, ok := srcs[name]; ok {
|
||
t.Errorf("wildcard token rule marked %q as priced at 0 — its unlisted "+
|
||
"models will bill $0 instead of appearing as unpriced", name)
|
||
}
|
||
}
|
||
// The catalogue itself must still be present, or the rule prices nothing.
|
||
models := prices["models"].(map[string]interface{})
|
||
if _, ok := models["only-catalogued-model"]; !ok {
|
||
t.Error("the wildcard rule did not publish its model price")
|
||
}
|
||
}
|
||
|
||
// The inverse guard: a token rule for a SPECIFIC url still marks that source,
|
||
// because it genuinely declares pricing for the models served from it.
|
||
func TestSpecificURLTokenRuleStillMarksItsSource(t *testing.T) {
|
||
sources := []config.Source{
|
||
{Name: "mine", BaseURL: "https://mine.example.com/v1"},
|
||
{Name: "other", BaseURL: "https://other.example.com/v1"},
|
||
}
|
||
profile := &config.BillingProfile{
|
||
ID: "p",
|
||
Rules: []config.BillingRule{{
|
||
URL: "https://mine.example.com/v1", Mode: "token",
|
||
Models: map[string]config.BillingToken{
|
||
"m": {Prompt: "1.00", Completion: "2.00"},
|
||
},
|
||
}},
|
||
}
|
||
prices, err := Compile(profile, sources)
|
||
if err != nil {
|
||
t.Fatalf("compile: %v", err)
|
||
}
|
||
srcs := prices["sources"].(map[string]interface{})
|
||
if _, ok := srcs["mine"]; !ok {
|
||
t.Error("a specific-url token rule must still mark its own source priced")
|
||
}
|
||
if _, ok := srcs["other"]; ok {
|
||
t.Error("an unrelated source was marked priced by a specific-url rule")
|
||
}
|
||
}
|
||
|
||
// TestReasoningPriceIsOmittedUnlessSet pins the absence convention for the
|
||
// thinking-token rate.
|
||
//
|
||
// A rule that says nothing about reasoning must produce a price entry with NO
|
||
// reasoning_price key, so the billing plugin skips the repricing branch and
|
||
// bills thinking at the ordinary output rate — which is what every provider
|
||
// actually charges. Writing an explicit 0 instead would read as "thinking is
|
||
// free" and silently under-bill every request from that model.
|
||
func TestReasoningPriceIsOmittedUnlessSet(t *testing.T) {
|
||
sources := []config.Source{{Name: "up", BaseURL: "https://up.example/v1"}}
|
||
|
||
// Case 1: no reasoning declared → the key must not appear.
|
||
p1 := &config.BillingProfile{ID: "p", Rules: []config.BillingRule{{
|
||
URL: "https://up.example/v1", Mode: "token",
|
||
Models: map[string]config.BillingToken{
|
||
"m": {Prompt: "1.00", Completion: "2.00"},
|
||
},
|
||
}}}
|
||
prices, err := Compile(p1, sources)
|
||
if err != nil {
|
||
t.Fatal(err)
|
||
}
|
||
entry := prices["models"].(map[string]interface{})["m"].(map[string]interface{})
|
||
if _, present := entry["reasoning_price"]; present {
|
||
t.Errorf("reasoning_price present (%v) without a rule; the plugin would treat 0 as free",
|
||
entry["reasoning_price"])
|
||
}
|
||
|
||
// Case 2: declared → present, and converted to per-token like every other rate.
|
||
p2 := &config.BillingProfile{ID: "p", Rules: []config.BillingRule{{
|
||
URL: "https://up.example/v1", Mode: "token",
|
||
Models: map[string]config.BillingToken{
|
||
"m": {Prompt: "1.00", Completion: "2.00", Reasoning: "6.00"},
|
||
},
|
||
}}}
|
||
prices2, err := Compile(p2, sources)
|
||
if err != nil {
|
||
t.Fatal(err)
|
||
}
|
||
e2 := prices2["models"].(map[string]interface{})["m"].(map[string]interface{})
|
||
rp, ok := e2["reasoning_price"].(float64)
|
||
if !ok {
|
||
t.Fatalf("reasoning_price missing or wrong type: %#v", e2["reasoning_price"])
|
||
}
|
||
if rp != 6e-6 {
|
||
t.Errorf("reasoning_price = %v, want 6e-6 (USD per TOKEN)", rp)
|
||
}
|
||
// A malformed rate must be rejected, not silently ignored: an operator who
|
||
// typed "6 USD" expects either that value or an error, never a rule that
|
||
// looks applied and bills nothing.
|
||
p3 := &config.BillingProfile{ID: "p", Rules: []config.BillingRule{{
|
||
URL: "https://up.example/v1", Mode: "token",
|
||
Models: map[string]config.BillingToken{
|
||
"m": {Prompt: "1.00", Completion: "2.00", Reasoning: "six dollars"},
|
||
},
|
||
}}}
|
||
if _, err := Compile(p3, sources); err == nil {
|
||
t.Error("a non-numeric reasoning rate must fail the compile")
|
||
}
|
||
}
|
||
|
||
// TestLongContextStepCompiles pins the long-context step's two accepted forms
|
||
// and its rejection of a step that would silently do nothing.
|
||
//
|
||
// Providers publish both shapes — DeepSeek says "2x past 128k", OpenAI quotes
|
||
// an absolute "$3.00/M past 200k" — so both must compile. Neither may be
|
||
// missing: a step with no rate is a rule that LOOKS like it handles long
|
||
// context and does not, which under-bills without any visible sign.
|
||
func TestLongContextStepCompiles(t *testing.T) {
|
||
sources := []config.Source{{Name: "up", BaseURL: "https://up.example/v1"}}
|
||
|
||
compile := func(lc config.BillingLongContext) (map[string]interface{}, error) {
|
||
p := &config.BillingProfile{ID: "p", Rules: []config.BillingRule{{
|
||
URL: "https://up.example/v1", Mode: "token",
|
||
Models: map[string]config.BillingToken{
|
||
"m": {Prompt: "1.00", Completion: "2.00", LongContext: &lc},
|
||
},
|
||
}}}
|
||
prices, err := Compile(p, sources)
|
||
if err != nil {
|
||
return nil, err
|
||
}
|
||
e := prices["models"].(map[string]interface{})["m"].(map[string]interface{})
|
||
return e["long_context"].(map[string]interface{}), nil
|
||
}
|
||
|
||
// Absolute rate (OpenAI's published shape).
|
||
lc1, err := compile(config.BillingLongContext{Above: 200000, Prompt: "3.00"})
|
||
if err != nil {
|
||
t.Fatalf("absolute long_context rate rejected: %v", err)
|
||
}
|
||
if lc1["above"] != 200000 || lc1["prompt"] != 3e-6 {
|
||
t.Errorf("absolute step = %#v, want above=200000 prompt=3e-6", lc1)
|
||
}
|
||
|
||
// Multiplier (DeepSeek's shape): 2x of the 1.00/M base.
|
||
lc2, err := compile(config.BillingLongContext{Above: 128000, Multiplier: 2})
|
||
if err != nil {
|
||
t.Fatalf("multiplier long_context rejected: %v", err)
|
||
}
|
||
if lc2["prompt"] != 2e-6 {
|
||
t.Errorf("multiplier step = %#v, want prompt=2e-6", lc2)
|
||
}
|
||
|
||
// Both given: the absolute rate wins, because that is the number the
|
||
// provider quotes. Multiplying instead would produce a figure the operator
|
||
// never wrote.
|
||
lc3, err := compile(config.BillingLongContext{Above: 128000, Prompt: "5.00", Multiplier: 2})
|
||
if err != nil {
|
||
t.Fatal(err)
|
||
}
|
||
if lc3["prompt"] != 5e-6 {
|
||
t.Errorf("both given = %#v, want the quoted absolute rate 5e-6", lc3)
|
||
}
|
||
|
||
// Neither: a no-op step must fail, not compile into a rule that silently
|
||
// bills long context at the base rate.
|
||
if _, err := compile(config.BillingLongContext{Above: 128000}); err == nil {
|
||
t.Error("a step with neither prompt nor multiplier must be rejected")
|
||
}
|
||
// A zero threshold would make every request "long".
|
||
if _, err := compile(config.BillingLongContext{Above: 0, Multiplier: 2}); err == nil {
|
||
t.Error("above=0 must be rejected")
|
||
}
|
||
}
|
||
|
||
// A specific-URL token rule marks its source priced, but the entry must carry
|
||
// ONLY the "this source is priced" marker — not zero token prices.
|
||
//
|
||
// Why: `billing.lua`'s priceFor() applies the source dimension AFTER the model
|
||
// dimension and treats `sp.prompt ~= nil` as an override. A {prompt:0,
|
||
// completion:0} entry therefore zeroes the model price of every model the rule
|
||
// DOES list. The symptom is silent: cost is 0 while out.priced is true, so
|
||
// unpriced_reqs does not grow either (GitCode issue #1).
|
||
//
|
||
// The original test only asserted the KEY existed, which froze the broken shape
|
||
// into a contract; this asserts the entry CONTENT.
|
||
func TestSpecificURLTokenRuleSourceEntryHasNoZeroTokenPrices(t *testing.T) {
|
||
sources := []config.Source{{Name: "mine", BaseURL: "https://mine.example.com/v1"}}
|
||
profile := &config.BillingProfile{
|
||
ID: "p",
|
||
Rules: []config.BillingRule{{
|
||
URL: "https://mine.example.com/v1", Mode: "token",
|
||
Models: map[string]config.BillingToken{
|
||
"m": {Prompt: "0.15", Completion: "0.60"},
|
||
},
|
||
}},
|
||
}
|
||
prices, err := Compile(profile, sources)
|
||
if err != nil {
|
||
t.Fatalf("compile: %v", err)
|
||
}
|
||
entry, ok := prices["sources"].(map[string]interface{})["mine"].(map[string]interface{})
|
||
if !ok {
|
||
t.Fatal("a specific-url token rule must still mark its own source priced")
|
||
}
|
||
for _, key := range []string{"prompt", "completion"} {
|
||
if _, present := entry[key]; present {
|
||
t.Errorf("source entry carries %s=%v: priceFor() treats it as an override "+
|
||
"and zeroes the model price (issue #1)", key, entry[key])
|
||
}
|
||
}
|
||
// per_request: 0 is the marker itself: adding a flat fee must not change
|
||
// the total, and the key's presence is what tells the plugin "priced".
|
||
if v, present := entry["per_request"]; !present || v != 0.0 {
|
||
t.Errorf("source entry must carry per_request:0 as the priced marker, got %#v", entry)
|
||
}
|
||
// The model price must still be the real per-token value.
|
||
m, ok := prices["models"].(map[string]interface{})["m"].(map[string]interface{})
|
||
if !ok {
|
||
t.Fatal("model price missing")
|
||
}
|
||
if m["prompt"] != 0.15e-6 {
|
||
t.Errorf("model prompt price = %v, want 1.5e-7 per token", m["prompt"])
|
||
}
|
||
}
|
||
|
||
// free / subscription are DELIBERATE zeros: their source entries keep the
|
||
// zero token prices, because there the zero IS the statement.
|
||
func TestExplicitZeroModesKeepZeroTokenPrices(t *testing.T) {
|
||
for _, mode := range []string{"free", "subscription"} {
|
||
profile := &config.BillingProfile{ID: "p", Rules: []config.BillingRule{{
|
||
URL: "https://mine.example.com/v1", Mode: mode, Subscription: 10,
|
||
}}}
|
||
prices, err := Compile(profile, []config.Source{
|
||
{Name: "mine", BaseURL: "https://mine.example.com/v1"},
|
||
})
|
||
if err != nil {
|
||
t.Fatalf("%s compile: %v", mode, err)
|
||
}
|
||
entry, ok := prices["sources"].(map[string]interface{})["mine"].(map[string]interface{})
|
||
if !ok {
|
||
t.Fatalf("%s: source entry missing", mode)
|
||
}
|
||
for _, key := range []string{"prompt", "completion"} {
|
||
if v, present := entry[key]; !present || v != 0.0 {
|
||
t.Errorf("%s: entry[%s] = %v (present=%v), want an explicit 0.0",
|
||
mode, key, v, present)
|
||
}
|
||
}
|
||
}
|
||
}
|
||
|
||
// UnmatchedRuleURLs 是给调用方的"哪条规则写错了"清单:严格编译只会说
|
||
// "compile failed",而运维需要知道具体 URL;降级应用时也要能说明丢了什么。
|
||
func TestUnmatchedRuleURLs(t *testing.T) {
|
||
sources := []config.Source{{Name: "mine", BaseURL: "https://mine.example.com/v1"}}
|
||
profile := &config.BillingProfile{
|
||
ID: "p",
|
||
Rules: []config.BillingRule{
|
||
{URL: "https://mine.example.com/v1", Mode: "free"},
|
||
{URL: "https://stale.example.com/v1", Mode: "free"},
|
||
{URL: "*", Mode: "token", Models: map[string]config.BillingToken{
|
||
"m": {Prompt: "1", Completion: "1"},
|
||
}},
|
||
{URL: "https://mine.example.com/v1/", Mode: "free"}, // 尾斜杠归一后匹配
|
||
},
|
||
}
|
||
got := UnmatchedRuleURLs(profile, sources)
|
||
if len(got) != 1 || got[0] != "https://stale.example.com/v1" {
|
||
t.Fatalf("unmatched = %v, want only the stale URL (wildcard and trailing-slash "+
|
||
"variants must not be reported)", got)
|
||
}
|
||
if nil != UnmatchedRuleURLs(nil, sources) {
|
||
t.Error("nil profile must yield nil")
|
||
}
|
||
}
|