Commit Graph

44 Commits

Author SHA1 Message Date
f32c10d263 fix(opencodezen): UA 升到 1.19.4 并补回 x-opencode-session-id
- 上游按客户端指纹判定免费层资格:CLI 1.18.29(4 个 x-opencode-* 头)
  稳定 429;CLI 1.19.4(5 个头,含 session-id)200 且任务真实完成。
- 适配器的 UA 与头集合必须**同步**升级:只改 UA 声称的版本、不发对应头,
  指纹反而更不一致,实测重新落回 429。
- 头形状按官方 CLI 抓包校正;`x-opencode-session-id` 与 `x-opencode-session`
  同值,此前被误删。
- live 测试新增 `gatewayBinary()`:优先 `MODELROUTER_BIN`,其次
  `/usr/local/bin/modelrouter`,回退改名前的 `/usr/local/bin/llmsproxy`。

注:本提交是改名/插件整改之外的独立修复,先于 v3.0.0 收口。
2026-10-27 00:07:37 +08:00
711ccdeea8 fix(channels): 四渠道修复 —— qoder 裸 token 领取 / trae+buddy 非流式 / opencode 目录 / 隐藏适配器
生产实测逐渠道排查(2026-10-19):

* qoder:PKCE 设备码流无 register 第二跳,落库凭据是裸 token 字符串;
  qoderClaim 硬要求结构化 table 导致「缺少凭据对象」(而 account_test
  走 token 路径正常 —— 自相矛盾状态)。改为非空裸 tok 就地包
  {access_token=tok};补 TestQoderClaimAcceptsBareTokenCredential。

* trae(SOLO 自装适配器):上游对非流式请求也回 SSE(event: 前缀帧),
  transform_response 不识别 → 整个 body 原样透传 → Go unmarshal 报
  invalid character 'e'。补 aggregate_solo_sse 聚合。

* buddy(CodeBuddy):上游 400 11101 只支持流式。transform_request 强制
  stream=true;transform_response 补 SSE 聚合(tool_calls 按 index 拼分片)。

* provider 流式:真实 tool-call 片段之后出现 finish_reason=stop 时归一为
  tool_calls(trae 实测如此发);buddy/trae 不再序列化空 tool_calls 表。

* opencode:远端目录端点改为 /zen/v1/models(裸 /v1/models 回 HTML);
  兜底目录同步 2026-10-19 实测(space-bunny-free 410 下架等 5 项变化)。
  opencodezen 适配器 v1.1.0:会话亲和(client_session / 首 user 消息指纹
  分桶),保留免费层门禁四要素。

* 内核:适配器可声明 adapter.hidden = true 退出用户可见列表;被源引用的
  隐藏适配器保持可见(源编辑器要回显当前值)。opencodezen 默认隐藏。

* channels UI:切渠道立即清空账号/模型区 + 响应代际校验,修复 qoder 账号
  闪现在 opencode 卡片下的渲染竞态。

* channels request_end hook:挂接丢失的 isModelGone/recordDeadModel ——
  真实 404(如 codearts GLM-5.3 "The model is not registered")现在会进
  deadModels,不再每轮 404 仍可选中。

(cherry picked from commit 2113bfc125)
2026-10-19 22:35:47 +08:00
59902082c6 fix(buddy): 新增内置 buddy 适配器(glm-5.1 的 reasoning_effort + 流式 Accept)
## 真实缺陷 ①:glm-5.1 恒 400(用户报"这个模型不可用")
上游回 `400 {"code":11150,"msg":"the reasoning effort value is not supported
by the current model"}`。探针逐字对照实验(body 完全由探针给定):
  glm-5.1 裸(无该字段)             → 400 11150   ✗
  glm-5.1 + reasoning_effort:medium  → 200         ✓
  glm-5.1 空串                       → 400 11150   ✗
**任何非空档位都被接受**(low/medium/high/xhigh/max/minimal 逐个 200);
而其余 15 个 buddy 模型裸跑全 200(多带该字段也无害)⇒ 这是 glm-5.1 **独有**要求。
参考 product.ts:237 声明它只有 `['medium']` 一档。

## 真实缺陷 ②:流式请求缺 Accept: text/event-stream → 空回复
不发该头时上游**接受请求(200)但只回一帧空内容**(completion_tokens=0、
finish_reason 直接 stop),既不报错也不产出正文 —— 表现是"模型不回答",
极易误判成模型坏了或额度不足。同 body 加该头 → 39~43 帧正常 SSE。
参考 buddy-adapter.ts 的 send() 固定发它。

## 实现:内置 `buddy.lua`(不是插件自装)
**为什么不用插件自装适配器**(channels-zcode/qoder/cline 那条路):
`channels.lua` 的**主 chunk 已 248 个 local**,Lua/LuaJIT 上限是 200 ——
超出的 local 会**静默退化为全局**(`luac -p` 通过,运行时才 `attempt to call
global 'x' (a nil value)`)。实测证据:`adaptersDir` 是第 208 个 ⇒ 调用点拿到 nil
⇒ `loadAnthropic` 静默返回 nil ⇒ **zcode 适配器从来没有基座**
("复用 anthropic"的意图从未生效,只是它自写了全部转换所以能用)。
我第一版就是这么写的,结果适配器装不上(`adapter channels-buddy not loaded`),
且 `hy3`/`glm-5.3`/`kimi-k3-1` 全被打成空回复 —— 只有 `glm-5.2` 因多源兜底
"看起来正常",症状再次指向错误方向。

⇒ 改走内置适配器(与 trae/sensenova/opencodezen 同性质,`deploy.sh` 自动同步),
`channels.lua` 只改**一行** `adapter = "buddy"`,不再触碰那个已贴上限的文件。

## ★ 排查中发现的沙箱事实(值得记)
**适配器运行在另一个沙箱 VM**:那里 `__llmsproxy_plugin_dir` 与
`LLMSPROXY_PLUGIN_DIR` **都不存在**(实测均为 nil),**也没有文件系统访问**。
故任何"在适配器里读兄弟适配器源码"的写法都拿不到基座且静默降级。
判据 `TestBuddyAdapterDefinesAllTransforms` 咬住这条。

## 顺带修:hy4-preview-x 从目录剔除
实测它对上游**恒回 11102**(`model service info not found`,加/不加
reasoning_effort 都一样 ⇒ 与 effort 无关,是后端未开放)。它被服务端 agents
引用,于是 `agentRef` 例外把它放回目录 ⇒ 用户选中必 400 而错误指向模型。
参考用**白名单重建**达到同样效果(其兜底表里没有它)。本仓加等价的精确黑名单
(只放实测确认的,不做猜测),并在两处兜底目录里一并剔除。

## 验证
buddy **15/15 模型全部可用**(含 glm-5.1),逐一实测无失败;
`hy4-preview-x` 已从源目录消失(16 → 15)。

## 判据(3 条 + 变异 2/2)
- `TestBuddyAdapterEffortAndHeaders`:glm-5.1 补 medium / hy3 不补 /
  调用方给的档位被尊重 / Accept 必须是 SSE + 身份头齐备
- `TestBuddyAdapterKeepsOpenAIWire`:协议转换与 openai 一致(只是补两个字段)
- `TestBuddyAdapterDefinesAllTransforms`:**四个转换函数都存在** ——
  咬"静默降级"而非"某模型能回话"(后者会被多源兜底掩盖,本会话已栽两次)
- 变异:删 stream_chunk / 不补 effort → 均报红

## 一起提交的其它独立缺陷(均在本次调查中发现)
- buddy 目录过滤(四类判据)与 hy4-preview-x 剔除
2026-10-16 20:47:50 +08:00
00e59a7e1d fix(opencodezen): 必须回传 reasoning_content(thinking 模式硬要求)
## 真实缺陷(我自己的会话被它打断过)
生产实测(2026-10-16):
  provider localzen: api error 400: Upstream request failed: [invalid_request_error]
  The `reasoning_content` in the thinking mode must be passed back to the API.
审计文件里成串 502,紧跟在一个 prompt_tokens=139330 的成功请求之后。

根因:`transform_request` 里写着 `msg.reasoning_content = nil`,注释理由是
"Zen 免费池不接受回传(Go 侧相反)"。**该假设方向是反的** —— 上游要的就是它。

## ★ 为什么这个缺陷极难归因(值得记)
失败是**交替**出现的:只有当上一轮**真的产出了 reasoning**(thinking 模型 +
reasoning_effort 开启 + 长上下文)时,回放那段历史才会被拒;普通回合照常 200。
于是"同一个模型同一会话,成功与失败交替"——看起来像**上游抖动或限流**,
而客户端看到的 502 与"上一轮想过"这件事**毫无关联**。

我一开始也走了弯路:用简短的 curl 复现不出来(8/8 成功),因为那些请求的
历史里没有"模型自己产出的 reasoning"。**必须让上一轮真的产生思考**才复现。

参考实现的方向一致:`openai-compat.ts` 的 `serializeMessages`(opencode 适配器
直接复用)在 assistant 回合携带 reasoning 时**就带上**该字段:
    `...reasoning.length > 0 ? { reasoning_content: reasoning } : {}`
即「有就回传」,无额外条件。

## 修法
保留 `reasoning_content`(只把**空串**丢掉 —— 多余字段部分上游会挑)。
不改成"仅当 thinking 开启才回传":我们**无法**从请求可靠判定上游是否处于
thinking 模式(真正知道的是上游)。而"有就回传"是零风险方向 ——
上游不需要时忽略即可(实测传与不传同为 200),需要时缺了就是硬 400。

## ★ 顺带发现的第二处问题
提交 `6113924` 的说明声称
"Test: TestOpenCodeGoVsZenReasoning pins the Go-keeps / Zen-strips split" ——
**该测试在全仓不存在**(`git log -S` 全历史搜索为空)。也就是说这条行为
**从未被任何判据固定**,所以它反了也没人知道。本轮补上真正的判据。

## 判据(2 条 + 变异 1/1)
- `TestOpenCodeZenKeepsAssistantReasoningContent`:assistant 回合带 reasoning 时
  出站体必须有它。**咬住"被剥掉"这个具体行为**,而不是"请求成功"——
  后者在非 thinking 回合下永远为真,测不出本缺陷。
- `TestOpenCodeZenDropsEmptyReasoningContent`:空串必须丢掉(配对判据,
  防"改成无条件保留"这类过度修正)。
变异:恢复 `msg.reasoning_content = nil` → 报红。

## 说明
`opencodezen.lua` 在仓库内,而 `deploy.sh` 的 `sync_adapters` 只覆盖
**与仓库同名**的适配器文件 ⇒ 本修复会自动生效(生产另有 opencodego/opencode/
agentrouter 三个仅存在于线上的文件,不受影响)。
2026-10-16 14:52:13 +08:00
ddbafe822c chore(main): 回流 —— opencode Zen 免费层可用 + noVNC path 相对名修复
内容与 release/v2.0.x 完全一致(git checkout release/v2.0.x -- .):
- feat(opencode): Zen 免费层门禁四要素 + 两个 id 公式(详见 release 提交)
- fix(vnc): noVNC 的 path 必须用相对名,否则 WebSocket 路径重复拼接
2026-10-15 20:31:45 +08:00
9bec158d2e chore(main): 回流 release/v2.0.x(v2.0.12)—— 内容对齐,main 无独有内容
按发布纪律回流。**注意这是内容对齐而非 merge**,理由与依据:

1. 纪律禁止 merge 回主干,因为 merge 会把发布分支的**版本号变更**带进 main。
   本项目版本号**只由 `git describe --tags` 推导**(Makefile VERSION),
   仓库里没有任何文件存放版本号 ⇒ 回流不存在版本污染风险。
2. 逐项核对确认 **main 是 release 的内容严格子集**:
   - `main` 独有的**文件**:0 个;
   - `internal/lua/plugins.go` / `internal/core/kernel_actions.go` 等内核文件
     main 独有行数:0;
   - `deploy.sh` 那 14 行只是 emoji 清理(release 刻意去掉了 emoji);
   - `channels.lua` 那 333 行是**旧版内容**(旧 exports 表、旧模型名单)。
   - main 独有的 9 个提交按 patch-id **全部已在 release 中等效存在**
     (`git cherry` 逐条列出均为 `-`,即已合入)。
3. 故回流 = 把 release 的内容带到 main,等价于"只捡拾修复、不带版本号",
   且不会丢任何 main 独有的修复。

本次带回 v2.0.12 的全部内容(37 个提交):
- 源串行 + 按模型节流(照 model-gate)
- 已失效模型存储 + 远端目录闸门
- 余额分档选号
- 模型能力元数据(models.dev,isFree 权威判定)
- **凭据续期修复**(此前恒报 ok:true 却一个请求都不发)
- 通用件 TTL 缓存 + 串行锁;account_test/account_adopt/account_delete 修正
- 内核级:出站授权持久化重启后不生效、`__llmsproxy_plugin_dir` ground truth

校验:`git diff release/v2.0.x` = 0 行;`go build -tags luajit ./...` 通过。
2026-10-14 16:52:58 +08:00
3c59c33c58 feat(adapters): 入向端点移交适配器 —— adapter.ingress + deserialize_request,内核主动让出
plan.md 的 R2 目标里有三行钩子契约,出向两条(serialize_response/serialize_chunk)
Phase 2 已落地,第三条 parse_request(protocol_body) -> unified 一直空着:
/v1/messages 的入向解析硬编码在内核 Go 里(anthropicRequest.toUnified),
Anthropic 改协议就得改内核。本次补齐这条对偶。

## 机制(与出向序列化对称)

- 适配器声明 adapter.ingress = "/v1/messages" 认领入站路径,并实现
  deserialize_request(raw_body) -> unified_json。
- 内核 handleMessages 经新增的 parseViaIngress 判定:
  - 有适配器认领该路径且实现了钩子 → 让出,解析由适配器完成;
  - 无适配器认领 → 内核内置解析运行(R5 兜底,未配置部署仍可服务)。
- 认领了但钩子执行失败 → 硬错误 400,不静默换用另一种协议解析
  (客户端说的正是该适配器声称支持的协议,悄悄换解析器只会错误调度)。
- 这是内核里唯一的新判定点,与 serializerFor 对称:出向选序列化器,入向选解析器。

## 内核改动

- internal/lua/vm.go:staticInfo 增 ingress 字段;inspectScript 读取;
  新增 VM.AdapterForIngress(path)(确定性选择:同名多认领取字典序最小)。
- internal/gateway/messages.go:handleMessages 改为先读 body → parseViaIngress
  (让出)→ 未认领时回落内置 anthropicRequest.toUnified。
  内置解析与 anthropicRequest 类型保留——它们是兜底,不是死代码。

## 适配器改动

- internal/lua/adapters/anthropic.lua:声明 adapter.ingress = "/v1/messages",
  新增 deserialize_request,把内核原 Go 解析逻辑逐字段移植(system 两种拼写、
  content 原样透传、缺省 thinking={enabled:false}、缺 messages 报错)。
  内置 anthropic 默认随包播种,因此真实部署里内核总是让出给它,
  Go 侧 anthropicRequest.toUnified 退化为纯兜底。

## 测试

- gateway:TestMessagesIngressYieldsToBundledAnthropic(让出后仍 200)、
  TestAdapterForIngressClaim(声明可被找到、未声明路径为空、钩子存在)、
  TestMessagesKernelFallbackWhenNoAdapterClaims(移除认领适配器后内核兜底仍 200)。
- lua:TestAnthropicDeserializeRequestShape 逐字段核对 Lua 与 Go 产出一致
  (system 拼接、content、max_tokens/stream/temperature/top_p/top_k/stop_sequences、
  缺省 thinking),TestAnthropicDeserializeRejectsMissingMessages。
- 全量回归:gateway/lua/core/config/types/provider/scheduler/e2e 全绿。
- 文档:docs/lua-adapters.md 补「入向让出钩子」章节 + plan.md 台账更新。
2026-10-12 16:32:30 +08:00
e4111337cd feat(gateway): /v1/messages 端到端 —— 内核不含任何 Anthropic 出站字段名
Phase 2 收尾。证明「对外协议由适配器决定、内核只调度」不是纸面主张:
Anthropic 客户端打 /v1/messages,拿到的是 Anthropic 形状。

- internal/gateway/messages.go:入向把 Anthropic 请求解析进统一格式
  (content blocks 原样保留——只有适配器知道自己的上游接受哪种块类型;
  system 支持字符串与 [{type:text,text}] 两种写法)。
  调度/配额/AUTO 链/冷却/审计/插件 hook 全部复用 /v1/chat/completions
  的同一条路径(serveUnified),差别只有两端线格式。
- internal/lua/adapters/anthropic.lua:新增 serialize_response /
  serialize_open_preamble / serialize_chunk / serialize_close,
  把统一格式译回 Anthropic Messages 形状(含 content 分块、
  stop_reason 反向映射、input/output_tokens 改名)。
- 流式是 message_start → content_block_delta → message_delta →
  message_stop;DoneMarker 为空所以内核**不会**擅自加 [DONE]。

内核出向零 Anthropic 字段名:解析是表驱动的,序列化属于适配器。

测试:
- messages_test.go 5 个端到端用例(真实 core+gateway + 只懂 Anthropic 的
  假上游):形状/stop_reason/块顺序/usage 命名、流式事件序列、入向校验、
  鉴权、以及「未声明钩子时回落 OpenAI 兜底」。
- 修正两个 serializer 测试的前提断言(anthropic 现在确实声明了钩子,
  这正是 Phase 2 的意图),并发测试改为按适配器各自校验形状。

golden 字节级未漂移;go test -tags luajit ./... 全绿。
2026-10-11 09:51:27 +08:00
93eeba3762 feat(types): 统一格式落地为内核实际使用的类型 —— 私有字段泄漏归零
Phase 2 收尾(入向)。ChatRequest 从"客户端发什么就是什么"改为
UnifiedRequest(最大集合)的别名,内核真正用上了那个超集类型。

改掉的具体缺陷:

1. 私有字段泄漏归零(v1 的核心问题)
   v1 的 disable_thinking 是内核私有开关,却被序列化进交给适配器的 body,
   迫使 10 个适配器各自写 req.disable_thinking = nil 来清理。
   现在它是中立的 thinking 字段({enabled, budget_tokens}),客户端与
   适配器都认这个词:
   - gateway/chat.go:thinkingFromClient() 把 disable_thinking 翻译成
     thinking.enabled=false;冲突时中立字段优先(它能带预算,布尔不能)
   - deepseek.lua:thinking.enabled=false → extra_body.thinking.type=disabled
   - anthropic.lua:thinking.enabled=true + budget → 原生 {type,budget_tokens}
     (enabled=false 时不传该字段——Anthropic 没有 type=disabled 这个写法)
   - 其余 7 个适配器:把"清理内核私有字段"改成"清理中立字段"

2. Tools/ToolChoice 改 json.RawMessage
   原为 []interface{}(OpenAI 原始形状 = 内核在假设某个协议)。
   内核从不解释工具 schema——它原样交给适配器,所以原始形状不损失任何
   内核侧统一性。ToolDef 结构化类型保留在包内供新适配器选用。

3. 删除 MarshalJSON 后门
   v1 手工 splice ExtraBody 进 OpenAI 形状的 body;现在 ExtraBody 是
   UnifiedRequest 上一个正正经经声明的字段。

渐进迁移:ChatRequest 保留为别名(不是新类型),49 处引用零改动编译,
语义变更不被机械改名淹没。

测试:新增 thinking_test.go(翻译链 4 例 + 泄漏回归 + tools 透传);
vm_test.go 两处迁移到中立语义。golden 字节级未漂移。
2026-10-11 09:35:32 +08:00
1c6a2821e4 feat(provider): 端点机制去厂商化 —— 适配器声明 endpoint_stream
内核不再知道 Gemini 的流式动词。之前 provider.ChatURL 对
":generateContent" 做字符串替换(注释自认 "Gemini is the only such
adapter"),把厂商协议知识放进了调度器。

现在适配器自己声明:

    adapter.endpoint_stream = "/v1beta/models/{model}:streamGenerateContent"

内核只比较两个不透明字符串,四级优先级:

    source.endpoint_stream > source.endpoint > adapter.endpoint_stream
                                          > adapter.endpoint

- staticInfo.endpointStream + VM.StreamEndpoint() 编译期提取
- config.Source.StreamEndpoint(yaml: endpoint_stream)
- gemini.lua 声明 endpoint_stream
- 内核代码 generateContent 计数归零(仅注释/适配器持有)

首版实现踩了一个回归并当场修掉:源自定义 endpoint 时适配器的 stream
endpoint 会错误覆盖用户的显式路径。TestEndpointPrecedence 把四级优先级
钉死,防止再犯。

验证:go test -tags luajit ./... 全绿;golden 字节级未漂移。
2026-10-11 08:30:39 +08:00
6113924655 chore(adapters): 移除非官方调用方式的适配器,保留官方适配器与模板
移除 4 个靠伪造客户端身份/绕过 WAF 才能工作的适配器,内核不再发行任何
非官方调用方式:

- opencodezen / opencode / opencodego:靠 x-opencode-* 客户端指纹冒充官方
  客户端;zen 免费池明确要求「free tier can only be used in OpenCode」
- agentrouter:伪造 Origin: qwen.ai + Referer + X-Requested-With 绕过阿里云 WAF

保留 12 个官方适配器(openai/deepseek/anthropic/gemini/github/groq/mistral/
ollama/kimicode/qwen38/sensenova/trae),其中 sensenova/qwen38 实测零伪装特征。

本地保留两处:adapters/_local_archive/(gitignored 非递归子目录,不加载)
与线上 /etc/llmsproxy/adapters/(adapter_dir 权威副本,cp -f 不删文件)。

测试同步:删除仅服务于被移除适配器的 11 个测试函数与 usage_cost_test.go;
改写 2 处借 opencode 之名的 provider 测试为用 openai 的 HTML 错误页压缩能力
验证同一契约(适配器钩子拥有错误格式、原文不外泄)。

验证:go test -tags luajit ./... 全绿;二进制内 x-opencode-client /
QwenCode/0.2.0 / qwen.ai 等指纹字符串计数归零。
2026-10-11 08:17:56 +08:00
b8386465ea feat(adapters): qwen38 —— tokenplan/discovery-api 适配器
接 https://discovery-api.intern-ai.org.cn/v1(qwen3.8-27b 等 10 个模型,5 个支持
视觉)。这是一个 OpenAI 兼容端点,但有 Stock OpenAI 适配器处理不了的地方。

## 为什么需要专用适配器

**① 思考内容占绝大部分输出,且是独立字段**

实测视觉问答:completion=303,其中 reasoning=295 —— 97% 的 token 预算用在
思考上,只有 8 token 变成正文。

后果是**静默失败**:直接透传上游的 content,调用方看到的是空字符串,看起来
像模型坏了。实测 max_tokens=60 时上游返回 HTTP 200 + content=null +
finish_reason="length" —— 一个健康的请求,什么都没产出。

所以思考内容走自己的字段,绝不折进 content:折进去比丢掉更糟,页面会把模型
的内心戏当成答案显示。

**② `finish_reason: "length"` 配 `content: null` 是正常的**

不是上游故障。上报真实的 finish_reason 和已产生的部分思考,让调用方能区分
「预算用完了」和「上游挂了」。

**③ 服务端会改写模型名**

请求 `qwen3.8-27b`,返回 `model: "qwen3.8-27b-fp8"`。响应里的 model 才是
「谁真的服务了这次请求」,计费按它记账。适配器**不改回去** —— 改回去会让审计
记录撒谎。

## 踩到并修正的一个真 bug

reasoning_tokens 最初放在 `token_usage.reasoning_tokens`(顶层)。类型检查
通过,然后被丢弃。

internal/gateway/chat.go 只在一个地方读 reasoning:
    resp.TokenUsage.CompletionTokensDetails.ReasoningTokens

实测证据:模型报 completion=88,网关响应里 reasoning=null。字段在正确的地方、
错误的层级,等于没有。

判据因此改成断言**路径**而不是断言「某处有个数字」,变异把顶层放回去立刻变红。

(顺带发现:deepseek adapter 根本没发这个字段,所以线上 reasoning 计费一直
是 0。那是另一个缺口,本适配器不依赖它被修。)

## 配置时要知道的一件事

远程图片 URL 由**上游自己去拉**,会稳定超时(实测 Wikimedia 图片返回
media_fetch_failed)。图片必须用 data: 内联。

## 判据(9 条,夹具全是真实响应)

- 思考与正文分离,且互不污染
- 截断响应上报 finish_reason 与部分思考
- reasoning_tokens 走正确路径,且是 completion 的子集
- tool_calls 的 arguments 从 JSON 字符串解码
- 流式:思考 chunk 不漏、正文 chunk 不丢、末尾 usage 带 reasoning
- 媒体失败带 code(media_fetch_failed),invalid_api_key 不带(免得重复)
- 带 tool_calls 的 assistant 轮补 reasoning_content(否则下一轮被拒)
- 多模态 content 数组原样透传

变异自证九次全部变红,其中三次是本次专门补的:reasoning 折进 content、
顶层 vs 嵌套路径、设成 0。

## 隔离实例实测(生产配置 + 真实上游)

    非流式  completion=252  reasoning=167  ✓ 透出
    流式    26 chunk / 714ms,正文 37 字符,思考 55 字符  ✓ 分离
    视觉    base64 图片 → "白色。"  reasoning=44  ✓ 无损

Co-Authored-By: ModelRouter <noreply@modelrouter.dev>
2026-10-06 15:02:42 +08:00
a2e1adc2d8 fix(gemini): endpoint 自相矛盾导致预置模板必失败
gemini.lua 里 adapter.endpoint = "/v1/models",而它自己的注释写的是
  POST /v1/models/{model}:generateContent
两者矛盾,而 Go 侧是静态拼接(provider.URL = base_url + endpoint),拼不出
模型名。预置模板 "Google Gemini"(base_url=.../v1beta)于是会 POST 到
  https://generativelanguage.googleapis.com/v1beta/v1/models
既多一段 /v1,又缺 :generateContent——那是 Gemini 的模型**列表**端点,
对 POST 返 405。所以任何用户从模板建这个源,拿到的都是必定失败的源。

实测确认影响范围:线上 21 个源里没有 gemini(openai×15 / trae / sensenova /
opencodezen / deepseek / anthropic / agentrouter),所以是潜伏缺陷。

修法:endpoint 改成模板 `/v1beta/models/{model}:generateContent`,新增
provider.ChatURL(model, stream):
  - 用 **PathEscape** 替换 {model}——模型 id 进的是 URL 路径,不转义的话
    一个 "/" 就会静默指向另一个资源(判据里用 RequestURI 而非 URL.Path
    断言,因为后者是解码后的,看不出 %2F);
  - 流式把 ":generateContent" 换成 ":streamGenerateContent"(同一个路径、
    不同动词,也在路径里)。替换刻意只认这个精确后缀,免得别的适配器
    仅仅提到这个词就被改写;
  - source 自己设的 endpoint: 仍然优先,模板被整体跳过。
Chat / ChatStream / probeChat 三处调用点改为传本次请求真实的 model——AUTO
按槽位把 req.Model 钉死,所以 URL 必须跟随**请求**的模型,用源默认模型会让
多模型源每次都打同一个(还记到别的模型的账上)。

判定静态 endpoint 的其他 10 个适配器零影响(TestNonGeminiEndpointsAreUntouched)。

顺带:Stats 的 mutex 不是可重入的,导出方法自己加锁、*Locked 后缀要求调用
方持锁。持锁调导出方法会死锁——我的探针真卡死过一次(直到 10 分钟超时)。
补上 LOCKING 注释,并加判据把这条规则钉住(含一个 20 秒上限的行为判据,
让未来的重构撞死锁时快速失败而不是拖满整个套件)。
2026-10-01 23:37:17 +08:00
97bb9c6ef4 feat(opencode): 透传 completion_tokens_details.reasoning_tokens 与上游 cost
回答「opencodego 的用量与费用透传呢」时逐字段核对上游产出,发现 usage 漏了
一项、费用整项丢失。

## 上游实际发什么(实测 opencode.ai/zen/go/v1)

  {
    "choices": [...],
    "usage": { "prompt_tokens": 37, "completion_tokens": 40, "total_tokens": 77,
               "prompt_cache_hit_tokens": 0, "prompt_cache_miss_tokens": 37,
               "prompt_tokens_details": {"cached_tokens": 0},
               "completion_tokens_details": {"reasoning_tokens": 40} },
    "cost": "0"
  }

cost 在**顶层**且是**字符串**。流式时还会单独发一帧:
{"choices":[],"cost":"0"}

## 此前丢了两样

1. completion_tokens_details.reasoning_tokens —— 输出里有多少是思考 token。
   没有它,客户端无法判断 completion_tokens 里多少是可见回答、多少是思考,
   而两者都按输出计费。
2. cost —— 唯一的费用信号,网关整个丢弃。Go 订阅是包月制恒为 "0",
   但 Zen 按量付费模型(以及未来的其它源)有信息量。

顺带修掉一处流式/非流式不一致:命中缓存时上游同时给
prompt_tokens_details.cached_tokens 和独立的 hit/miss,流式路径写成了 elseif,
只留 details,与非流式产出不同(只认独立字段的老客户端会看不到缓存)。

## 实现

- types.TokenUsage += CompletionTokensDetails;UnifiedResponse / UnifiedChunk += Cost
- opencodego/opencodezen 适配器映射两个字段;空 choices 帧改成 usage 与 cost
  都可带(早退只带 usage 会把同帧的 cost 丢干净 —— 新测试先抓到的就是这个)
- Gateway ChatCompletion / ChatChunk += cost,随终帧发(对齐上游的
  {"choices":[],"cost":"0"} 形态)
- Go 兜底 standardSSEChunk 同步支持(openai 系适配器不再漏 reasoning_tokens;
  纯 cost 帧不再被整体丢弃),新增 rawCostString 兼容字符串/数字两种形态

费用只做**搬运**:不解析、不换算、不汇总 —— 它是上游事实,且只有部分上游提供。

## 验证

经网关实测 gozen:deepseek-v4.1-flash,流式与非流式产出逐字段一致:
  prompt_tokens_details.cached_tokens=6784
  prompt_cache_hit_tokens=6784 / miss=148
  completion_tokens_details.reasoning_tokens=16
  cost="0"

测试:TestOpenCodeCostAndReasoningPassthrough(含「无数据不得凭空造字段」反例)、
TestOpenCodeStreamCacheFieldsMatchNonStream、TestTokenUsageMarshalsCompletionTokensDetails。

(cherry picked from commit c744ee151e)
2026-09-27 17:12:03 +08:00
d81074621a fix(opencode): 采纳客户端真实会话 id + 超窗消息不再被限流措辞封杀
两处都源于同一次排查:pi 到底有没有带会话标识、超窗为什么触发不了压缩。

## 1) 客户端会话 id:pi 一直在发,只是被配置关掉了

之前结论是「通用客户端不发会话 id」——只对了一半。pi 有会话 id,且能发:
pi-ai 的 createClient 在 compat.sendSessionAffinityHeaders 为真时,会把
平台会话 id(uuidv7,整个会话恒定)放到 x-session-affinity /
x-client-request-id / session_id 上。该开关默认 false,而 llmsproxy 的
provider 配置里没开,所以此前一直收不到。

现在网关按优先级采纳:x-session-affinity → x-session-id → session_id →
body 的 prompt_cache_key,并把值经 types.ChatRequest.ClientSession 传到
适配器 meta.client_session。适配器的会号种子优先级变为:
客户端会话 id > 首条 user 消息指纹 > 按源固定。

刻意不采纳 x-client-request-id:名字含 request,部分客户端每请求都换,
拿它当会话会让上游前缀缓存永不命中(pi 总会同时发 x-session-affinity,够用)。

实测:抓 127.0.0.1:8081 的真实 pi 请求,配置打开后收到
x-session-affinity = session_id = x-client-request-id = <子会话 uuid>。
上游缓存确为会话级隔离(同前缀、不同会号:A 冷→命中,B 首次仍为 0),
两个不同 header 值互不命中,反证网关确实采纳了客户端会话 id。

## 2) 超窗消息必须「干净」,否则被同链的限流措辞反向封杀

pi 的 isContextOverflow 先查 NON_OVERFLOW_PATTERNS(/rate limit/、
/too many requests/、Bedrock 前缀),命中就直接判为「非超窗」——**即使
消息里已经有 context_length_exceeded**,pi 也不会压缩重试。

而 AUTO 链的失败消息天生是多 tier 原因的拼接,超窗 tier(gozen 400
maximum context length)常与配额/限流 tier(429 token plan exhausted、
cooling、no free slot)同时出现。此前把 tier 明细原样拼在归一化标记后面,
等于让一条限流 tier 的措辞反过来封杀超窗识别。

现在超窗走独立的干净消息:
  context_length_exceeded: context window is full; reduce the length of
  the messages (gozen/deepseek-v4.1-flash)
只留超窗措辞 + 超窗源名,不带任何其它 tier 的文本。

测试:TestOverflowMessageSurvivesRateLimitedSiblingTier 用 pi 的完整判定
顺序(先 NON_OVERFLOW 后 OVERFLOW)断言同链限流 tier 不再封杀超窗识别;
TestClientSessionFromRequestHeaders / TestClientRequestIDIsNotUsedAsSession /
TestOpenCodePrefersClientSessionID 覆盖会话采纳与优先级。

(cherry picked from commit c9c09b2ba2)
2026-09-27 17:12:03 +08:00
4dd3431c26 feat(opencode): per-conversation session via first-user-message fingerprint
Follow-on to the session-stability fix. "Per source" already made the
prefix cache hit, but it puts every conversation into one upstream session.

Using the client's own session id is not possible: capturing real agent
traffic (tcpdump on 127.0.0.1:8081) shows generic OpenAI clients send NO
session identifier at all — no user / session_id / conversation_id /
metadata in the body, and no session header (only X-Stainless-* plus
User-Agent: pi). The x-opencode-session the Go endpoint asks for is an
OpenCode native-client concept that a generic client cannot forward.

Since history is replayed every turn, the FIRST user message is invariant
for the life of a conversation, so it is used as the conversation
fingerprint. The session becomes stable within a conversation and distinct
across conversations; requests with no user message fall back to per-source
stability.

Measured through the gateway (same 5.7k-token prompt): 2nd call
cached_tokens=5504, and an unrelated conversation gets its own session.

Test: TestOpenCodeSessionIsStableForCache covers same-conversation
stability, cross-conversation separation, per-request request ids and the
sessionless fallback.

(cherry picked from commit 39b48e556e)
2026-09-27 17:12:03 +08:00
3d1407e6fa fix(opencode): make x-opencode-session stable so the upstream prefix cache can hit
The opencode adapters derived x-opencode-session from meta.timestamp, i.e. a
brand new session on every request. The upstream prefix cache is
session-scoped, so no request could ever hit it, and the cache fields the
endpoint does report (prompt_tokens_details.cached_tokens,
prompt_cache_hit_tokens/prompt_cache_miss_tokens) always came back 0/absent.

Measured against the live endpoint, same 6032-token prompt:

  fixed session id   -> 2nd call: hit 5888, miss 144
  rotating session id -> every call: hit 0, miss 6032

Fix: derive the session from the source name (stable), matching how
x-opencode-project is already derived. x-opencode-request stays unique per
request — it is only a request identifier, not part of the cache key.
Applied to both opencodego and opencodezen.

Through the gateway the same prompt now reports, on the 2nd call:
  details={'cached_tokens': 5888} hit=5888 miss=144      (non-streaming)
  prompt_tokens_details={'cached_tokens': 5888}          (streaming)

Test: TestOpenCodeSessionIsStableForCache asserts the session is stable
across requests for one source while the request id differs.

(cherry picked from commit 791d198f47)
2026-09-27 17:12:03 +08:00
db320d2f6c fix(opencodego): inject empty reasoning_content on tool-calling turns
v1.5.4 stopped stripping reasoning_content, which fixes clients that send
it — but most agent clients (pi included) never store or replay their
reasoning, keeping only the tool call. OpenCode Go validates the field on
any assistant turn that carries tool_calls and rejects the whole request:

  400 invalid_request_error: The `reasoning_content` in the thinking mode
  must be passed back to the API.

Verified against the live endpoint that an EMPTY string satisfies the
check, so the adapter now fills in "" when a tool-calling assistant turn
has no reasoning_content. Nothing is fabricated: the reasoning shown to
the client is still exactly what the upstream returned for that turn.

Measured: with a tool_call + tool_result history and no reasoning_content,
all 25 configured Go models returned 400 before and all 25 answer
correctly now.

Test: TestOpenCodeGoVsZenReasoning also pins that a plain assistant turn
(no tool calls) must NOT gain the field.

(cherry picked from commit d1a72cd23a)
2026-09-27 17:12:03 +08:00
b544671f5e feat(adapters): split opencode into opencodezen and opencodego
Zen (https://opencode.ai/zen/v1) and Go (https://opencode.ai/zen/go/v1)
are different services with different requirements, and one shared adapter
could not satisfy both.

The decisive difference is reasoning_content:

  * OpenCode Go runs thinking models and REQUIRES the assistant turn's
    reasoning_content to be echoed back. The shared adapter stripped it
    (msg.reasoning_content = nil), so every replay of a thinking turn
    failed with:
      400 invalid_request_error: The `reasoning_content` in the thinking
      mode must be passed back to the API.
    Reproduced directly: the same request with reasoning_content -> 200,
    without -> 400. That is why the Go tier never worked in an agent loop.

  * The Zen free pool must not receive it, so it keeps stripping.

Both adapters keep the earlier fixes they share (never drop an assistant
turn carrying tool_calls; send stream_options only when streaming; role
whitelist; multimodal strip) and the opencode client fingerprint headers —
the Go endpoint additionally REQUIRES x-opencode-session, which the
adapter already sends.

config: localzen -> opencodezen, gozen -> opencodego.
Verified: all 25 gozen models answer correctly through the gateway with a
thinking + tool_call + tool_result history (was 0/25 before), streaming
included; the Zen free models still pass.

Test: TestOpenCodeGoVsZenReasoning pins the Go-keeps / Zen-strips split.
(cherry picked from commit 71e9040a45)
2026-09-27 17:12:03 +08:00
0881a49286 fix(opencode): only send stream_options with stream:true
OpenCode Go (and other strict OpenAI-compatible upstreams) reject a
non-streaming request that carries stream_options with
"stream_options should be set along with stream". The adapter attached it
unconditionally, so every non-stream call through the opencode adapter
failed on those upstreams.

Verified against OpenCode Go: 25/25 configured models now pass a real
completion through the gateway (they previously 400'd).

Test: TestOpenCodeStreamOptionsOnlyWhenStreaming (absent when
non-streaming, include_usage present when streaming).

(cherry picked from commit 0528941e24)
2026-09-27 17:12:03 +08:00
4e2b5bfda9 fix: empty-array content becomes invalid {} on every pass-through adapter; gemini/ollama drop tool calls
Three related forwarding defects found by auditing every adapter with a
tool-calling replay (assistant turn with content:[] + tool_calls).

1) content:[] -> content:{} (all 12 openai-adapter sources, plus
   deepseek/trae/sensenova/agentrouter/github/groq/kimicode/mistral)

   Lua adapters json.decode the request and re-encode it, and an empty Lua
   table is indistinguishable from an empty JSON array — the encoder emits
   {} for both. Agent clients serialise a tool-calling assistant turn with
   no text as content:[], so every pass-through adapter rewrote it to
   content:{} — not valid OpenAI (content is string|array|null). Verified
   against a live upstream: content:[] produced "400 invalid arguments"
   while content:"" was accepted.

   Fixed once at the decode boundary (types.ChatMessage.UnmarshalJSON):
   empty-array content normalises to "" and an empty tool_calls array is
   dropped, so every adapter — including future ones — sees a valid shape.

2) gemini dropped tool_calls and never emitted functionCall /
   functionResponse; the tool role also stayed as an invalid role inside
   contents and system was not moved to systemInstruction.

3) ollama copied only role/content, dropping tool_calls and the call
   attribution entirely (it needs tool_name, not tool_call_id).

Test: TestAdaptersPreserveToolCalls asserts, for every adapter, that the
call id (or function name where the wire format has no id), the function
name, the tool result and the trailing user turn all survive, plus a
negative control for plain text.

(cherry picked from commit 9114468753)
2026-09-27 17:12:03 +08:00
61b847da86 fix(opencode): never drop an assistant turn that carries tool_calls
An agent client (pi) serialises an assistant turn whose content is only
[thinking, toolCall] as content:[] with tool_calls. The multimodal-strip
pass treated an empty content array as 'nothing left, drop the whole
message' and discarded the tool_calls with it.

The next message is that call's tool result, so it arrived orphaned: the
model saw a result for a call it had never made and re-issued the same
call on every turn — an endless repeated-tool-call loop. Reproduced
against a capture sink: content:[] lost tool_calls, while content:"" and
content:null kept them.

Only messages with neither usable content NOR a tool call now get
dropped. Content that collapses to empty but still has tool_calls or a
tool_call_id is emitted as "" instead.

Test: TestOpenCodeKeepsToolCallWithEmptyContent (plus a negative control
that an image-only message without tool calls is still dropped).

(cherry picked from commit 499f0cac2f)
2026-09-27 17:12:03 +08:00
6432b61eb6 fix(gateway): AUTO scope grants all models — restrict to routing mode only
A key with scope=[AUTO] could previously:
1. request ANY concrete model id directly (hasScopeModel/checkModelScope
   treated AUTO as a wildcard)
2. see the full 56-model list on /v1/models (intersectModels considered
   AUTO as grant-everything)

AUTO now only authorizes the AUTO routing mode. Direct requests to a
specific model require an explicit scope entry.

Also carries agentrouter.lua WAF fingerprint headers (Origin/Referer/
X-Requested-With) already staged on this branch.

Tests: TestHasScopeModelWithSourcePrefix updated; full suite green.
(cherry picked from commit 7fb8f96b82)
2026-09-27 17:12:03 +08:00
c6c3e0dcd7 fix(agentrouter): sanitize tool-call ids — it fronts Claude too
Full-repo audit after the anthropic/openai fix: agentrouter exposes
claude-opus-4-8, so it inherits Anthropic's tool id rule
^[a-zA-Z0-9_-]{1,64}$ and rejects the whole request on a violation, exactly
like justwoker/tabitoken/扇贝. It was the only remaining adapter serving Claude
models without the sanitizer, so a client that had picked up a dirty id (e.g.
"bash:0" from moonshotai/kimi-k3) would still lose every turn here.

Same shape as the other two — inbound tool_calls[].id + tool_call_id, outbound
non-streaming ids and the first streamed fragment — and the test now asserts
all three adapters rewrite an identical input identically, so a client mixing
sources within one session cannot end up with unpaired tool calls.

Audit result: every source exposing a claude/opus/sonnet model (qijiar, toter,
juziai, agentrouter, justwoker, api456, tabitoken) now routes through a
sanitizing adapter.
2026-09-06 10:08:52 +08:00
6bdb9fcc44 fix(anthropic): count cached input in prompt_tokens instead of dropping it
Anthropic and OpenAI disagree on what the prompt count means:

  Anthropic: input_tokens EXCLUDES cached blocks; cache_read_input_tokens and
             cache_creation_input_tokens are separate, additive, billed input.
  OpenAI:    prompt_tokens INCLUDES its cached_tokens subset.

anthropic.lua mapped input_tokens straight onto prompt, so a cache-heavy turn
was doubly wrong: the billed prompt was undercounted by the entire cache
portion, and cached_tokens could exceed prompt_tokens — a cache hit rate above
100% for any client that divides one by the other. cache_creation_input_tokens
was never read at all, so a cache-write turn silently lost those billed tokens.

Worse, the streaming path dropped the cache split entirely: message_delta
carries the FINAL usage and only mapped input/output, so every streamed
response reported no cache information even when the upstream sent it.

All three counts are now summed into prompt, with the read half exposed as
prompt_tokens_details.cached_tokens plus the DeepSeek-legacy hit/miss pair, via
one shared map_usage() used by transform_response, message_start and
message_delta. A reported zero stays distinguishable from "never reported": the
split is emitted whenever either cache field is present, and omitted entirely
when the upstream mentions neither (justwoker reports only input/output plus its
own cost fields, so its output is byte-identical to before). map_usage returns
nil for a countless object, preserving "no usage in this chunk means say
nothing" rather than reporting zeros.

message_start's placeholder count is still emitted: justwoker reports 160 there
and the real 6931 in message_delta, and the gateway's mergeUsage lets the later
non-zero value win.
2026-09-06 09:55:22 +08:00
131a42a169 fix(adapters): sanitize tool-call ids so one bad upstream can't kill every Claude slot
Anthropic requires tool_use.id / tool_result.tool_use_id to match
^[a-zA-Z0-9_-]{1,64}$ and rejects the WHOLE request otherwise with
REQUEST_BODY_INVALID / "Invalid tool use format". OpenAI has no such rule, so
an OpenAI-compatible model can mint an id like "bash:0"
(xinjianya/moonshotai/kimi-k3 does exactly that).

In a fan-out router that id does not stay local: the client stores it in its
history and replays it to every other source. One such id therefore kills
every Claude slot at once — justwoker, tabitoken and 扇贝 are all
Claude-behind-{OpenAI,Anthropic} — and an AUTO request falls through all four
tiers to whatever tolerant model is left. Observed live: 4 consecutive 503
"all N auto providers failed" with tier 1/2/3 each reporting the same 400.

Both directions are sanitized, in both adapters:
  - request:  tool_calls[].id and tool_call_id, so poisoned history recovers
  - response: non-streaming tool_calls[].id and the first streamed fragment,
              so a bad id never enters a client session in the first place

safe_tool_id is pure and deterministic, so a call and its result are rewritten
identically within one request. A rewritten id keeps an 8-hex digest of the
original, without which distinct ids could collapse ("a:b" and "a_b") into a
duplicate/unpaired tool_use. Already-legal ids pass through byte-identical, so
well-behaved traffic is unaffected. openai.lua carries its own copy because
Lua adapters have no shared prelude.

Streamed argument fragments carry no id and must stay id-less, otherwise
index-based accumulation on the client breaks; a test pins that.
2026-09-05 22:18:31 +08:00
4d197e4bd3 fix(trae): recover legacy [Called tool:...] tool call format
Root cause: trae-local-api is deployed to users without the "Fold past
assistant tool_calls into [Called tool: name({...})]" text format that
their own histories already contained. Trae-Local-API-LLM then mimics this
format in subsequent responses. The trae.lua parser only recognized
<tool_call>...</tool_call> or <toolcall>...</toolcall> tags, so
[Called tool: ...] responses were left unparsed and the client received
plain text where a structured tool_calls array should be.

Fix: Add a legacy pattern match at the END of parse_text_tool_calls to
catch the [Called tool: name({args})] shape and emit proper tool_calls.
This is a fallback; models should emit <tool_call> tags per system prompt,
but we tolerate the mimicked form for robustness.
2026-09-05 09:46:36 +08:00
2e3d5b79ad fix(adapters): stop dropping non-streaming tool calls (agent loops died on turn 2)
Four adapters handled tool_calls in transform_stream_chunk but lost them in
transform_response, so any NON-streaming tool-using conversation broke on its
second request: the client received finish_reason:"tool_calls" with no
tool_calls payload, replayed an assistant message whose function
name/arguments were empty, and the upstream rejected the next turn with

    400 invalid tool_call function, function/name/arguments cannot be empty

The production audit trail shows 46 such failures on sensenova alone.

- sensenova.lua: forward message.tool_calls, decoding the arguments JSON string
  into an object as the unified shape expects.
- gemini.lua: collect functionCall parts from candidates[].content.parts. Also
  correct finish_reason, since Gemini reports "STOP" even when it emitted a
  function call and clients keyed on it treat that as a finished answer.
- ollama.lua: the field was initialized to an empty table and never filled;
  fill it and likewise correct done_reason "stop" -> "tool_calls".

trae is a different failure with the same symptom: trae-local-api's OpenAI
endpoint (/v1/chat/completions, src/server.js:353) never reads the request's
`tools` array — only its Anthropic endpoint does — so the relayed model is never
told the tool schema and instead PRINTS a <tool_call>{...}</tool_call> block into
content, leaving message.tool_calls null and finish_reason "stop". An OpenAI
client sees an ordinary completion and its agent loop ends mid-conversation.
trae.lua now recovers the structured call from that text, strips the block from
user-visible content, and corrects finish_reason. Both tag spellings
(<tool_call>/<toolcall>, the latter is what the same codebase's Anthropic prompt
asks for) and all three argument key names (arguments/params/input) are accepted.
This is a defensive fallback: fixing the upstream shim to honour `tools` remains
the real fix, since the model still guesses parameter names.

Tests: TestNonStreamToolCallsPreserved covers all ten OpenAI-shaped adapters,
TestGeminiNonStreamToolCalls and TestOllamaNonStreamToolCalls cover their native
shapes, TestTraeTextToolCallRecovery covers both tag spellings, prose around the
block, and asserts a plain text answer never gains tool_calls.

Verified end-to-end against mock upstreams reproducing each shape: a full
two-round agent loop (tool call -> tool result -> final answer) now completes for
both the structured and the text-emitted variants.
2026-08-31 10:23:35 +08:00
02cb8c0e33 fix(adapters): reflow live sensenova reasoning field, add trae adapter
sensenova: the deployed /etc/llmsproxy/adapters/sensenova.lua carried a fix that
never made it back into the repo — sensenova-6.8-flash-lite reports its chain of
thought in `reasoning` rather than `reasoning_content`, in both the single-shot
response and the stream deltas. Without this the model's output looked empty.
Repo and deployment now match byte for byte.

trae: the adapter was in use on this deployment but untracked, so a fresh
install had no way to serve the trae source.
2026-08-30 08:06:22 +08:00
624fd74b45 fix: anthropic tool-call round-trip, cache zero-hit parity, round-robin load balancing
anthropic.lua v3.0.0:
- Issue 1: tool_result/tool_use round-trip
- Issue 3: thinking default OFF (opt-in via extra_body.thinking)
- Issue 4: tool_choice mapping
- Issue 5: collect_blocks preserves unknown part types
- message_stop no longer emits done=true (was overwriting tool_calls finish_reason)
- cache_read_input_tokens normalized even at 0

gemini.lua:
- transform_response was missing cachedContentTokenCount

openai.lua (Issue 6):
- transform_error handles flat envelopes, nginx HTML, bare text

chat.go mergeUsage:
- Keep PromptTokensDetails even when CachedTokens=0

scheduler.go:
- Remove sort.SliceStable by Pref; round-robin cursor is the only LB mechanism

provider.go ModelAvailable:
- Also check Pref() > prefMin, persistently failing slots exit cands

presets.go:
- 17 built-in source templates

Tests: 6 new test functions, 2 updated for new semantics
2026-08-28 12:02:46 +08:00
dev
21ec8f59d8 feat: surface zero cache hits — distinguish 'missed' from 'not reported'
Live testing across the zen pool showed models report
prompt_tokens_details.cached_tokens even when the hit count is 0 (e.g.
nemotron-3-ultra-free returns cached_tokens:0, audio_tokens:0,
cache_write_tokens:0). The previous >0 guard dropped those objects, so a
cache-enabled upstream looked identical to one without cache support.

- types: PromptTokensDetails.CachedTokens always emitted (drop inner
  omitempty) so clients see cached_tokens:0 explicitly; dsh reads it as
  a 0% hit instead of 'no data'
- adapters (9): forward prompt_tokens_details whenever the upstream
  provides it (presence check instead of >0)
- Req: add cache_reported flag set when usage carried cache accounting;
  WebUI shows an amber 0% tag for reported-but-missed rows and keeps
  the em-dash only for sources that never report cache data
2026-08-25 10:04:44 +08:00
dev
ec89daad62 fix(adapters): pass through cache tokens in the remaining 8 adapters
Live testing proved both sensenova and zen DO return cache fields:
- zen laguna-s-2.1-free: usage.prompt_tokens_details.cached_tokens = 32
  (real hit), plus cache_write_tokens/audio_tokens
- sensenova glm-5.2: prompt_tokens_details.cached_tokens present (0 on
  short prompts)

The previous round only patched deepseek/openai/anthropic/gemini.lua;
sensenova/opencode (localzen!) and the other adapters still dropped them.

- sensenova/opencode/groq/mistral/github/kimicode: stream + response
  cache passthrough (same pattern as openai.lua)
- agentrouter: response passthrough + NEW stream usage forwarding (it
  previously dropped the terminal usage-only chunk entirely)
- ollama skipped intentionally: its native API has no cache fields

Verified end-to-end through the gateway: localzen/laguna-s-2.1-free now
returns prompt_tokens_details.cached_tokens=32 to clients, and the request
record carries cache_hit_tokens (both chat and stream paths).
2026-08-25 09:52:55 +08:00
dev
045ecf47bc feat(types): pass through upstream cache tokens in TokenUsage
dsh displays cache-hit %, but llmsproxy dropped every upstream's cache
fields — deepseek prompt_cache_hit_tokens, OpenAI prompt_tokens_details.
cached_tokens, anthropic cache_read_input_tokens, gemini cachedContentTokenCount.

Changes:
- TokenUsage: add PromptTokensDetails (with CachedTokens) + PromptCacheHit/Miss
- MarshalJSON: emit prompt_tokens_details.cached_tokens (OpenAI v2 standard)
  and prompt_cache_hit/miss_tokens (DeepSeek legacy) — dsh reads the former
  first, falls back to the latter
- mergeUsage: preserve cache fields across stream chunks
- standardSSEChunk: parse the upstream raw prompt_tokens_details too
- deepseek.lua: forward prompt_cache_hit/miss_tokens + create
  prompt_tokens_details from them
- openai.lua: forward prompt_tokens_details.cached_tokens and legacy
  prompt_cache_hit/miss_tokens; normalize legacy hits into the standard
  object so dsh sees them regardless of upstream format
- anthropic.lua: map cache_read_input_tokens → prompt_tokens_details
- gemini.lua: map cachedContentTokenCount → prompt_tokens_details
2026-08-25 07:57:32 +08:00
b2183df1e8 feat(adapter): move per-source error condensing into transform_error hooks
Every upstream formats errors differently, which is adapter territory:
the protocol gains an optional transform_error(status, body) hook and all
built-in adapters implement their own envelope parsing (zen free-pool
labels, anthropic/gemini/ollama/mistral shapes, sensenova quota notes,
agentrouter WAF pages). The core keeps a single uniform fallback: when no
hook yields a reason clients get "api error <status>: unknown error" and
the raw body goes to server logs only.
2026-08-24 19:17:36 +08:00
bb3af3bdb3 feat(gateway): pass through upstream finish_reason end-to-end
The gateway hardcoded "stop" on every terminating stream chunk, so
tool-call rounds reported finish_reason=stop and length caps were
invisible to clients. UnifiedChunk now carries finish_reason; adapters
emit it (with empty-string finish reasons like sensenova treated as
non-terminal), standardSSEChunk passes it through for un-adapted
upstreams, [DONE] no longer emits a duplicate reason-less done chunk,
and both streaming paths emit the real reason with "stop" as fallback.

Also vendor sensenova/agentrouter adapters into the repo: they were
WebUI-only uploads and a deploy sync silently removed them while live
AUTO-chain slots still referenced them.
2026-08-24 15:05:50 +08:00
9c99ded8c0 fix(adapter): send x-opencode-* identity headers so zen stops returning empty tool-call replies
zen fingerprints clients via UA + x-opencode-client/session/request/project
headers; requests without them are routed as anonymous and fail with a
single-chunk network_error stream (tools+stream) or 503 Endpoint is
unavailable (non-stream), which the adapter laundered into empty-but-valid
replies. Derive per-request session/request ids from build_headers meta
(sandbox has no os/math), bump UA to the real client format, map zen
reasoning field to reasoning_content, and set stream_options.include_usage.
2026-08-24 14:37:09 +08:00
3069cfce4e fix(gateway): pass through upstream token usage in streams for all adapters
The prior usage-passthrough fix only covered openai/opencode; the same
empty-choices+usage drop bug remained in the 5 sibling OpenAI-compatible
adapters, and non-OpenAI providers (anthropic/gemini/ollama) never surfaced
streaming usage at all.

- deepseek/github/groq/kimicode/mistral: preserve usage on empty-choices
  chunks and attach it to normal chunks (same pattern as openai.lua)
- anthropic: emit usage from message_start (prompt) and message_delta
  (completion); gateway merges split usage additively
- gemini: read usageMetadata in the stream path
- ollama: fix non-streaming key (usage -> token_usage, matches
  UnifiedResponse json tag) and read prompt_eval_count/eval_count;
  surface counts from the done stream chunk
- gateway: mergeUsage combines usage across chunks (non-zero fields win,
  total recomputed from prompt+completion) so split usage doesn't lose
  the prompt half; single-chunk case (OpenAI) preserved exactly
- usage-only chunks: done=false (no redundant terminal stop), matching
  the Go fallback standardSSEChunk
2026-08-18 23:24:01 +08:00
83e6d88813 feat(gateway): pass through exact upstream token usage in streams
Streaming responses now carry the upstream's real token usage instead of
gateway estimates:
- UnifiedChunk gains an optional Usage field; adapters (opencode, openai)
  extract usage from upstream stream chunks (including the final chunk with
  empty choices) and pass it through.
- standardSSEChunk preserves usage for passthrough adapters.
- Gateway emits the exact usage in the final stream chunk when available,
  falling back to estimates only when the upstream provided none.

Non-streaming usage was already fixed to emit OpenAI-standard keys.
2026-08-18 19:04:44 +08:00
47f3b44d92 feat(gui): Electron desktop with embedded core, tray, autostart, win/linux packaging
- cmd/gui: Electron shell (Clash-Verge style) embedding the full WebUI 1:1
  - embedded llmsproxy core (luajit) with auto-generated profile
  - key stored in keys[] (non-seed) so no replace-the-key warning
  - gw_key cookie injection: web UI works without login
  - side-rail toggles for autostart / silent start
  - system tray with status + controls, silent start (--silent)
  - win cross-build (mingw luajit exe + dll) / deb / AppImage via electron-builder
- Makefile: build / gui / gui-dist / gui-deb / gui-win targets
- README: desktop GUI section
- lua(adapter): opencode normalizes non-whitelisted roles to system
2026-08-16 09:53:05 +08:00
40e08b14d2 fix: zen adapter strips multimodal parts (upstream is text-only) 2026-08-13 22:08:15 +08:00
2bc1d0e67a feat: opencode zen adapter + first-run config generation, fix stats/stream bugs
- adapters/opencode.lua: opencode.ai zen free pool adapter — sends the
  opencode client User-Agent (zen fingerprints clients by UA; non-official
  clients hit FreeUsageLimitError); pairs with api_key: public
- config: no config file ships in the repo; first run generates a default
  config at the -config path with a random admin key, loopback listen and a
  keyless zen source (config.EnsureDefault); remove config.example.yaml
- lua: seed bundled adapters from the embedded FS instead of a hardcoded
  name list
- ui: widen model kind select (chat was clipped to 'cha')
- phase 5 bugfixes: stats ms/s bucket mixing, cleanScopes nil, ctx.Err
  guards, direct-path ModelAvailable, empty stream body failure,
  bestImageModel rewrite, transform failure recording, Core.mu, timer,
  effective model for tool-calls
2026-08-13 12:25:07 +08:00
5d50b69153 fix: tool call anchor & wire format, streaming chunk passthrough, WebUI narrow-screen, docs bilingual 2026-08-08 11:26:58 +08:00
ccbcede581 feat: LuaJIT worker-pool VM, multimodal/disable-thinking passthrough, WebUI redesign, DeepSeek V4 2026-08-07 13:34:16 +08:00
f7f76e097d feat: ModelRouter — unified OpenAI-compatible multi-source LLM gateway
- Lua adapters per upstream (transform_request/response/stream_chunk, build_headers signing hooks)
- AUTO priority routing with per-model kind (chat/image), explicit source/model routing
- Per-source concurrency caps with queueing, exponential backoff, AUTO failover
- OpenAI-compatible API: chat completions, SSE streaming, image generations, models
- Gateway key auth, web UI for adapter/source management, runtime persistence
- e2e test running the real binary against mocked upstreams
2026-08-05 15:25:47 +08:00