mirror of
https://gitcode.com/JianFeeeee/webui4frpc.git
synced 2026-10-03 07:34:00 +00:00
上一提交(5cdc052)只加了执行侧 owner 判定,实测仍然失败:从 .60(非 owner)
启动 owner 在 .30 的 portal,.30 的 worker 一直没起来,且三台日志里既没有
`restarted` 也没有任何错误。
## 真因:任务被非 owner「消费」掉了
pending 命令由 runCommands 的 `for {}` 循环每轮重取 PendingList(),取出后
ClaimPending 即从 map 移除。我当时在「owner != e.ID」时把任务塞回
PendingTasks —— 于是它**立刻又变回待处理**,下一轮循环再次取到,无限
`defer restart`(单测直接跑成死循环,300s 超时)。
而上一版的 `continue` 同样是错的:ClaimPending 已经把任务移除,continue
等于消费,owner 永远收不到。
## 修法:放进「选择」循环,和 Revoke 完全同构
runCommands 里 Revoke 早就有正确的定向投递范式:
owner == e.ID → 我持有,执行
owner == "" 且最低负载 → 转发已消失,兜底消费
否则 → continue(任务**留在 token 里**随环前进)
restart 照抄这套。非 owner 只是不选中它,任务随 token 传给下一个节点,直到
owner 那一跳被取走。owner 已消失也不会永远飘着(`owner == ""` 由最低负载
节点兜底消费),与 Revoke 的处理一致。
执行侧的 owner 判定保留为第二道防线(双保险,两层各有测试覆盖)。
## 测试(又抓到一次假绿 + 一次死循环)
- TestRestartTaskReachesNonLocalOwner:非 owner 处理一 token 后任务必须仍在
token 里,随后 owner 处理时恰好应用 1 次。
★ 第一次写它时反复把**同一个 State 值**喂回 OnToken,导致死循环;改成按
真实环的走法(每跳喂一个新 token)后正常。
- TestRestartOnlyAppliedByOwner:把 peer 设成**最低负载节点**(否则泛用认领
分支根本不会触发,测了等于没测),断言它也不得应用。
★ 第一版 peer 不是最低负载节点 ⇒ 删掉 selection 分支后测试仍然绿,是假绿;
改为最低负载后,删分支 → TestRestartTaskReachesNonLocalOwner 变红。
- 其余:TestRestartTaskBypassesDuplicateClaimGuard、TestRestartFlagSurvives
TokenSerialization 保持绿。
★ 第三次「双向验证」的价值:一个测试抓不到,**另一个**抓到了。单靠一个测试
的绿就下结论是不安全的。
go build / go vet / go test ./... 全绿,gofmt 干净。
446 lines
19 KiB
Go
446 lines
19 KiB
Go
package cluster
|
|
|
|
import (
|
|
"context"
|
|
"encoding/json"
|
|
"testing"
|
|
|
|
"webui4frpc/internal/store"
|
|
)
|
|
|
|
// TestRevokeTaskMarksTopologyDisabled: a stop delivered through the ring marks
|
|
// the topology entry disabled instead of deleting it, calls Handler.Revoke, and
|
|
// logs forward.stop.
|
|
//
|
|
// The entry is deliberately KEPT: TopoEntry.Link is the carrier that makes the
|
|
// stop travel, and State rides the token every cycle. Keeping it is what lets a
|
|
// stop reach a member that was offline when the stop was issued — deleting the
|
|
// entry left the flag nowhere to live, so a stop converged only if the owning
|
|
// node happened to be online for a one-shot revoke task.
|
|
func TestRevokeTaskMarksTopologyDisabled(t *testing.T) {
|
|
revoked := false
|
|
eng := NewEngine("n1", "n1:7500", "u", "p", "0.71.0", nil,
|
|
&fakeHandler{load: Load{MemPct: 5, NetPct: 5},
|
|
revoke: func(ctx context.Context, tk *Task) error { revoked = true; return nil }},
|
|
func(ctx context.Context, next string, tk *Token) error { return nil },
|
|
"n1:7500", true, "")
|
|
|
|
// establish a forward
|
|
eng.state.AddPending(store.Local{Name: "web"}, store.Remote{Name: "frps1"}, store.Link{RemotePort: 18081})
|
|
// lowest-load is n1 (only node): it claims + builds topology
|
|
if _, err := eng.OnToken(context.Background(), &Token{Cycle: 1, State: eng.state}); err != nil {
|
|
t.Fatal(err)
|
|
}
|
|
if len(eng.state.TopologyList()) != 1 {
|
|
t.Fatalf("topology after claim = %+v", eng.state.TopologyList())
|
|
}
|
|
if d, _ := eng.state.TopologyDisabled("web", "frps1", 18081); d {
|
|
t.Fatal("a freshly claimed forward must not start out disabled")
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
// publish a revoke task pointing at the same forward
|
|
eng.state.AddRevoke(store.Local{Name: "web"}, store.Remote{Name: "frps1"}, store.Link{RemotePort: 18081})
|
|
if _, err := eng.OnToken(context.Background(), &Token{Cycle: 2, State: eng.state}); err != nil {
|
|
t.Fatal(err)
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
// The entry must SURVIVE, marked disabled, so the flag keeps travelling.
|
|
if len(eng.state.TopologyList()) != 1 {
|
|
t.Fatalf("topology entry was removed; the disabled flag would have no carrier: %+v",
|
|
eng.state.TopologyList())
|
|
}
|
|
disabled, known := eng.state.TopologyDisabled("web", "frps1", 18081)
|
|
if !known {
|
|
t.Fatal("topology entry missing after revoke")
|
|
}
|
|
if !disabled {
|
|
t.Fatal("revoke did not mark the topology entry disabled")
|
|
}
|
|
// Active must follow the flag, since OfflineReassign only re-queues Active
|
|
// entries — a stopped forward must not be resurrected by a node departure.
|
|
if eng.state.TopologyList()[0].Active {
|
|
t.Fatal("a stopped forward must not remain Active (OfflineReassign would re-queue it)")
|
|
}
|
|
if !revoked {
|
|
t.Fatal("Handler.Revoke was not called")
|
|
}
|
|
// log should contain forward.stop (not forward.remove — nothing was removed)
|
|
var sawStop bool
|
|
for _, e := range eng.Log.Snapshot() {
|
|
if e.Kind == LogForwardStop {
|
|
sawStop = true
|
|
}
|
|
}
|
|
if !sawStop {
|
|
t.Fatalf("log missing forward.stop: %+v", eng.Log.Snapshot())
|
|
}
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
// TestStoppedTopologyEntrySurvivesAdoption is the property that makes the whole
|
|
// mark-don't-remove design work: because the entry persists, a node that adopts
|
|
// ring state learns the stop. This is the offline-member case a one-shot revoke
|
|
// task could never cover.
|
|
func TestStoppedTopologyEntrySurvivesAdoption(t *testing.T) {
|
|
src := newTestEngine("n1", true)
|
|
src.state.AddPending(store.Local{Name: "web"}, store.Remote{Name: "frps1"}, store.Link{RemotePort: 18081})
|
|
if _, err := src.OnToken(context.Background(), &Token{Cycle: 1, State: src.state}); err != nil {
|
|
t.Fatal(err)
|
|
}
|
|
src.state.AddRevoke(store.Local{Name: "web"}, store.Remote{Name: "frps1"}, store.Link{RemotePort: 18081})
|
|
if _, err := src.OnToken(context.Background(), &Token{Cycle: 2, State: src.state}); err != nil {
|
|
t.Fatal(err)
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
// A different node adopts the ring state (what e.state = tk.State does).
|
|
peer := newTestEngine("n2", false)
|
|
peer.AdoptState(src.state)
|
|
|
|
disabled, known := peer.TopologyDisabled("web", "frps1", 18081)
|
|
if !known {
|
|
t.Fatal("peer did not receive the topology entry for the stopped forward")
|
|
}
|
|
if !disabled {
|
|
t.Fatal("peer adopted the entry but no longer sees it as disabled — the stop did not propagate")
|
|
}
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
// TestRevokeIdempotent: revoking an already-missing forward does not error.
|
|
//
|
|
// It must ALSO still call Handler.Revoke. The handler is what actually stops
|
|
// the per-forward frpc worker; the topology entry is only bookkeeping. Gating
|
|
// the handler on RemoveTopology()'s return value (as this test used to permit)
|
|
// turned every revoke of an already-absent forward into a silent no-op — the
|
|
// worker kept running, which is how a forward the user had stopped kept
|
|
// dialling a local service that was intentionally down, forever.
|
|
func TestRevokeIdempotent(t *testing.T) {
|
|
revoked := 0
|
|
eng := NewEngine("n1", "n1:7500", "u", "p", "0.71.0", nil,
|
|
&fakeHandler{load: Load{MemPct: 5, NetPct: 5},
|
|
revoke: func(ctx context.Context, tk *Task) error { revoked++; return nil }},
|
|
func(ctx context.Context, next string, tk *Token) error { return nil },
|
|
"n1:7500", true, "")
|
|
|
|
eng.state.AddRevoke(store.Local{Name: "ghost"}, store.Remote{Name: "frps1"}, store.Link{RemotePort: 1})
|
|
if _, err := eng.OnToken(context.Background(), &Token{Cycle: 1, State: eng.state}); err != nil {
|
|
t.Fatalf("revoke missing: %v", err)
|
|
}
|
|
// no topology entry, no panic
|
|
if len(eng.state.TopologyList()) != 0 {
|
|
t.Fatal("should be empty")
|
|
}
|
|
// The stop side-effect must have happened even though there was no entry.
|
|
if revoked != 1 {
|
|
t.Fatalf("Handler.Revoke called %d times, want 1 — a revoke with no topology entry "+
|
|
"must still stop the worker, otherwise stopped forwards keep running", revoked)
|
|
}
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
// TestStoppedForwardNotRequeuedOnNodeDeparture pins why marking (rather than
|
|
// deleting) is safe: OfflineReassign only re-queues ACTIVE entries, so a
|
|
// stopped forward is not silently handed to another node when its owner goes
|
|
// away. Deleting the entry, or leaving it Active, would both resurrect it.
|
|
func TestStoppedForwardNotRequeuedOnNodeDeparture(t *testing.T) {
|
|
eng := newTestEngine("n1", true)
|
|
eng.state.AddPending(store.Local{Name: "web"}, store.Remote{Name: "frps1"}, store.Link{RemotePort: 18081})
|
|
if _, err := eng.OnToken(context.Background(), &Token{Cycle: 1, State: eng.state}); err != nil {
|
|
t.Fatal(err)
|
|
}
|
|
eng.state.AddRevoke(store.Local{Name: "web"}, store.Remote{Name: "frps1"}, store.Link{RemotePort: 18081})
|
|
if _, err := eng.OnToken(context.Background(), &Token{Cycle: 2, State: eng.state}); err != nil {
|
|
t.Fatal(err)
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
owner := eng.state.TopologyList()[0].OwnerID
|
|
eng.state.OfflineReassign(owner)
|
|
|
|
if n := len(eng.state.PendingList()); n != 0 {
|
|
t.Fatalf("a stopped forward was re-queued on the owner's departure (pending=%d): %+v",
|
|
n, eng.state.PendingList())
|
|
}
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
// TestSubmitTaskNotBlockedByStoppedEntry is the regression test for the bug the
|
|
// mark-don't-remove change introduced: SubmitTask's idempotency guard used
|
|
// HasTask, which matches a disabled topology entry. Since a stop now KEEPS the
|
|
// entry, any submission for that forward while it is still stopped is swallowed
|
|
// by its own guard — so a stopped forward can never be started again.
|
|
//
|
|
// The probe deliberately submits WITHOUT re-enabling first. Re-enabling would
|
|
// clear the flag and make HasTask and HasActiveTask agree, hiding the defect;
|
|
// the guard has to be exercised at the moment the entry is still stopped.
|
|
func TestSubmitTaskNotBlockedByStoppedEntry(t *testing.T) {
|
|
eng := newTestEngine("n1", true)
|
|
eng.state.AddPending(store.Local{Name: "web"}, store.Remote{Name: "frps1"}, store.Link{RemotePort: 18081})
|
|
if _, err := eng.OnToken(context.Background(), &Token{Cycle: 1, State: eng.state}); err != nil {
|
|
t.Fatal(err)
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
// stop it -> entry is kept, marked disabled
|
|
eng.state.AddRevoke(store.Local{Name: "web"}, store.Remote{Name: "frps1"}, store.Link{RemotePort: 18081})
|
|
if _, err := eng.OnToken(context.Background(), &Token{Cycle: 2, State: eng.state}); err != nil {
|
|
t.Fatal(err)
|
|
}
|
|
if d, _ := eng.state.TopologyDisabled("web", "frps1", 18081); !d {
|
|
t.Fatal("precondition: forward should be disabled")
|
|
}
|
|
// The stopped entry IS findable by the broad predicate — which is exactly why
|
|
// the narrow one has to exist.
|
|
if !eng.HasTask("web", "frps1", 18081) {
|
|
t.Fatal("precondition: the stopped entry should still be findable by HasTask")
|
|
}
|
|
if eng.HasActiveTask("web", "frps1", 18081) {
|
|
t.Fatal("precondition: a stopped forward must NOT count as active")
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
// The regression: a submission must be published for a stopped forward.
|
|
// With a HasTask guard this returns nil and the forward is stuck forever.
|
|
tk := eng.SubmitTask(store.Local{Name: "web"}, store.Remote{Name: "frps1"},
|
|
store.Link{RemotePort: 18081})
|
|
if tk == nil {
|
|
t.Fatal("SubmitTask was swallowed by the stopped topology entry — " +
|
|
"a stopped forward could never be started again")
|
|
}
|
|
if tk.Link.RemotePort != 18081 {
|
|
t.Fatalf("unexpected task: %+v", tk)
|
|
}
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
// TestSubmitTaskStillDedupesActiveForward is the other half of the guard: the
|
|
// narrower predicate must not turn SubmitTask into a duplicate-task generator.
|
|
func TestSubmitTaskStillDedupesActiveForward(t *testing.T) {
|
|
eng := newTestEngine("n1", true)
|
|
eng.state.AddPending(store.Local{Name: "web"}, store.Remote{Name: "frps1"}, store.Link{RemotePort: 18081})
|
|
if _, err := eng.OnToken(context.Background(), &Token{Cycle: 1, State: eng.state}); err != nil {
|
|
t.Fatal(err)
|
|
}
|
|
if !eng.HasActiveTask("web", "frps1", 18081) {
|
|
t.Fatal("precondition: a claimed forward must count as active")
|
|
}
|
|
if tk := eng.SubmitTask(store.Local{Name: "web"}, store.Remote{Name: "frps1"},
|
|
store.Link{RemotePort: 18081}); tk != nil {
|
|
t.Fatalf("SubmitTask must stay idempotent for an active forward, got %+v", tk)
|
|
}
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
// TestStoppedForwardNotRequeuedOnNodeDeparture pins why marking (rather than
|
|
// deleting) is safe: OfflineReassign only re-queues ACTIVE entries, so a
|
|
// stopped forward is not silently handed to another node when its owner goes
|
|
|
|
// TestAddTopologyRespectsDisabledFlag: a claim that carries a stopped forward
|
|
// must not mark the new entry Active, or it would come back to life.
|
|
func TestAddTopologyRespectsDisabledFlag(t *testing.T) {
|
|
s := &State{Topology: map[string]*TopoEntry{}}
|
|
e := s.AddTopology(&Task{
|
|
ID: "t1", Local: store.Local{Name: "web"}, Remote: store.Remote{Name: "frps1"},
|
|
Link: store.Link{RemotePort: 18081, Disabled: true},
|
|
}, "n1")
|
|
if e.Active {
|
|
t.Fatal("AddTopology forced Active=true for a disabled claim — the forward would resurrect")
|
|
}
|
|
if !e.Link.Disabled {
|
|
t.Fatal("AddTopology dropped the disabled flag from the link")
|
|
}
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
// TestRestartTaskBypassesDuplicateClaimGuard is the engine half of the
|
|
// re-enable path: a restart task for a forward that still HAS a topology entry
|
|
// must reach Handler.Restart.
|
|
//
|
|
// This is precisely what the duplicate-claim guard refuses — it exists to stop
|
|
// a stale task from spawning a second worker for an owned forward, and a restart
|
|
// is indistinguishable from that unless it is an explicit task kind. Marking
|
|
// the entry stopped (instead of deleting it) is what made this necessary: the
|
|
// entry the guard keys on now outlives a stop.
|
|
func TestRestartTaskBypassesDuplicateClaimGuard(t *testing.T) {
|
|
restarts := 0
|
|
claims := 0
|
|
eng := NewEngine("n1", "n1:7500", "u", "p", "0.71.0", nil,
|
|
&fakeHandler{load: Load{MemPct: 5, NetPct: 5},
|
|
claim: func(ctx context.Context, tk *Task) error { claims++; return nil },
|
|
restart: func(ctx context.Context, tk *Task) error { restarts++; return nil }},
|
|
func(ctx context.Context, next string, tk *Token) error { return nil },
|
|
"n1:7500", true, "")
|
|
|
|
// Establish + stop: entry survives, marked disabled.
|
|
eng.state.AddPending(store.Local{Name: "web"}, store.Remote{Name: "frps1"}, store.Link{RemotePort: 18081})
|
|
if _, err := eng.OnToken(context.Background(), &Token{Cycle: 1, State: eng.state}); err != nil {
|
|
t.Fatal(err)
|
|
}
|
|
eng.state.AddRevoke(store.Local{Name: "web"}, store.Remote{Name: "frps1"}, store.Link{RemotePort: 18081})
|
|
if _, err := eng.OnToken(context.Background(), &Token{Cycle: 2, State: eng.state}); err != nil {
|
|
t.Fatal(err)
|
|
}
|
|
if d, _ := eng.state.TopologyDisabled("web", "frps1", 18081); !d {
|
|
t.Fatal("precondition: should be disabled")
|
|
}
|
|
entryCount := len(eng.state.TopologyList())
|
|
|
|
// Start: publish a restart and run a cycle.
|
|
eng.state.UpdateTopologyDisabled("web", "frps1", 18081, false)
|
|
eng.SubmitRestart(store.Local{Name: "web"}, store.Remote{Name: "frps1"},
|
|
store.Link{RemotePort: 18081})
|
|
if _, err := eng.OnToken(context.Background(), &Token{Cycle: 3, State: eng.state}); err != nil {
|
|
t.Fatal(err)
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
if restarts != 1 {
|
|
t.Fatalf("Handler.Restart called %d times, want 1 — the restart task was swallowed "+
|
|
"by the duplicate-claim guard, so the forward would never come back", restarts)
|
|
}
|
|
if claims != 1 {
|
|
t.Fatalf("Handler.Claim called %d times, want 1 (the original claim only); "+
|
|
"a restart must not re-run the claim bookkeeping", claims)
|
|
}
|
|
// Re-enabling must not create a second entry.
|
|
if n := len(eng.state.TopologyList()); n != entryCount {
|
|
t.Fatalf("restart created a duplicate topology entry: %d -> %d", entryCount, n)
|
|
}
|
|
if d, _ := eng.state.TopologyDisabled("web", "frps1", 18081); d {
|
|
t.Fatal("entry is still disabled after the restart task was applied")
|
|
}
|
|
var sawStart bool
|
|
for _, e := range eng.Log.Snapshot() {
|
|
if e.Kind == LogForwardStart {
|
|
sawStart = true
|
|
}
|
|
}
|
|
if !sawStart {
|
|
t.Fatalf("log missing forward.start: %+v", eng.Log.Snapshot())
|
|
}
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
// TestRestartFlagSurvivesTokenSerialization: the restart task travels to the
|
|
// owner inside the token, so the flag must round-trip through JSON. Without the
|
|
// struct tag it would silently deserialize as false and the owner would treat
|
|
// it as an ordinary claim — which the duplicate guard then discards.
|
|
func TestRestartFlagSurvivesTokenSerialization(t *testing.T) {
|
|
eng := newTestEngine("n1", true)
|
|
eng.SubmitRestart(store.Local{Name: "web"}, store.Remote{Name: "frps1"},
|
|
store.Link{RemotePort: 18081})
|
|
|
|
blob, err := json.Marshal(&Token{Cycle: 7, State: eng.state})
|
|
if err != nil {
|
|
t.Fatal(err)
|
|
}
|
|
var back Token
|
|
if err := json.Unmarshal(blob, &back); err != nil {
|
|
t.Fatal(err)
|
|
}
|
|
var found *Task
|
|
for _, tk := range back.State.PendingList() {
|
|
if tk.Local.Name == "web" && tk.Link.RemotePort == 18081 {
|
|
found = tk
|
|
}
|
|
}
|
|
if found == nil {
|
|
t.Fatal("restart task did not survive token serialization")
|
|
}
|
|
if !found.Restart {
|
|
t.Fatal("the restart flag was lost in JSON — the owner would see a plain claim " +
|
|
"and the duplicate guard would discard it")
|
|
}
|
|
// Revoke and Restart must stay distinguishable.
|
|
if found.Revoke {
|
|
t.Fatal("a restart task must not also read as a revocation")
|
|
}
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
// TestRestartTaskReachesNonLocalOwner.
|
|
func TestRestartOnlyAppliedByOwner(t *testing.T) {
|
|
restarts := 0
|
|
h := &fakeHandler{load: Load{MemPct: 5, NetPct: 5},
|
|
restart: func(ctx context.Context, tk *Task) error { restarts++; return nil }}
|
|
|
|
// Owner node claims the forward.
|
|
owner := NewEngine("n1", "n1:7500", "u", "p", "0.71.0", nil, h,
|
|
func(ctx context.Context, next string, tk *Token) error { return nil }, "n1:7500", true, "")
|
|
owner.state.AddPending(store.Local{Name: "web"}, store.Remote{Name: "frps1"}, store.Link{RemotePort: 18081})
|
|
if _, err := owner.OnToken(context.Background(), &Token{Cycle: 1, State: owner.state, SentAt: 1}); err != nil {
|
|
t.Fatal(err)
|
|
}
|
|
if len(owner.state.TopologyList()) != 1 {
|
|
t.Fatalf("precondition: owner should hold the entry, got %+v", owner.state.TopologyList())
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
// A peer adopts the same ring state but does not own the forward.
|
|
peer := NewEngine("n2", "n2:7500", "u", "p", "0.71.0", nil, h,
|
|
func(ctx context.Context, next string, tk *Token) error { return nil }, "n2:7500", false, "")
|
|
peer.AdoptState(owner.state)
|
|
tk := peer.SubmitRestart(store.Local{Name: "web"}, store.Remote{Name: "frps1"},
|
|
store.Link{RemotePort: 18081})
|
|
if tk == nil {
|
|
t.Fatal("SubmitRestart returned nil")
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
// The peer processes one token: it must NOT apply the restart.
|
|
if _, err := peer.OnToken(context.Background(), &Token{Cycle: 2, State: peer.state, SentAt: 2}); err != nil {
|
|
t.Fatal(err)
|
|
}
|
|
if restarts != 0 {
|
|
t.Fatalf("a NON-owner applied the restart %d time(s) — it would spawn an orphaned "+
|
|
"worker for a forward owned by somebody else", restarts)
|
|
}
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
// TestRestartTaskReachesNonLocalOwner: a restart published on a node that is NOT
|
|
// the owner must survive the token round-trip and be applied by the owner.
|
|
//
|
|
// The naive "if not owner then continue" implementation CONSUMED the task
|
|
// (ClaimPending had already removed it), so the owner never received it and the
|
|
// forward stayed stopped with nothing logged as an error. Deferral must
|
|
// re-queue it.
|
|
//
|
|
// Each OnToken is fed a FRESH token (as the real ring does — the successor's
|
|
// OnToken receives the state the predecessor returned), so the deferral is
|
|
// exercised once per hop rather than re-processing one snapshot.
|
|
func TestRestartTaskReachesNonLocalOwner(t *testing.T) {
|
|
ownerApplied, submitterApplied := 0, 0
|
|
ownerEng := NewEngine("n2", "n2:7500", "u", "p", "0.71.0", nil,
|
|
&fakeHandler{load: Load{MemPct: 5, NetPct: 5},
|
|
restart: func(ctx context.Context, tk *Task) error { ownerApplied++; return nil }},
|
|
func(ctx context.Context, next string, tk *Token) error { return nil }, "n2:7500", false, "")
|
|
|
|
ownerEng.state.AddPending(store.Local{Name: "web"}, store.Remote{Name: "frps1"}, store.Link{RemotePort: 18081})
|
|
if _, err := ownerEng.OnToken(context.Background(), &Token{Cycle: 1, State: ownerEng.state}); err != nil {
|
|
t.Fatal(err)
|
|
}
|
|
if len(ownerEng.state.TopologyList()) != 1 {
|
|
t.Fatalf("precondition: n2 should own it, got %+v", ownerEng.state.TopologyList())
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
subEng := NewEngine("n1", "n1:7500", "u", "p", "0.71.0", nil,
|
|
&fakeHandler{load: Load{MemPct: 5, NetPct: 5},
|
|
restart: func(ctx context.Context, tk *Task) error { submitterApplied++; return nil }},
|
|
func(ctx context.Context, next string, tk *Token) error { return nil }, "n1:7500", true, "")
|
|
subEng.AdoptState(ownerEng.state)
|
|
|
|
subEng.SubmitRestart(store.Local{Name: "web"}, store.Remote{Name: "frps1"},
|
|
store.Link{RemotePort: 18081})
|
|
|
|
// One hop through the non-owner: it must defer, not apply and not drop.
|
|
out, err := subEng.OnToken(context.Background(), &Token{Cycle: 2, State: subEng.state, SentAt: 1})
|
|
if err != nil {
|
|
t.Fatal(err)
|
|
}
|
|
if submitterApplied != 0 {
|
|
t.Fatal("the non-owner applied a restart for a forward it does not own")
|
|
}
|
|
var carried *Task
|
|
for _, tk := range out.State.PendingList() {
|
|
if tk.Restart && tk.Local.Name == "web" {
|
|
carried = tk
|
|
}
|
|
}
|
|
if carried == nil {
|
|
t.Fatal("the non-owner CONSUMED the restart task; the owner would never receive it")
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
// The owner applies the carried task.
|
|
if _, err := ownerEng.OnToken(context.Background(), &Token{Cycle: 3, State: out.State, SentAt: 2}); err != nil {
|
|
t.Fatal(err)
|
|
}
|
|
if ownerApplied != 1 {
|
|
t.Fatalf("the owner applied the restart %d times, want 1", ownerApplied)
|
|
}
|
|
}
|