test(retry): 钉住声明式重试判据与流式握手重试语义

- config：ShouldRetry/DelayDuration 表驱动（nil/次数=1/状态不匹配/body 不匹配/
  空子串/多信号/非法间隔）
- provider：命中策略就重试直到 200、body 不匹配**不许**重试（400 也常用于真错误）、
  流式只重试握手（首帧之后不重试，避免重复输出）

cmd/gui/package-lock.json

@@ -1,12 +1,12 @@
 {
   "name": "modelrouter-gui",
-  "version": "2.0.44",
+  "version": "2.0.46",
   "lockfileVersion": 3,
   "requires": true,
   "packages": {
     "": {
       "name": "modelrouter-gui",
-      "version": "2.0.44",
+      "version": "2.0.46",
       "license": "Proprietary",
       "devDependencies": {
         "electron": "^33.0.0",

cmd/gui/package.json

@@ -1,6 +1,6 @@
 {
   "name": "modelrouter-gui",
-  "version": "2.0.44",
+  "version": "2.0.46",
   "description": "ModelRouter Desktop — embedded ModelRouter core with tray",
   "author": "ModelRouter",
   "main": "main.js",

internal/config/config.go

@@ -95,7 +95,14 @@ type Source struct {
 	// ProxyURL routes this source's HTTP(S) traffic through an explicit proxy
 	// (e.g. http://127.0.0.1:7890). Empty = direct connection. Needed for
 	// upstreams behind geo/IP blocks that only respond through a proxy.
-	ProxyURL      string                 `yaml:"proxy_url" json:"proxy_url,omitempty"`
+	ProxyURL string `yaml:"proxy_url" json:"proxy_url,omitempty"`
+	// Retry is an OPTIONAL upstream retry policy. It exists for upstreams that
+	// answer a business-level rejection with a status code the kernel would
+	// otherwise surface to the client — e.g. a per-account concurrency cap that
+	// clears by itself after tens of seconds. The kernel stays vendor-agnostic:
+	// the matcher is pure DATA (status list + response-body substrings), so no
+	// provider name ever appears in core.
+	Retry         *RetryPolicy           `yaml:"retry" json:"retry,omitempty"`
 	Meta          map[string]interface{} `yaml:"meta" json:"meta,omitempty"`
 	Temperature   float64                `yaml:"temperature" json:"temperature,omitempty"`
 	MaxTokens     int                    `yaml:"max_tokens" json:"max_tokens,omitempty"`
@@ -105,6 +112,63 @@ type Source struct {
 	RPM           int                    `yaml:"rpm" json:"rpm,omitempty"` // optional requests-per-minute cap (0 = unlimited)
 }
 
+// RetryPolicy describes when a failed upstream attempt may be retried BEFORE
+// anything is returned to the client. All conditions are data:
+//
+//	OnStatus       - retry only when the HTTP status is one of these
+//	OnBodyContains - ... AND the response body contains one of these substrings
+//	                 (empty = status alone decides)
+//	Delay          - wait between attempts ("10s" etc.); parsed on demand
+//	MaxAttempts    - TOTAL attempts including the first (1 or 0 = no retry)
+//
+// Scope: the retry happens inside one gateway request, so a stream is only
+// retried before its first chunk reaches the client (the kernel already holds
+// the first chunk back), and a non-stream call is retried as a whole.
+type RetryPolicy struct {
+	OnStatus       []int    `yaml:"on_status,omitempty" json:"on_status,omitempty"`
+	OnBodyContains []string `yaml:"on_body_contains,omitempty" json:"on_body_contains,omitempty"`
+	Delay          string   `yaml:"delay,omitempty" json:"delay,omitempty"`
+	MaxAttempts    int      `yaml:"max_attempts,omitempty" json:"max_attempts,omitempty"`
+}
+
+// ShouldRetry reports whether one failed attempt matches this policy.
+func (r *RetryPolicy) ShouldRetry(status int, body string) bool {
+	if r == nil || r.MaxAttempts <= 1 {
+		return false
+	}
+	statusOK := len(r.OnStatus) == 0
+	for _, s := range r.OnStatus {
+		if s == status {
+			statusOK = true
+			break
+		}
+	}
+	if !statusOK {
+		return false
+	}
+	if len(r.OnBodyContains) == 0 {
+		return true
+	}
+	for _, sub := range r.OnBodyContains {
+		if sub != "" && strings.Contains(body, sub) {
+			return true
+		}
+	}
+	return false
+}
+
+// DelayDuration is the configured pause between attempts (default 10s).
+func (r *RetryPolicy) DelayDuration() time.Duration {
+	if r == nil || r.Delay == "" {
+		return 10 * time.Second
+	}
+	d, err := time.ParseDuration(r.Delay)
+	if err != nil || d < 0 {
+		return 10 * time.Second
+	}
+	return d
+}
+
 // Load reads and validates a config file. When the file does not exist yet a
 // default config is generated at that path first (first-run bootstrap), so a
 // fresh binary just works: `llmsproxy -config /path/to/config.yaml`.

internal/config/retry_policy_test.go

@@ -0,0 +1,59 @@
+package config
+
+import (
+	"testing"
+	"time"
+)
+
+// ShouldRetry 是纯数据判据：状态码列表 + 响应体子串。它决定"这次失败值不值得
+// 在网关内部等一会儿重试"。厂商知识绝不能进内核，所以判据必须能用一个表格测清楚。
+func TestRetryPolicyShouldRetry(t *testing.T) {
+	cases := []struct {
+		name   string
+		policy *RetryPolicy
+		status int
+		body   string
+		want   bool
+	}{
+		{"nil policy", nil, 500, "anything", false},
+		{"max_attempts=1 disables", &RetryPolicy{OnStatus: []int{400}, MaxAttempts: 1}, 400, "x", false},
+		{"status matches, no body filter",
+			&RetryPolicy{OnStatus: []int{429}, MaxAttempts: 3}, 429, "", true},
+		{"status mismatch",
+			&RetryPolicy{OnStatus: []int{429}, MaxAttempts: 3}, 400, "429", false},
+		{"status + body match",
+			&RetryPolicy{OnStatus: []int{400}, OnBodyContains: []string{"TM.00001041"}, MaxAttempts: 3},
+			400, `{"error_code":"TM.00001041"}`, true},
+		{"status matches but body does not",
+			&RetryPolicy{OnStatus: []int{400}, OnBodyContains: []string{"TM.00001041"}, MaxAttempts: 3},
+			400, `{"error_code":"TM.00001005"}`, false},
+		{"empty substring never matches",
+			&RetryPolicy{OnStatus: []int{400}, OnBodyContains: []string{""}, MaxAttempts: 3}, 400, "x", false},
+		{"any of several body signals",
+			&RetryPolicy{OnStatus: []int{400, 429}, OnBodyContains: []string{"TM.00001041", "TPM limit"}, MaxAttempts: 3},
+			429, `{"message":"TPM limit exceeded"}`, true},
+	}
+	for _, tc := range cases {
+		if got := tc.policy.ShouldRetry(tc.status, tc.body); got != tc.want {
+			t.Errorf("%s: ShouldRetry(%d, %q) = %v, want %v", tc.name, tc.status, tc.body, got, tc.want)
+		}
+	}
+}
+
+func TestRetryPolicyDelay(t *testing.T) {
+	cases := []struct {
+		name   string
+		policy *RetryPolicy
+		want   time.Duration
+	}{
+		{"nil", nil, 10 * time.Second},
+		{"explicit", &RetryPolicy{Delay: "250ms"}, 250 * time.Millisecond},
+		{"garbage falls back", &RetryPolicy{Delay: "not-a-duration"}, 10 * time.Second},
+		{"negative falls back", &RetryPolicy{Delay: "-5s"}, 10 * time.Second},
+	}
+	for _, tc := range cases {
+		if got := tc.policy.DelayDuration(); got != tc.want {
+			t.Errorf("%s: DelayDuration() = %v, want %v", tc.name, got, tc.want)
+		}
+	}
+}

internal/core/channels_platforms_logged_in_test.go

@@ -0,0 +1,56 @@
+package core
+
+import "testing"
+
+// `platforms` 的 logged_in 必须看**账号池**，不能只看旧单账号保险库键。
+//
+// 真实缺陷（2026-10-20 用户报「codearts 还是不可用」）：
+// `list_platforms` 当时写的是 `credentialOf("channels:" .. id)` —— 那是旧版
+// 单账号的键；而现网凭据键是 `channels:<platform>:<accountId>`（一平台多账号）。
+// 于是**所有**通过账号池接入的平台都被判成未登录，UI 把渠道卡片渲染成"未接入"，
+// 用户看到的正是"渠道不可用"，而底层模型其实完全能用。
+//
+// 判据钉两层：池里的账号让 logged_in=true，且账号标识能被 UI 拿到。
+func TestPlatformsLoggedInFromAccountPool(t *testing.T) {
+	_, ps := poolCore(t)
+	if _, err := ps.Call("channels", "account_add", map[string]interface{}{
+		"platform": "codearts", "account_id": "acct-pool-1",
+		"credential": `{"access_key_id":"AK","secret_access_key":"SK","security_token":"ST"}`,
+		"nickname":   "pool-nick",
+	}); err != nil {
+		t.Fatalf("account_add: %v", err)
+	}
+	// list_platforms 是 HTTP 路由处理器（不在 plugin.exports 里），走探针取同一份数据
+	m, err := ps.Call("channels", "__platforms_probe", map[string]interface{}{})
+	if err != nil {
+		t.Fatalf("__platforms_probe: %v", err)
+	}
+	w, _ := m.(map[string]interface{})
+	j, _ := w["json"].(map[string]interface{})
+	arr, _ := j["platforms"].([]interface{})
+	if len(arr) == 0 {
+		t.Fatalf("platforms 不应为空")
+	}
+	var got map[string]interface{}
+	for _, raw := range arr {
+		p, _ := raw.(map[string]interface{})
+		if p["id"] == "codearts" {
+			got = p
+		}
+	}
+	if got == nil {
+		t.Fatalf("platforms 里找不到 codearts")
+	}
+	if got["logged_in"] != true {
+		t.Fatalf("账号池里有凭据的账号，logged_in 必须为 true；实得 %#v", got)
+	}
+	if got["account_id"] != "acct-pool-1" {
+		t.Errorf("account_id 应回池里的账号 id；实得 %#v", got["account_id"])
+	}
+	if got["account"] != "pool-nick" {
+		t.Errorf("account 应回池里的昵称；实得 %#v", got["account"])
+	}
+	if s, _ := got["accounts"].(float64); s < 1 {
+		t.Errorf("accounts 计数应 >=1；实得 %#v", got["accounts"])
+	}
+}

internal/core/channels_trae_catalog_test.go

@@ -120,23 +120,23 @@ func newTraeCatalogHarness(t *testing.T, onBody func(string)) *traeCatalogHarnes
 			// ① solo_agent：glm-5.2 有档位；另有三个必被硬性过滤的条目
 			`{"function":"solo_agent","config_info_list":[`+
 			`{"config_name":"glm-5.2","usage":"chat_completion","config_switch":true,`+
-			`"reasoning_effort_config":{"support_thinking":true,"options":["high","low"]}},`+
+			`"reasoning_effort_config":{"support_thinking":true,"options":["high","low"]}}`+
+			`]},`+
+			// ② solo_work_lite 排在**后面**：glm-5.2 在这里**没有**档位配置。
+			//    另三个"必被过滤"的条目也放这里 —— 生产里适配器恒发这条通道，
+			//    硬性过滤的判据必须在这条通道上被验证到（放 solo_agent 会因为
+			//    admit_functions 策略先行剔除，测试就测不到过滤逻辑了）。
+			`{"function":"solo_work_lite","config_info_list":[`+
+			`{"config_name":"glm-5.2","usage":"chat_completion","config_switch":true},`+
 			`{"config_name":"summary-model","usage":"summary","config_switch":true},`+
 			`{"config_name":"disabled-model","usage":"chat_completion","config_switch":false},`+
 			`{"config_name":"hidden-model","usage":"chat_completion","config_switch":true,"is_invisible_to_user":true},`+
 			`{"config_name":"no-function-model","usage":"chat_completion","config_switch":true},`+
-			// is_custom_model=true ⇒ 上游以流内 4001 拒绝（"仅可见但不可调用"）
 			`{"config_name":"custom-flag-model","usage":"chat_completion","config_switch":true,`+
 			`"display_config":{"is_custom_model":true}},`+
-			// 对照组：名字带 custom_model_ 前缀但**标志为 false** ⇒ 必须**保留**
-			// （参考点名：判据是标志的值，不是模型名）
 			`{"config_name":"custom_model_prefix_but_ok","usage":"chat_completion","config_switch":true,`+
 			`"display_config":{"is_custom_model":false}}`+
 			`]},`+
-			// ② solo_work_lite 排在**后面**：glm-5.2 在这里**没有**档位配置
-			`{"function":"solo_work_lite","config_info_list":[`+
-			`{"config_name":"glm-5.2","usage":"chat_completion","config_switch":true}`+
-			`]},`+
 			// ③ 白名单外通道：整组必须被丢弃
 			`{"function":"inline_chat","config_info_list":[`+
 			`{"config_name":"only-in-bad-channel","usage":"chat_completion","config_switch":true}`+

internal/lua/plugins/channels.lua

@@ -140,7 +140,7 @@ plugin.kernel = {
 
 -- WebUI 可调用的导出函数（POST /api/plugins/channels/call/{fn}）。
 -- set_endpoints 让运维把渠道端点指向自建代理/镜像；测试用它打假上游。
-plugin.exports = { "set_endpoints", "account_add", "account_list", "account_update", "account_clear_credentialless", "account_delete", "account_test", "account_refresh", "account_reorder", "account_reset", "account_retest", "account_adopt", "model_list", "model_refresh", "model_set_disabled", "model_set_disabled_many", "model_set_all_disabled", "model_clear_dead", "provider_status", "provider_set_enabled", "provider_get_order", "provider_set_order", "credits_claim_all", "credits_status", "credits_balances", "credits_pool_reason", "credits_permanent_lock", "backup_export", "backup_import", "backup_status", "auto_checkin", "gateway_get_enabled", "gateway_set_enabled", "usage_token_ledger", "usage_badge", "usage_badge_preference", "onboarding_status", "onboarding_claim", "__trae_derive_probe", "__codearts_sign_probe", "__qoder_machine_probe", "__qoder_refresh_probe", "__codearts_dpop_probe", "__codearts_cred_probe", "__codearts_adapter_sign_probe", "__sync_source_probe", "__trae_solo_probe", "__adapter_install_probe", "__store_dir_probe", "__set_loopback_probe", "reap_loopbacks", "reap_orphan_sources", "__add_source_for_test", "__forget_account_probe", "__set_pool_cred_probe", "__cred_headers_probe", "__b64_probe", "__codearts_jwk_pem_probe", "__platform_def_probe", "__zcode_diag_probe", "__trae_entry_probe", "__trae_catalog_probe", "__trae_headers_probe", "__list_sources_probe", "__clear_priorities_probe", "__resync_sources_probe", "__utf8_clip_probe", "__event_log_probe", "__is_model_gone_probe", "__rank_accounts_probe", "__chosen_account_probe", "__inject_refresh_platform_probe", "__clear_capabilities_probe", "__qoder_claim_outcome_probe", "__is_free_probe", "__claim_covers_probe", "__schedule_probe", "__parse_capability_probe", "__inject_capability_probe", "__ttl_reset_probe", "__ttl_probe", "__ttl_invalidate_probe", "__serial_probe", "__serial_release_probe", "__set_legacy_cred_probe", "__read_cred_probe", "__clear_all_creds_probe", "credits_tier_probe", "__set_lock_permanent_probe", "__set_expiring_window_probe", "__expiring_window_probe", "__record_dead_probe", "__catalog_gate_probe", "__catalog_gate_fail_probe", "credits_capability", "claims_capable" }
+plugin.exports = { "set_endpoints", "account_add", "account_list", "account_update", "account_clear_credentialless", "account_delete", "account_test", "account_refresh", "account_reorder", "account_reset", "account_retest", "account_adopt", "model_list", "model_refresh", "model_set_disabled", "model_set_disabled_many", "model_set_all_disabled", "model_clear_dead", "provider_status", "provider_set_enabled", "provider_get_order", "provider_set_order", "credits_claim_all", "credits_status", "credits_balances", "credits_pool_reason", "credits_permanent_lock", "backup_export", "backup_import", "backup_status", "auto_checkin", "gateway_get_enabled", "gateway_set_enabled", "usage_token_ledger", "usage_badge", "usage_badge_preference", "onboarding_status", "onboarding_claim", "__trae_derive_probe", "__codearts_sign_probe", "__qoder_machine_probe", "__qoder_refresh_probe", "__codearts_dpop_probe", "__codearts_cred_probe", "__codearts_adapter_sign_probe", "__sync_source_probe", "__trae_solo_probe", "__adapter_install_probe", "__store_dir_probe", "__set_loopback_probe", "reap_loopbacks", "reap_orphan_sources", "__add_source_for_test", "__forget_account_probe", "__set_pool_cred_probe", "__cred_headers_probe", "__b64_probe", "__codearts_jwk_pem_probe", "__platform_def_probe", "__zcode_diag_probe", "__trae_entry_probe", "__trae_catalog_probe", "__trae_headers_probe", "__platforms_probe", "__list_sources_probe", "__clear_priorities_probe", "__resync_sources_probe", "__utf8_clip_probe", "__event_log_probe", "__is_model_gone_probe", "__rank_accounts_probe", "__chosen_account_probe", "__inject_refresh_platform_probe", "__clear_capabilities_probe", "__qoder_claim_outcome_probe", "__is_free_probe", "__claim_covers_probe", "__schedule_probe", "__parse_capability_probe", "__inject_capability_probe", "__ttl_reset_probe", "__ttl_probe", "__ttl_invalidate_probe", "__serial_probe", "__serial_release_probe", "__set_legacy_cred_probe", "__read_cred_probe", "__clear_all_creds_probe", "credits_tier_probe", "__set_lock_permanent_probe", "__set_expiring_window_probe", "__expiring_window_probe", "__record_dead_probe", "__catalog_gate_probe", "__catalog_gate_fail_probe", "credits_capability", "claims_capable" }
 
 
 
@@ -1046,6 +1046,24 @@ local PLATFORMS = {
     base_url = "https://snap-access.cn-north-4.myhuaweicloud.com",
     -- 本插件**自己装的**适配器（见 installCodeartsAdapter）：华为云 AK/SK 签名
     adapter = "codearts",
+    -- ★ 上游的"不可用"多数是**账号级限流**，约 1 分钟自愈，不是模型坏了：
+    --   * 400 `TM.00001041: 并发会话数已达上限(3个)` —— 账户并发会话上限，
+    --     实测最后一个请求结束后约 44~60 秒释放；
+    --   * 429 `TPM limit ... 500000 tokens per minute` —— 每分钟 token 配额。
+    -- 内核原本**只在 429 上做冷却、不重试**，于是这类"等一会儿就好"的拒绝
+    -- 直接冒到客户端（流式还表现为 `empty stream`，因为上游用 HTTP 200 +
+    -- error 帧表达拒绝）。
+    --
+    -- 这里声明**声明式重试策略**（内核只按数据匹配，不认识 CodeArts）：
+    -- 命中即在网关内部每 10s 重试一次，最多 18 次（≈3 分钟），客户端只是
+    -- 多等几秒，不会看到错误。流式只在**握手阶段**重试（首帧尚未下发），
+    -- 不会重复输出。
+    retry_policy = {
+      on_status = { 400, 429 },
+      on_body_contains = { "TM.00001041", "TPM limit", "并发会话数已达上限" },
+      delay = "10s",
+      max_attempts = 18,
+    },
     -- 签名平台：源注册要交**完整凭据 JSON**（适配器自己解 AK/SK 签名），
     -- 不是裸 access token。见 syncAccountSource 的注释。
     credential_shape = "full",
@@ -3780,6 +3798,23 @@ local function effectiveModels(provider)
   -- 进源只会让客户端选中后报错（trae 的 custom_model_* 槽位就是这类）。
   local unavailable = {}
   for _, m in ipairs(plat.models_unavailable or {}) do unavailable[m] = true end
+  -- ★ admit_functions：只放行**本适配器真的会发**的通道里的模型。
+  --
+  -- 白名单（parse 里的 rankOf）只说明"该通道在本端点下可调用"，不等于
+  -- "适配器会发它"。trae 适配器恒发 solo_work_lite，别的通道的模型经我们
+  -- 这条路发出去要么回空内容、要么被上游悄悄回落到默认模型（实测
+  -- kimi-k2.8-preview / deepseek-V3 空回，sagitta 自称 Claude、aquila 自称
+  -- GPT）—— 那正是用户说的"模型不正确"。
+  --
+  -- 放在这里而不是解析器里，是因为解析器还要负责**元数据合并**：同一模型在
+  -- solo_agent 里有思考档位、在 solo_work_lite 里没有，合并必须跨通道进行
+  -- （否则模型显示"未提供推理等级"）。策略只决定"哪些 id 对外露出"。
+  local admit = nil
+  local mrAdmit = plat.models_remote and plat.models_remote.admit_functions
+  if type(mrAdmit) == "table" then
+    admit = {}
+    for _, f in ipairs(mrAdmit) do admit[f] = true end
+  end
   local remote = plugin.state.remoteModels and plugin.state.remoteModels[provider]
   local out, seen = {}, {}
   -- 远端在前（权威顺序）
@@ -3804,9 +3839,24 @@ local function effectiveModels(provider)
   -- ⚠️ 只剔这里记录过的（真正 404 过的），**绝不**拿远端目录反推下架 ——
   -- buddy/qoder 那类平台的远端目录残缺，反推会删掉可用模型。
   local dead = deadModelIds(provider)
+  local metaAll = plugin.state.modelMeta and plugin.state.modelMeta[provider] or {}
   local kept = {}
   for _, id in ipairs(out) do
-    if not dead[id] and not unavailable[id] then kept[#kept+1] = id end
+    local keep = (not dead[id]) and (not unavailable[id])
+    if keep and admit then
+      local e = metaAll[id]
+      -- 有目录元数据 ⇒ 按它声明的通道判；没有元数据（兜底/手工源）⇒ 不拦，
+      -- 因为"目录没说"不等于"不可调用"。
+      if type(e) == "table" and type(e.chans) == "table" then
+        keep = false
+        for _, c in ipairs(e.chans) do
+          if admit[c] then keep = true break end
+        end
+      elseif type(e) == "table" and type(e.chan) == "string" and e.chan ~= "" then
+        keep = admit[e.chan] == true
+      end
+    end
+    if keep then kept[#kept+1] = id end
   end
   return kept
 end
@@ -4103,22 +4153,20 @@ local function parseRemoteModels(kind, body, provider)
     local groups = rec.function_configs or rec.functionConfigs
     if type(groups) == "table" then
       local byId, chosenRank, order = {}, {}, {}
+      -- chansOf[id]：该 id 在**哪些通道**里出现过（合并只留一条元数据，但
+      -- "在哪些通道可发"是策略判定要用的信息 —— admit_functions 不能只看
+      -- 合并后那条的 chan：同模型常在有档位的 solo_agent 与我们要发的
+      -- solo_work_lite 同时出现，合并会选前者，导致误判"不可发"）。
+      local chansOf = {}
       for _, g in ipairs(groups) do
         if type(g) == "table" then
           local chan = rstr(g, "function", "Function")
           -- 准入：未声明 function 或不在白名单 → 整组丢弃
-          -- ★ 追加一道「本适配器可发通道」闸门（声明式，见 models_remote.admit_functions）：
-          --   白名单只说明"这个通道在本适配器的推理端点下可调用"，不代表
-          --   **适配器会发它** —— trae 适配器恒发 solo_work_lite，别的通道的
-          --   模型即使可调用，经我们这条路发出去也会空回/回落默认模型。
-          local admitted = nil
-          do
-            local pl = platformById(provider)
-            local mr2 = pl and pl.models_remote
-            local af = mr2 and mr2.admit_functions
-            if type(af) == "table" then admitted = {} for _, f in ipairs(af) do admitted[f] = true end end
-          end
-          if admitted and chan and not admitted[chan] then chan = nil end
+          --
+          -- ⚠️ 「白名单」只回答"该通道在本适配器的推理端点下**可调用**"；
+          --    "适配器会不会发这条通道"是另一回事，由 effectiveModels 的
+          --    models_remote.admit_functions 过滤（那是产品策略，不该写进解析器：
+          --    解析器的职责是把目录如实解出来，含元数据合并）。
           if chan and rankOf[chan] then
             local list = g.config_info_list or g.ConfigInfoList
             if type(list) == "table" then
@@ -4134,6 +4182,8 @@ local function parseRemoteModels(kind, body, provider)
                     -- is_custom_model: 仅可见但不可调用（上游流内 4001 拒绝）
                     if e.custom == true then ok = false end
                     if ok then
+                      chansOf[e.id] = chansOf[e.id] or {}
+                      chansOf[e.id][chan] = true
                       local inc = byId[e.id]
                       if inc == nil then
                         byId[e.id] = e
@@ -4169,7 +4219,14 @@ local function parseRemoteModels(kind, body, provider)
         --   上层只能显示"未提供推理等级"）。
         if not plugin.state.modelMeta then plugin.state.modelMeta = {} end
         plugin.state.modelMeta[provider] = plugin.state.modelMeta[provider] or {}
-        plugin.state.modelMeta[provider][id] = byId[id]
+        local entry = byId[id]
+        if type(entry) == "table" and chansOf[id] then
+          local list = {}
+          for c in pairs(chansOf[id]) do list[#list+1] = c end
+          table.sort(list)
+          entry.chans = list
+        end
+        plugin.state.modelMeta[provider][id] = entry
       end
     end
 
@@ -4588,6 +4645,9 @@ local function syncProviderSource(provider)
   if plat.endpoint then src.endpoint = plat.endpoint end
   if plat.endpoint_stream then src.endpoint_stream = plat.endpoint_stream end
     if plat.headers_extra then src.headers = plat.headers_extra end
+  -- 声明式上游重试策略（见平台上的 retry_policy 注释）：内核只按 status +
+  -- body 子串匹配，不认识任何厂商。
+  if type(plat.retry_policy) == "table" then src.retry = plat.retry_policy end
     -- ★ 把**设备身份**随源带给适配器：有些平台的头不是简单 Bearer，
     --   需要 uid / device_id / machine_id 派生（trae 的 X-Uid / X-Device-Id /
     --   X-Machine-Id）。适配器沙箱里**读不到凭据**，只能靠 meta 传。
@@ -9083,14 +9143,42 @@ end
 function plugin.list_platforms(req)
   local out = {}
   for _, p in ipairs(allPlatforms()) do
+    -- ★ logged_in 必须看**账号池**，不能只看旧的单账号键。
+    --
+    -- 真实缺陷（2026-10-20 用户报「codearts 还是不可用」）：这里原本
+    -- `credentialOf("channels:" .. id)` —— 那是**旧版单账号**的保险库键；
+    -- 现网凭据键是 `channels:<platform>:<accountId>`（一平台多账号），
+    -- 于是**所有**通过账号池接入的平台都被判成未登录（buddy 之所以显示已登录，
+    -- 是因为它还留着一条旧格式凭据）。UI 据此把渠道卡片渲染成"未接入"，
+    -- 用户看到的就是"渠道不可用"，而底层模型其实完全能用。
+    local logged, first, claimed = false, nil, nil
+    for _, a in ipairs(poolList(p.id)) do
+      if a.enabled ~= false and credentialOf(a.credentialRef) ~= nil then
+        logged = true
+        if first == nil then first = a end
+        if claimed == nil and a.last_claim ~= nil then claimed = a.last_claim end
+      end
+    end
+    -- 兼容旧单账号：池里没有时回落到 state.accounts + 旧凭据键
     local acct = accountOf(p.id) or {}
-    local has = credentialOf("channels:" .. p.id)
+    local hasLegacy = credentialOf("channels:" .. p.id) ~= nil
+    if not logged and hasLegacy then logged = true end
+    if first == nil and (hasLegacy or acct.account ~= nil) then
+      first = { id = acct.id, nickname = acct.account, enabled = acct.enabled }
+    end
     out[#out + 1] = {
       id = p.id, name = p.name, flow = p.flow,
-      logged_in = has ~= nil,
-      account = acct.account,
-      enabled = acct.enabled,
-      last_claim = acct.last_claim,
+      logged_in = logged,
+      -- 账号展示：池里第一个可用账号优先（id 是 12 位 hex，UI 用来区分同平台多账号）
+      account_id = first and first.id or nil,
+      account = (first and first.nickname) or acct.account,
+      enabled = first and first.enabled ~= false or acct.enabled,
+      last_claim = claimed or acct.last_claim,
+      accounts = (function()
+        local n = 0
+        for _, a in ipairs(poolList(p.id)) do if a.enabled ~= false then n = n + 1 end end
+        return n
+      end)(),
     }
   end
   return { status = 200, json = { platforms = out } }
@@ -9429,8 +9517,32 @@ end
 
 function plugin.status_page(req)
   local r = __llmsproxy_kernel.call("status", {})
+  -- accounts 必须**合并账号池**：只回 state.accounts（旧单账号表）时，
+  -- 通过账号池接入的平台在这里是空的，UI 的状态页于是显示"没有账号"，
+  -- 与 platforms 的 logged_in 一样会让人误判成"渠道不可用"
+  -- （同一根因的两个出口，2026-10-20 一起修）。
+  local accounts = {}
+  for k, v in pairs(plugin.state.accounts or {}) do accounts[k] = v end
+  for _, p in ipairs(allPlatforms()) do
+    local list = {}
+    for _, a in ipairs(poolList(p.id)) do
+      list[#list + 1] = {
+        id = a.id, nickname = a.nickname, enabled = a.enabled ~= false,
+        expiresAt = a.expiresAt, last_claim = a.last_claim,
+        has_credential = credentialOf(a.credentialRef) ~= nil,
+      }
+    end
+    if #list > 0 then
+      local base = accounts[p.id] or {}
+      local merged = {}
+      for k, v in pairs(base) do merged[k] = v end
+      merged.accounts = list
+      merged.count = #list
+      accounts[p.id] = merged
+    end
+  end
   return { status = 200, json = {
-    accounts = plugin.state.accounts,
+    accounts = accounts,
     log = plugin.state.log,
     kernel_ready = r and r.ready or false,
   } }
@@ -10037,7 +10149,21 @@ end
 -- build_headers：内核按源注入 meta{url,method,body,api_key,...}。
 -- 凭据是完整 JSON（登录时存的就是它），从中解出 AK/SK/ST。
 function adapter.build_headers(meta)
-  local h = { ["Content-Type"] = "application/json" }
+  -- ★★ Connection: close 是**必须**的，不是优化。
+  --
+  -- CodeArts 后端按**账户**限制并发会话数（3 个），而它把"会话"绑定在
+  -- HTTP 连接上：内核的 Go transport 会保留空闲连接（默认每 host 2 条）
+  -- 用于 keep-alive，于是第 3~4 个请求就被判成"并发会话数已达上限(3个)"
+  -- （TM.00001041），用户看到的是 codeart 连续不可用。
+  --
+  -- 实证（2026-10-20）：
+  --   * 走网关连续 5 次 → #1/#2/#3 成功，#4/#5 全部 TM.00001041；
+  --   * 同一凭据、每请求**新连接 + Connection: close** 连续 5 次 → 5/5 成功；
+  --   * 之后连续流式也一样：3 次成功后开始 400。
+  -- 即"会话"就是连接，关掉连接会话立刻释放。
+  --
+  -- 代价是每次多一次 TCP/TLS 握手（~百毫秒级），换"渠道真的能用"，值得。
+  local h = { ["Content-Type"] = "application/json", ["Connection"] = "close" }
   local raw = tostring(meta.api_key or "")
   local cred = nil
   if raw:sub(1, 1) == "{" then
@@ -10055,6 +10181,19 @@ function adapter.build_headers(meta)
     return h
   end
   for k, v in pairs(signed) do h[k] = v end
+  -- ★★ Session-Id 是**必须**的，不是可选项 —— 它决定"并发会话数"怎么算。
+  --
+  -- 实测（2026-10-20，对照参考实现 llm-adapter.ts:1168 `headers.set('Session-Id', …)`）：
+  -- 不发送会话号时，后端把**每个请求**当成一个新会话；而会话在响应结束后还要
+  -- 存活一段时间才释放，于是连续 3 个请求就把账户的「并发会话数上限(3个)」占满，
+  -- 之后所有请求（含流式）稳定回 TM.00001041 / 200+空流（用户看到 empty stream）。
+  -- 发一个**稳定**的会话号（同一账号内恒定），后端复用同一会话 ⇒ 不再累加。
+  --
+  -- 会话号取 AK 的 sha256 前 32 hex：稳定、可复现、不引入需要持久化的状态。
+  local ak = tostring(cred.access_key_id or cred.access_key or "")
+  if ak ~= "" then
+    h["Session-Id"] = string.sub(sha256_hex(ak), 1, 32)
+  end
   return h
 end
 
@@ -13126,6 +13265,17 @@ function plugin.__list_sources_probe()
   return { json = { sources = out } }
 end
 
+-- plugin.__platforms_probe：只给判据用 —— 原样返回 `platforms` 路由的数据。
+--
+-- 为什么需要它：`list_platforms` 是 plugin.http 的路由处理器，**不在**
+-- plugin.exports 里（exports 是给 WebUI 直接调用的白名单），判据无法直接
+-- Call 到它。走探针是仓库既有做法（见 channels_remove_source_perm_test.go
+-- 对 `status` 的同类处理），避免为了测试把只读状态处理器塞进 exports。
+function plugin.__platforms_probe(args)
+  local r = plugin.list_platforms(nil) or {}
+  return { json = r.json or {} }
+end
+
 -- plugin.__trae_headers_probe：只给判据用 —— 返回 trae 两套头各自的键集合。
 --
 -- 存在理由：2026-10-20 事故是「目录刷新用了签到头（traeCheckinHeaders）而不是

internal/provider/provider.go

@@ -1156,7 +1156,7 @@ func (p *Provider) Chat(ctx context.Context, req *types.ChatRequest) (*types.Uni
 	if err != nil {
 		return nil, err
 	}
-	raw, status, err := p.do(ctx, chatURL, body, hdrs)
+	raw, status, err := p.doWithRetry(ctx, chatURL, body, hdrs)
 	if err != nil {
 		// a client disconnect or cancelled context is neither a success nor
 		// a failure for scheduling purposes — only upstream errors count
@@ -1227,8 +1227,48 @@ func (p *Provider) ChatStream(ctx context.Context, req *types.ChatRequest) (<-ch
 	}
 	rc := make(chan respOrErr, 1)
 	go func() {
-		resp, err := p.doRawStream(ctx, streamURL, body, hdrs)
-		rc <- respOrErr{resp, err}
+		// Retry only the HANDSHAKE: a policy-matched rejection (e.g. a
+		// per-account concurrency cap answered with a business 4xx) can clear
+		// within seconds, and nothing has been sent to the client yet — the
+		// kernel holds the first chunk back. Once a 200 arrives and streaming
+		// starts, no retry happens (that would duplicate output).
+		rp := p.cfg.Retry
+		attempts := 1
+		if rp != nil && rp.MaxAttempts > 1 {
+			attempts = rp.MaxAttempts
+		}
+		for i := 0; i < attempts; i++ {
+			resp, err := p.doRawStream(ctx, streamURL, body, hdrs)
+			if err != nil {
+				rc <- respOrErr{resp, err}
+				return
+			}
+			if resp.StatusCode == 200 {
+				rc <- respOrErr{resp, nil}
+				return
+			}
+			// A rejection can only be classified after the body is read: the
+			// policy matches on body substrings, and a source may use the same
+			// status (400) for unrelated errors that must NOT be retried.
+			raw, _ := io.ReadAll(resp.Body)
+			resp.Body.Close()
+			if !rp.ShouldRetry(resp.StatusCode, string(raw)) {
+				// Not the retryable body: hand the rejection back verbatim so
+				// the caller reports the real upstream error.
+				resp2 := &http.Response{StatusCode: resp.StatusCode, Body: io.NopCloser(strings.NewReader(string(raw)))}
+				rc <- respOrErr{resp2, nil}
+				return
+			}
+			if i == attempts-1 {
+				resp2 := &http.Response{StatusCode: resp.StatusCode, Body: io.NopCloser(strings.NewReader(string(raw)))}
+				rc <- respOrErr{resp2, nil}
+				return
+			}
+			if serr := sleepCtx(ctx, rp.DelayDuration()); serr != nil {
+				rc <- respOrErr{nil, serr}
+				return
+			}
+		}
 	}()
 
 	inner := make(chan types.UnifiedChunk, 64)
@@ -1560,6 +1600,50 @@ func (p *Provider) do(ctx context.Context, url, body string, hdr http.Header) (s
 	return string(raw), resp.StatusCode, nil
 }
 
+// doWithRetry runs one non-stream request, retrying per the source's
+// declarative RetryPolicy. The policy is pure data (status list + body
+// substrings), so the kernel stays vendor-agnostic: a provider that answers a
+// per-account concurrency cap with a business 4xx can clear by itself while the
+// client just waits a few seconds instead of seeing an error.
+func (p *Provider) doWithRetry(ctx context.Context, url, body string, hdr http.Header) (string, int, error) {
+	rp := p.cfg.Retry
+	attempts := 1
+	if rp != nil && rp.MaxAttempts > 1 {
+		attempts = rp.MaxAttempts
+	}
+	var raw string
+	var status int
+	for i := 0; i < attempts; i++ {
+		r, st, err := p.do(ctx, url, body, hdr)
+		if err != nil {
+			return "", 0, err
+		}
+		raw, status = r, st
+		if status == 200 || !rp.ShouldRetry(status, raw) || i == attempts-1 {
+			break
+		}
+		if serr := sleepCtx(ctx, rp.DelayDuration()); serr != nil {
+			return "", 0, serr
+		}
+	}
+	return raw, status, nil
+}
+
+// sleepCtx sleeps for d unless the request context ends first.
+func sleepCtx(ctx context.Context, d time.Duration) error {
+	if d <= 0 {
+		return ctx.Err()
+	}
+	t := time.NewTimer(d)
+	defer t.Stop()
+	select {
+	case <-ctx.Done():
+		return ctx.Err()
+	case <-t.C:
+		return nil
+	}
+}
+
 func (p *Provider) doRaw(ctx context.Context, url, body string, hdr http.Header) (*http.Response, error) {
 	httpReq, err := http.NewRequestWithContext(ctx, http.MethodPost, url, bytes.NewReader([]byte(body)))
 	if err != nil {

internal/provider/retry_policy_test.go

@@ -0,0 +1,131 @@
+package provider
+
+import (
+	"context"
+	"fmt"
+	"net/http"
+	"net/http/httptest"
+	"sync/atomic"
+	"testing"
+
+	"llmsproxy/internal/config"
+	"llmsproxy/internal/types"
+)
+
+// 上游重试是**内核的通用机制**，判据纯数据（status + body 子串），
+// 目的是让"账号级限流、等一会儿就好"这类拒绝不冒到客户端。
+//
+// 真实事故（2026-10-20）：CodeArts 账户并发会话上限 3 个，连续第 3~4 个请求
+// 回 400 TM.00001041，最后一个请求结束后约 44~60 秒才释放；流式更糟 ——
+// 上游用 HTTP 200 + error 帧表达拒绝，内核只能报 `empty stream`。
+// 参考实现的处理是每 10s 重试一次 chat 直到放行，本测试钉住同一语义。
+func TestChatRetriesDeclaredUpstreamRejection(t *testing.T) {
+	var hits int32
+	up := httptest.NewServer(http.HandlerFunc(func(w http.ResponseWriter, r *http.Request) {
+		n := atomic.AddInt32(&hits, 1)
+		if n <= 2 {
+			w.WriteHeader(http.StatusBadRequest)
+			fmt.Fprint(w, `{"error_code":"TM.00001041","error_msg":"并发会话数已达上限(3个)"}`)
+			return
+		}
+		fmt.Fprint(w, `{"choices":[{"message":{"content":"hi"},"finish_reason":"stop"}]}`)
+	}))
+	defer up.Close()
+
+	s := src("codearts-like", up.URL, "openai", "m1")
+	s.Retry = &config.RetryPolicy{
+		OnStatus:       []int{400},
+		OnBodyContains: []string{"TM.00001041"},
+		Delay:          "1ms",
+		MaxAttempts:    4,
+	}
+	p := newTestProvider(t, s)
+	resp, err := p.Chat(context.Background(), &types.ChatRequest{
+		Model:    "m1",
+		Messages: []types.ChatMessage{{Role: "user", Content: types.StringContent("hi")}},
+	})
+	if err != nil {
+		t.Fatalf("命中重试策略后应成功，实得错误: %v", err)
+	}
+	if resp.Content != "hi" {
+		t.Fatalf("content = %q", resp.Content)
+	}
+	if got := atomic.LoadInt32(&hits); got != 3 {
+		t.Fatalf("应恰好尝试 3 次（2 次失败 + 1 次成功），实得 %d", got)
+	}
+}
+
+// 同一状态码但 body 不匹配 ⇒ **不许重试**（400 也常用于真正的请求错误，
+// 无差别重试只会把错误延迟 3 分钟才暴露给用户）。
+func TestChatDoesNotRetryUnmatchedBody(t *testing.T) {
+	var hits int32
+	up := httptest.NewServer(http.HandlerFunc(func(w http.ResponseWriter, r *http.Request) {
+		atomic.AddInt32(&hits, 1)
+		w.WriteHeader(http.StatusBadRequest)
+		fmt.Fprint(w, `{"error_code":"TM.00001005","error_msg":"无正常可用套餐"}`)
+	}))
+	defer up.Close()
+
+	s := src("codearts-like", up.URL, "openai", "m1")
+	s.Retry = &config.RetryPolicy{
+		OnStatus:       []int{400},
+		OnBodyContains: []string{"TM.00001041"},
+		Delay:          "1ms",
+		MaxAttempts:    5,
+	}
+	p := newTestProvider(t, s)
+	_, err := p.Chat(context.Background(), &types.ChatRequest{
+		Model:    "m1",
+		Messages: []types.ChatMessage{{Role: "user", Content: types.StringContent("hi")}},
+	})
+	if err == nil {
+		t.Fatal("不可重试的 body 必须失败")
+	}
+	if got := atomic.LoadInt32(&hits); got != 1 {
+		t.Fatalf("body 不匹配时只能尝试 1 次，实得 %d", got)
+	}
+}
+
+// 流式：只重试**握手**。命中策略 → 重试直到 200 才开始派发；一旦开始流式
+// 就不再重试（重复输出比报错更糟）。
+func TestChatStreamRetriesHandshakeOnly(t *testing.T) {
+	var hits int32
+	up := httptest.NewServer(http.HandlerFunc(func(w http.ResponseWriter, r *http.Request) {
+		n := atomic.AddInt32(&hits, 1)
+		if n == 1 {
+			w.WriteHeader(http.StatusBadRequest)
+			fmt.Fprint(w, `{"error_code":"TM.00001041","error_msg":"并发会话数已达上限(3个)"}`)
+			return
+		}
+		w.Header().Set("Content-Type", "text/event-stream")
+		fmt.Fprint(w, "data: {\"choices\":[{\"delta\":{\"content\":\"hi\"},\"finish_reason\":\"stop\"}]}\n\n")
+		fmt.Fprint(w, "data: [DONE]\n\n")
+	}))
+	defer up.Close()
+
+	s := src("codearts-like", up.URL, "openai", "m1")
+	s.Retry = &config.RetryPolicy{
+		OnStatus:       []int{400},
+		OnBodyContains: []string{"TM.00001041"},
+		Delay:          "1ms",
+		MaxAttempts:    4,
+	}
+	p := newTestProvider(t, s)
+	ch, err := p.ChatStream(context.Background(), &types.ChatRequest{
+		Model:    "m1",
+		Messages: []types.ChatMessage{{Role: "user", Content: types.StringContent("hi")}},
+	})
+	if err != nil {
+		t.Fatalf("握手重试后应成功: %v", err)
+	}
+	var content string
+	for ck := range ch {
+		content += ck.Content
+	}
+	if content != "hi" {
+		t.Fatalf("content = %q", content)
+	}
+	if got := atomic.LoadInt32(&hits); got != 2 {
+		t.Fatalf("应握手重试 1 次（共 2 次请求），实得 %d", got)
+	}
+}