chore(gui): 版本号 2.0.47（与内核同版本）

生产现网发现（issue #1 排查）：billing.rules 里一条指向
https://opencode.ai/inference/v1 的规则，在该源 base_url 变成
.../inference/openai/v1 之后匹配不到任何源；严格编译因此让**整个** profile
不生效 —— 账单恒 0、unpriced_reqs 涨到 3.7 万，唯一痕迹是一行启动日志。

- 严格编译失败时降级为 lenient：应用能匹配的规则，其余按 profile default；
- 日志用 ERROR 点名**具体哪条 URL** 写错（新增 billing.UnmatchedRuleURLs），
  并说明未匹配流量的记账去向；
- 判据 TestBillingStaleRuleURLStillAppliesOtherRules：一条过期规则 + 一条有效
  规则 ⇒ 有效规则必须仍然生效。

cmd/gui/package-lock.json

@@ -1,12 +1,12 @@
 {
   "name": "modelrouter-gui",
-  "version": "2.0.44",
+  "version": "2.0.47",
   "lockfileVersion": 3,
   "requires": true,
   "packages": {
     "": {
       "name": "modelrouter-gui",
-      "version": "2.0.44",
+      "version": "2.0.47",
       "license": "Proprietary",
       "devDependencies": {
         "electron": "^33.0.0",

cmd/gui/package.json

@@ -1,6 +1,6 @@
 {
   "name": "modelrouter-gui",
-  "version": "2.0.44",
+  "version": "2.0.47",
   "description": "ModelRouter Desktop — embedded ModelRouter core with tray",
   "author": "ModelRouter",
   "main": "main.js",

docs/plugins.md

@@ -505,13 +505,22 @@ end
 
 ### 7.1 计费维度
 
-| 维度 | 用途 | 优先级 |
+| 维度 | 用途 | token 价覆盖顺序 |
 |---|---|---|
-| `sources` | 源的固定价（如按请求计费的转发服务） | 中 |
-| `models` | 模型的 per-token 价 | 高 |
+| `default` | 兜底价（通常全 0） | 最低 |
+| `models` | 模型的 per-token 价 | 中 |
+| `sources` | 源级价：固定价，或覆盖该源全部模型的 token 价 | 高 |
 | `keys` | 单个网关 key 的覆盖价 | **最高** |
 
-**token 价**优先级：`keys` > `models` > `default`。
+**token 价**优先级：`keys` > `sources` > `models` > `default`。
+（实现顺序就是"后写覆盖前写"：`default` → `models` → `sources` → `keys`；
+所以**源级 token 价会覆盖模型价**。这是有意的：运营要能给某个源整体改价。）
+
+⚠️ 正因为 `sources` 会覆盖 `models`，**"标记某源已定价"的条目只能用
+`{ "per_request": 0 }`**，不能写 `{ "prompt": 0, "completion": 0 }` ——
+后者会把该源所有模型的 token 价清成 0。编译器为 `mode: token` 的具体 URL
+规则生成的就是前者（GitCode issue #1）。
+
 **`per_request` 固定价是叠加的**（不覆盖），所以一个生图模型可以既算 token 又收固定费。
 **`cache_discount`** 见 §7.7。
 
@@ -599,6 +608,16 @@ curl -H "Authorization: Bearer $ADMIN_KEY" \
 
 仪表盘上有 "Unpriced" 卡片。**这个数应该是 0**；不是 0 就去补价目。
 
+**profile 级兜底**：`profiles[].default` 可设为 `free` 或 `unpriced`（默认）：
+
+| `default` | 未匹配任何规则的源 | `unpriced_reqs` |
+|---|---|---|
+| `unpriced`（省略时） | 记 0 价，计入未定价债务 | +1 |
+| `free` | 记 0 价，但视为**刻意免费** | 不增加 |
+
+另有 `prices.unmatched_sources`：列出没有规则命中的源，网关在应用 profile 时
+会以 `[billing] WARNING` 打到日志里 —— 看到它就去补规则（或确认 `default` 选对了）。
+
 注意"未定价"不等于"免费"：这些请求的 `requests` / token 数**照常计入**
 `total` 与各维度，只有金额是 0。
 

internal/billing/compile.go

@@ -106,6 +106,27 @@ func CompileOpts(profile *config.BillingProfile, sources []config.Source, lenien
 	return prices, nil
 }
 
+// UnmatchedRuleURLs lists the non-wildcard rule URLs that match no configured
+// source. Compile() treats such a URL as a hard error (a typo'd rule prices
+// nothing), but the CALLER needs the list to say which rule to fix instead of
+// just "compile failed" — and to explain what the degraded table dropped.
+func UnmatchedRuleURLs(profile *config.BillingProfile, sources []config.Source) []string {
+	if profile == nil {
+		return nil
+	}
+	var out []string
+	for i := range profile.Rules {
+		rule := &profile.Rules[i]
+		if rule.URL == "*" {
+			continue
+		}
+		if len(matchSources(rule.URL, sources)) == 0 {
+			out = append(out, rule.URL)
+		}
+	}
+	return out
+}
+
 // matchSources returns the source names whose base_url matches pattern.
 // "*" matches every source (used as a catch-all default rule).
 func matchSources(pattern string, sources []config.Source) []string {
@@ -245,8 +266,23 @@ func applyRule(prices map[string]interface{}, rule *config.BillingRule, srcName
 		// model priced on its own, so the wildcard loses nothing.
 		if rule.URL != "*" {
 			if _, ok := prices["sources"].(map[string]interface{})[srcName]; !ok {
+				// ONLY the marker — deliberately no "prompt"/"completion".
+				//
+				// priceFor() applies the source dimension AFTER the model
+				// dimension, and treats a present source key as an override
+				// (`sp.prompt ~= nil` => out.prompt = sp.prompt). Writing
+				// zeros here therefore rewrote the model price of every model
+				// this rule DOES list to 0 — while out.priced stayed true, so
+				// unpriced_reqs never grew either. Cost 0, no warning: GitCode
+				// issue #1.
+				//
+				// `per_request: 0` is the marker itself: it adds nothing to a
+				// request's cost, but its presence makes the plugin see the
+				// source as priced, which is the only thing this entry is for.
+				// (free/subscription above keep their zero token prices: there
+				// the zero IS the statement.)
 				prices["sources"].(map[string]interface{})[srcName] = map[string]interface{}{
-					"prompt": 0.0, "completion": 0.0, "per_request": 0.0,
+					"per_request": 0.0,
 				}
 			}
 		}

internal/billing/wildcard_test.go

@@ -212,3 +212,105 @@ func TestLongContextStepCompiles(t *testing.T) {
 		t.Error("above=0 must be rejected")
 	}
 }
+
+// A specific-URL token rule marks its source priced, but the entry must carry
+// ONLY the "this source is priced" marker — not zero token prices.
+//
+// Why: `billing.lua`'s priceFor() applies the source dimension AFTER the model
+// dimension and treats `sp.prompt ~= nil` as an override. A {prompt:0,
+// completion:0} entry therefore zeroes the model price of every model the rule
+// DOES list. The symptom is silent: cost is 0 while out.priced is true, so
+// unpriced_reqs does not grow either (GitCode issue #1).
+//
+// The original test only asserted the KEY existed, which froze the broken shape
+// into a contract; this asserts the entry CONTENT.
+func TestSpecificURLTokenRuleSourceEntryHasNoZeroTokenPrices(t *testing.T) {
+	sources := []config.Source{{Name: "mine", BaseURL: "https://mine.example.com/v1"}}
+	profile := &config.BillingProfile{
+		ID: "p",
+		Rules: []config.BillingRule{{
+			URL: "https://mine.example.com/v1", Mode: "token",
+			Models: map[string]config.BillingToken{
+				"m": {Prompt: "0.15", Completion: "0.60"},
+			},
+		}},
+	}
+	prices, err := Compile(profile, sources)
+	if err != nil {
+		t.Fatalf("compile: %v", err)
+	}
+	entry, ok := prices["sources"].(map[string]interface{})["mine"].(map[string]interface{})
+	if !ok {
+		t.Fatal("a specific-url token rule must still mark its own source priced")
+	}
+	for _, key := range []string{"prompt", "completion"} {
+		if _, present := entry[key]; present {
+			t.Errorf("source entry carries %s=%v: priceFor() treats it as an override "+
+				"and zeroes the model price (issue #1)", key, entry[key])
+		}
+	}
+	// per_request: 0 is the marker itself: adding a flat fee must not change
+	// the total, and the key's presence is what tells the plugin "priced".
+	if v, present := entry["per_request"]; !present || v != 0.0 {
+		t.Errorf("source entry must carry per_request:0 as the priced marker, got %#v", entry)
+	}
+	// The model price must still be the real per-token value.
+	m, ok := prices["models"].(map[string]interface{})["m"].(map[string]interface{})
+	if !ok {
+		t.Fatal("model price missing")
+	}
+	if m["prompt"] != 0.15e-6 {
+		t.Errorf("model prompt price = %v, want 1.5e-7 per token", m["prompt"])
+	}
+}
+
+// free / subscription are DELIBERATE zeros: their source entries keep the
+// zero token prices, because there the zero IS the statement.
+func TestExplicitZeroModesKeepZeroTokenPrices(t *testing.T) {
+	for _, mode := range []string{"free", "subscription"} {
+		profile := &config.BillingProfile{ID: "p", Rules: []config.BillingRule{{
+			URL: "https://mine.example.com/v1", Mode: mode, Subscription: 10,
+		}}}
+		prices, err := Compile(profile, []config.Source{
+			{Name: "mine", BaseURL: "https://mine.example.com/v1"},
+		})
+		if err != nil {
+			t.Fatalf("%s compile: %v", mode, err)
+		}
+		entry, ok := prices["sources"].(map[string]interface{})["mine"].(map[string]interface{})
+		if !ok {
+			t.Fatalf("%s: source entry missing", mode)
+		}
+		for _, key := range []string{"prompt", "completion"} {
+			if v, present := entry[key]; !present || v != 0.0 {
+				t.Errorf("%s: entry[%s] = %v (present=%v), want an explicit 0.0",
+					mode, key, v, present)
+			}
+		}
+	}
+}
+
+// UnmatchedRuleURLs 是给调用方的"哪条规则写错了"清单：严格编译只会说
+// "compile failed"，而运维需要知道具体 URL；降级应用时也要能说明丢了什么。
+func TestUnmatchedRuleURLs(t *testing.T) {
+	sources := []config.Source{{Name: "mine", BaseURL: "https://mine.example.com/v1"}}
+	profile := &config.BillingProfile{
+		ID: "p",
+		Rules: []config.BillingRule{
+			{URL: "https://mine.example.com/v1", Mode: "free"},
+			{URL: "https://stale.example.com/v1", Mode: "free"},
+			{URL: "*", Mode: "token", Models: map[string]config.BillingToken{
+				"m": {Prompt: "1", Completion: "1"},
+			}},
+			{URL: "https://mine.example.com/v1/", Mode: "free"}, // 尾斜杠归一后匹配
+		},
+	}
+	got := UnmatchedRuleURLs(profile, sources)
+	if len(got) != 1 || got[0] != "https://stale.example.com/v1" {
+		t.Fatalf("unmatched = %v, want only the stale URL (wildcard and trailing-slash "+
+			"variants must not be reported)", got)
+	}
+	if nil != UnmatchedRuleURLs(nil, sources) {
+		t.Error("nil profile must yield nil")
+	}
+}

internal/config/config.go

@@ -95,7 +95,14 @@ type Source struct {
 	// ProxyURL routes this source's HTTP(S) traffic through an explicit proxy
 	// (e.g. http://127.0.0.1:7890). Empty = direct connection. Needed for
 	// upstreams behind geo/IP blocks that only respond through a proxy.
-	ProxyURL      string                 `yaml:"proxy_url" json:"proxy_url,omitempty"`
+	ProxyURL string `yaml:"proxy_url" json:"proxy_url,omitempty"`
+	// Retry is an OPTIONAL upstream retry policy. It exists for upstreams that
+	// answer a business-level rejection with a status code the kernel would
+	// otherwise surface to the client — e.g. a per-account concurrency cap that
+	// clears by itself after tens of seconds. The kernel stays vendor-agnostic:
+	// the matcher is pure DATA (status list + response-body substrings), so no
+	// provider name ever appears in core.
+	Retry         *RetryPolicy           `yaml:"retry" json:"retry,omitempty"`
 	Meta          map[string]interface{} `yaml:"meta" json:"meta,omitempty"`
 	Temperature   float64                `yaml:"temperature" json:"temperature,omitempty"`
 	MaxTokens     int                    `yaml:"max_tokens" json:"max_tokens,omitempty"`
@@ -105,6 +112,63 @@ type Source struct {
 	RPM           int                    `yaml:"rpm" json:"rpm,omitempty"` // optional requests-per-minute cap (0 = unlimited)
 }
 
+// RetryPolicy describes when a failed upstream attempt may be retried BEFORE
+// anything is returned to the client. All conditions are data:
+//
+//	OnStatus       - retry only when the HTTP status is one of these
+//	OnBodyContains - ... AND the response body contains one of these substrings
+//	                 (empty = status alone decides)
+//	Delay          - wait between attempts ("10s" etc.); parsed on demand
+//	MaxAttempts    - TOTAL attempts including the first (1 or 0 = no retry)
+//
+// Scope: the retry happens inside one gateway request, so a stream is only
+// retried before its first chunk reaches the client (the kernel already holds
+// the first chunk back), and a non-stream call is retried as a whole.
+type RetryPolicy struct {
+	OnStatus       []int    `yaml:"on_status,omitempty" json:"on_status,omitempty"`
+	OnBodyContains []string `yaml:"on_body_contains,omitempty" json:"on_body_contains,omitempty"`
+	Delay          string   `yaml:"delay,omitempty" json:"delay,omitempty"`
+	MaxAttempts    int      `yaml:"max_attempts,omitempty" json:"max_attempts,omitempty"`
+}
+
+// ShouldRetry reports whether one failed attempt matches this policy.
+func (r *RetryPolicy) ShouldRetry(status int, body string) bool {
+	if r == nil || r.MaxAttempts <= 1 {
+		return false
+	}
+	statusOK := len(r.OnStatus) == 0
+	for _, s := range r.OnStatus {
+		if s == status {
+			statusOK = true
+			break
+		}
+	}
+	if !statusOK {
+		return false
+	}
+	if len(r.OnBodyContains) == 0 {
+		return true
+	}
+	for _, sub := range r.OnBodyContains {
+		if sub != "" && strings.Contains(body, sub) {
+			return true
+		}
+	}
+	return false
+}
+
+// DelayDuration is the configured pause between attempts (default 10s).
+func (r *RetryPolicy) DelayDuration() time.Duration {
+	if r == nil || r.Delay == "" {
+		return 10 * time.Second
+	}
+	d, err := time.ParseDuration(r.Delay)
+	if err != nil || d < 0 {
+		return 10 * time.Second
+	}
+	return d
+}
+
 // Load reads and validates a config file. When the file does not exist yet a
 // default config is generated at that path first (first-run bootstrap), so a
 // fresh binary just works: `llmsproxy -config /path/to/config.yaml`.

internal/config/retry_policy_test.go

@@ -0,0 +1,59 @@
+package config
+
+import (
+	"testing"
+	"time"
+)
+
+// ShouldRetry 是纯数据判据：状态码列表 + 响应体子串。它决定"这次失败值不值得
+// 在网关内部等一会儿重试"。厂商知识绝不能进内核，所以判据必须能用一个表格测清楚。
+func TestRetryPolicyShouldRetry(t *testing.T) {
+	cases := []struct {
+		name   string
+		policy *RetryPolicy
+		status int
+		body   string
+		want   bool
+	}{
+		{"nil policy", nil, 500, "anything", false},
+		{"max_attempts=1 disables", &RetryPolicy{OnStatus: []int{400}, MaxAttempts: 1}, 400, "x", false},
+		{"status matches, no body filter",
+			&RetryPolicy{OnStatus: []int{429}, MaxAttempts: 3}, 429, "", true},
+		{"status mismatch",
+			&RetryPolicy{OnStatus: []int{429}, MaxAttempts: 3}, 400, "429", false},
+		{"status + body match",
+			&RetryPolicy{OnStatus: []int{400}, OnBodyContains: []string{"TM.00001041"}, MaxAttempts: 3},
+			400, `{"error_code":"TM.00001041"}`, true},
+		{"status matches but body does not",
+			&RetryPolicy{OnStatus: []int{400}, OnBodyContains: []string{"TM.00001041"}, MaxAttempts: 3},
+			400, `{"error_code":"TM.00001005"}`, false},
+		{"empty substring never matches",
+			&RetryPolicy{OnStatus: []int{400}, OnBodyContains: []string{""}, MaxAttempts: 3}, 400, "x", false},
+		{"any of several body signals",
+			&RetryPolicy{OnStatus: []int{400, 429}, OnBodyContains: []string{"TM.00001041", "TPM limit"}, MaxAttempts: 3},
+			429, `{"message":"TPM limit exceeded"}`, true},
+	}
+	for _, tc := range cases {
+		if got := tc.policy.ShouldRetry(tc.status, tc.body); got != tc.want {
+			t.Errorf("%s: ShouldRetry(%d, %q) = %v, want %v", tc.name, tc.status, tc.body, got, tc.want)
+		}
+	}
+}
+
+func TestRetryPolicyDelay(t *testing.T) {
+	cases := []struct {
+		name   string
+		policy *RetryPolicy
+		want   time.Duration
+	}{
+		{"nil", nil, 10 * time.Second},
+		{"explicit", &RetryPolicy{Delay: "250ms"}, 250 * time.Millisecond},
+		{"garbage falls back", &RetryPolicy{Delay: "not-a-duration"}, 10 * time.Second},
+		{"negative falls back", &RetryPolicy{Delay: "-5s"}, 10 * time.Second},
+	}
+	for _, tc := range cases {
+		if got := tc.policy.DelayDuration(); got != tc.want {
+			t.Errorf("%s: DelayDuration() = %v, want %v", tc.name, got, tc.want)
+		}
+	}
+}

internal/core/billing_apply_test.go

@@ -0,0 +1,60 @@
+package core
+
+import (
+	"path/filepath"
+	"testing"
+
+	"llmsproxy/internal/config"
+)
+
+// 一个过期的规则 URL 不得让**整个**计费 profile 失效。
+//
+// 真实事故（GitCode issue #1 排查中发现，生产现网）：config.yaml 里
+// `billing.rules[0].url` 是 `https://opencode.ai/inference/v1`，而该源的
+// base_url 已是 `.../inference/openai/v1`。严格编译因此返回
+// "rule url ... matches no configured source base_url"，applyBillingDSL 直接
+// return —— 于是**所有**计费规则都不生效：账单恒为 0、unpriced_reqs 涨到 3.7 万，
+// 而唯一的痕迹是一行启动日志。这正是「静默少报」最严重的一种。
+//
+// 修法：严格编译失败时降级为 lenient（用能匹配的规则），并打 ERROR 说明后果。
+// 一个 URL 写错不该把整个价目表一起葬送；但也不能装作成功。
+func TestBillingStaleRuleURLStillAppliesOtherRules(t *testing.T) {
+	cfg := newTestConfig(t)
+	dir := t.TempDir()
+	cfg.PluginDir = filepath.Join(dir, "plugins")
+	cfg.Sources = []config.Source{
+		{Name: "localzen", BaseURL: "https://opencode.ai/inference/openai/v1", Adapter: "openai",
+			Models: []config.Model{{ID: "m"}}},
+	}
+	cfg.BillingDSL = &config.BillingDSL{
+		Active: "p",
+		Profiles: []config.BillingProfile{{
+			ID: "p",
+			Rules: []config.BillingRule{
+				// 过期 URL：没有任何源的 base_url 与它相等
+				{URL: "https://opencode.ai/inference/v1", Mode: "free"},
+				// 有效规则：必须仍然生效
+				{URL: "https://opencode.ai/inference/openai/v1", Mode: "free"},
+			},
+		}},
+	}
+	c := newTestCore(t, cfg)
+	c.applyBillingDSL()
+
+	raw := c.plugins.Prices("billing")
+	if raw == nil {
+		t.Fatal("billing has no price table (profile never applied)")
+	}
+	prices, ok := raw.(map[string]interface{})
+	if !ok {
+		t.Fatalf("price table shape: %#v", raw)
+	}
+	sources, ok := prices["sources"].(map[string]interface{})
+	if !ok {
+		t.Fatalf("prices has no sources: %#v", prices)
+	}
+	if _, ok := sources["localzen"]; !ok {
+		t.Fatalf("一条过期规则 URL 把整个 profile 弄失效了：有效的 free 规则也没有生效，"+
+			"结果是账单恒为 0 且没有告警。prices=%#v", prices)
+	}
+}

internal/core/channels_platforms_logged_in_test.go

@@ -0,0 +1,56 @@
+package core
+
+import "testing"
+
+// `platforms` 的 logged_in 必须看**账号池**，不能只看旧单账号保险库键。
+//
+// 真实缺陷（2026-10-20 用户报「codearts 还是不可用」）：
+// `list_platforms` 当时写的是 `credentialOf("channels:" .. id)` —— 那是旧版
+// 单账号的键；而现网凭据键是 `channels:<platform>:<accountId>`（一平台多账号）。
+// 于是**所有**通过账号池接入的平台都被判成未登录，UI 把渠道卡片渲染成"未接入"，
+// 用户看到的正是"渠道不可用"，而底层模型其实完全能用。
+//
+// 判据钉两层：池里的账号让 logged_in=true，且账号标识能被 UI 拿到。
+func TestPlatformsLoggedInFromAccountPool(t *testing.T) {
+	_, ps := poolCore(t)
+	if _, err := ps.Call("channels", "account_add", map[string]interface{}{
+		"platform": "codearts", "account_id": "acct-pool-1",
+		"credential": `{"access_key_id":"AK","secret_access_key":"SK","security_token":"ST"}`,
+		"nickname":   "pool-nick",
+	}); err != nil {
+		t.Fatalf("account_add: %v", err)
+	}
+	// list_platforms 是 HTTP 路由处理器（不在 plugin.exports 里），走探针取同一份数据
+	m, err := ps.Call("channels", "__platforms_probe", map[string]interface{}{})
+	if err != nil {
+		t.Fatalf("__platforms_probe: %v", err)
+	}
+	w, _ := m.(map[string]interface{})
+	j, _ := w["json"].(map[string]interface{})
+	arr, _ := j["platforms"].([]interface{})
+	if len(arr) == 0 {
+		t.Fatalf("platforms 不应为空")
+	}
+	var got map[string]interface{}
+	for _, raw := range arr {
+		p, _ := raw.(map[string]interface{})
+		if p["id"] == "codearts" {
+			got = p
+		}
+	}
+	if got == nil {
+		t.Fatalf("platforms 里找不到 codearts")
+	}
+	if got["logged_in"] != true {
+		t.Fatalf("账号池里有凭据的账号，logged_in 必须为 true；实得 %#v", got)
+	}
+	if got["account_id"] != "acct-pool-1" {
+		t.Errorf("account_id 应回池里的账号 id；实得 %#v", got["account_id"])
+	}
+	if got["account"] != "pool-nick" {
+		t.Errorf("account 应回池里的昵称；实得 %#v", got["account"])
+	}
+	if s, _ := got["accounts"].(float64); s < 1 {
+		t.Errorf("accounts 计数应 >=1；实得 %#v", got["accounts"])
+	}
+}

internal/core/channels_trae_catalog_test.go

@@ -120,23 +120,23 @@ func newTraeCatalogHarness(t *testing.T, onBody func(string)) *traeCatalogHarnes
 			// ① solo_agent：glm-5.2 有档位；另有三个必被硬性过滤的条目
 			`{"function":"solo_agent","config_info_list":[`+
 			`{"config_name":"glm-5.2","usage":"chat_completion","config_switch":true,`+
-			`"reasoning_effort_config":{"support_thinking":true,"options":["high","low"]}},`+
+			`"reasoning_effort_config":{"support_thinking":true,"options":["high","low"]}}`+
+			`]},`+
+			// ② solo_work_lite 排在**后面**：glm-5.2 在这里**没有**档位配置。
+			//    另三个"必被过滤"的条目也放这里 —— 生产里适配器恒发这条通道，
+			//    硬性过滤的判据必须在这条通道上被验证到（放 solo_agent 会因为
+			//    admit_functions 策略先行剔除，测试就测不到过滤逻辑了）。
+			`{"function":"solo_work_lite","config_info_list":[`+
+			`{"config_name":"glm-5.2","usage":"chat_completion","config_switch":true},`+
 			`{"config_name":"summary-model","usage":"summary","config_switch":true},`+
 			`{"config_name":"disabled-model","usage":"chat_completion","config_switch":false},`+
 			`{"config_name":"hidden-model","usage":"chat_completion","config_switch":true,"is_invisible_to_user":true},`+
 			`{"config_name":"no-function-model","usage":"chat_completion","config_switch":true},`+
-			// is_custom_model=true ⇒ 上游以流内 4001 拒绝（"仅可见但不可调用"）
 			`{"config_name":"custom-flag-model","usage":"chat_completion","config_switch":true,`+
 			`"display_config":{"is_custom_model":true}},`+
-			// 对照组：名字带 custom_model_ 前缀但**标志为 false** ⇒ 必须**保留**
-			// （参考点名：判据是标志的值，不是模型名）
 			`{"config_name":"custom_model_prefix_but_ok","usage":"chat_completion","config_switch":true,`+
 			`"display_config":{"is_custom_model":false}}`+
 			`]},`+
-			// ② solo_work_lite 排在**后面**：glm-5.2 在这里**没有**档位配置
-			`{"function":"solo_work_lite","config_info_list":[`+
-			`{"config_name":"glm-5.2","usage":"chat_completion","config_switch":true}`+
-			`]},`+
 			// ③ 白名单外通道：整组必须被丢弃
 			`{"function":"inline_chat","config_info_list":[`+
 			`{"config_name":"only-in-bad-channel","usage":"chat_completion","config_switch":true}`+

internal/core/core.go

@@ -1057,14 +1057,60 @@ func (c *Core) applyBillingDSL() {
 	}
 	prices, err := billing.Compile(profile, c.cfg.Sources)
 	if err != nil {
-		log.Printf("[billing] profile %q not applied: %v", profile.ID, err)
-		return
+		// ONE stale rule URL must not take the whole price table down with it.
+		//
+		// The strict compiler rejects a profile whose rule matches no source,
+		// which is right for catching typos — but the runtime consequence used
+		// to be a bare `return`: every rule stopped applying, the bill came out
+		// at 0 and unpriced_reqs grew forever, with a single startup log line as
+		// the only trace. Found in production while fixing GitCode issue #1
+		// (a rule still pointed at .../inference/v1 after the source moved to
+		// .../inference/openai/v1; 37k requests had been recorded as unpriced).
+		//
+		// So: apply the rules that DO match, and say exactly what was dropped.
+		// The profile still fails loudly — it just no longer fails silently for
+		// everything else.
+		lenient, lerr := billing.CompileOpts(profile, c.cfg.Sources, true)
+		if lerr != nil {
+			log.Printf("[billing] profile %q not applied: %v (lenient retry also failed: %v)",
+				profile.ID, err, lerr)
+			return
+		}
+		def := profile.Default
+		if def == "" {
+			def = "unpriced"
+		}
+		log.Printf("[billing] ERROR profile %q has %d rule URL(s) matching no configured "+
+			"source: %v — applied the remaining %d rule(s); unmatched traffic falls through "+
+			"to default=%q and keeps counting in unpriced_reqs. FIX THE RULE URL: a stale URL "+
+			"used to zero out the entire price table.", profile.ID,
+			len(billing.UnmatchedRuleURLs(profile, c.cfg.Sources)),
+			billing.UnmatchedRuleURLs(profile, c.cfg.Sources),
+			len(profile.Rules)-len(billing.UnmatchedRuleURLs(profile, c.cfg.Sources)), def)
+		prices = lenient
 	}
 	if err := ps.SetState("billing", map[string]interface{}{"prices": prices}); err != nil {
 		log.Printf("[billing] applying profile %q: %v", profile.ID, err)
 		return
 	}
 	log.Printf("[billing] profile %q applied (%d rules, %d sources)", profile.ID, len(profile.Rules), len(c.cfg.Sources))
+	// unmatched_sources used to be written by the compiler and read by nobody,
+	// so a profile that silently left half the gateway unpriced looked applied
+	// and healthy. Logging it is the cheap reader: an operator who sees source
+	// names here knows exactly which rules to add (GitCode issue #1 follow-up).
+	if unmatched, ok := prices["unmatched_sources"].([]string); ok && len(unmatched) > 0 {
+		log.Printf("[billing] WARNING %d source(s) match no rule and fall through to the "+
+			"profile default: %v (add rules, or set `default: free` if that is intended)",
+			len(unmatched), unmatched)
+	} else if raw, ok := prices["unmatched_sources"].([]interface{}); ok && len(raw) > 0 {
+		names := make([]string, 0, len(raw))
+		for _, v := range raw {
+			names = append(names, fmt.Sprint(v))
+		}
+		log.Printf("[billing] WARNING %d source(s) match no rule and fall through to the "+
+			"profile default: %v (add rules, or set `default: free` if that is intended)",
+			len(names), names)
+	}
 }
 
 // ValidateScopeQuotas checks every scope entry's caps before they are stored.

internal/gateway/billing_rules_api_test.go

@@ -236,19 +236,39 @@ func TestBillingRulesPersistAndReachThePlugin(t *testing.T) {
 	if _, ok := sources["localzen"]; !ok {
 		t.Errorf("the free rule did not reach the plugin: %v", keysOf(sources))
 	}
-	// The injected price must be per-token, i.e. 0.15 USD/M => 1.5e-7.
+	// The source entry exists ONLY as the "this source is priced" marker: it
+	// must not carry token prices, because priceFor() applies the source
+	// dimension after the model dimension and would overwrite the model price
+	// with 0 (GitCode issue #1 — silent, unpriced_reqs does not grow either).
+	if entry, ok := cc.(map[string]interface{}); ok {
+		for _, key := range []string{"prompt", "completion"} {
+			if _, present := entry[key]; present {
+				t.Errorf("the injected source entry carries %s: it will zero the "+
+					"model price (issue #1): %#v", key, entry)
+			}
+		}
+	}
+	// The injected MODEL price must be per-token, i.e. 0.15 USD/M => 1.5e-7.
 	// Asserting the exact magnitude catches a unit error (per-million vs
 	// per-token), which would be off by a factor of a million and still look
 	// like "a number".
-	models, ok := cc.(map[string]interface{})["models"].(map[string]interface{})
-	if ok {
-		if m, ok := models["deepseek-v4.1-flash"].(map[string]interface{}); ok {
-			p, _ := m["prompt"].(float64)
-			if p <= 0 || p > 1e-6 {
-				t.Errorf("injected prompt price = %v, want per-token (~1.5e-7); "+
-					"a per-million value here would over-bill by 1e6x", p)
-			}
-		}
+	//
+	// ⚠️ This used to read `cc["models"]`, but `models` lives at
+	// prices["models"], not inside a source entry — so the type assertion was
+	// always false and the whole block was skipped. It had never run, which is
+	// how a per-million unit error could survive a test whose comment claims
+	// to catch exactly that.
+	models, ok := prices["models"].(map[string]interface{})
+	if !ok {
+		t.Fatalf("prices has no models map: %#v", prices)
+	}
+	m, ok := models["deepseek-v4.1-flash"].(map[string]interface{})
+	if !ok {
+		t.Fatalf("the model price was not injected: %v", keysOf(models))
+	}
+	if p, _ := m["prompt"].(float64); p <= 0 || p > 1e-6 {
+		t.Errorf("injected prompt price = %v, want per-token (~1.5e-7); "+
+			"a per-million value here would over-bill by 1e6x", p)
 	}
 }
 

internal/gateway/discover_mutate_test.go

@@ -126,7 +126,12 @@ func TestRealMutants(t *testing.T) {
 		},
 		{
 			name: "nested metadata no longer read",
-			from: "\tcopyFields(m.Metadata)      // nested first",
+			// 锚点必须与 discover.go 逐字节一致：此前这里是 6 个空格，源码已
+			// 变成 2 个空格，于是这条变异永远"找不到锚点"——变异campaign 每次
+			// 都以 anchor not found 失败，而它本该验证"嵌套 metadata 被丢掉"能被
+			// 测试抓住。锚点漂移 = 这条变异从未真正跑过（和 issue #1 里
+			// `cc["models"]` 恒 false 的测试跳过是同一种失效：断言写了但没执行）。
+			from: "\tcopyFields(m.Metadata)  // nested first",
 			to:   "\tcopyFields(json.RawMessage(nil)) // mutant: nested metadata dropped",
 		},
 		{

internal/lua/billing_test.go

@@ -1236,3 +1236,122 @@ func TestLongContextComposesWithCacheDiscount(t *testing.T) {
 	// total                             = 0.2325
 	approx(t, "step composes with cache discount", got, 0.2325)
 }
+
+// ---- 源层零价覆盖模型价（issue #1）---------------------------------------
+//
+// 真实缺陷（GitCode issue #1）：`compile.go` 给每条**具体 URL** 的 token 规则
+// 写一条 `{prompt:0, completion:0, per_request:0}` 的源条目，本意只是"标记该源
+// 已定价"；而插件 priceFor() 的源层是**无条件覆盖**模型层：`sp.prompt ~= nil`
+// 就把模型价改成 0。两条各自正当的规则叠加 ⇒ 每个请求 cost:0，且因为
+// out.priced=true，连 unpriced_reqs 都不涨 —— 完全静默。
+//
+// 这里把两种条目形状都钉住：旧形状必须**真的是错的**（A 行），新形状必须
+// **保住模型价同时仍算"已定价"**（B 行）。只断言"键存在"是不够的 —— 那正是
+// 现有测试把错误形状固化成契约的原因。
+func TestBillingSourceZeroPriceMustNotZeroModelPrice(t *testing.T) {
+	const promptPrice = 1.5e-7   // 0.15 USD/M
+	const completionPrice = 6e-7 // 0.60 USD/M
+	const want = 0.75            // 1e6 * 1.5e-7 + 1e6 * 6e-7
+
+	newPrices := func(sourceEntry map[string]interface{}) map[string]interface{} {
+		return map[string]interface{}{
+			"default": map[string]interface{}{"prompt": 0.0, "completion": 0.0, "per_request": 0.0},
+			"models": map[string]interface{}{
+				"m": map[string]interface{}{"prompt": promptPrice, "completion": completionPrice},
+			},
+			"sources": map[string]interface{}{"src": sourceEntry},
+		}
+	}
+	run := func(t *testing.T, sourceEntry map[string]interface{}) (cost, unpriced float64) {
+		t.Helper()
+		ps, _ := billingVM(t)
+		_ = ps.SetState("billing", map[string]interface{}{"prices": newPrices(sourceEntry)})
+		ps.Fire(StageRequestEnd, map[string]interface{}{
+			"model": "m", "source": "src", "key": "***p", "ok": true,
+			"prompt_tokens": 1000000.0, "completion_tokens": 1000000.0,
+			"time": 1750000000000,
+		})
+		st := stateOf(t, ps)
+		total := st["total"].(map[string]interface{})
+		return total["cost"].(float64), st["unpriced_reqs"].(float64)
+	}
+
+	// A 行：compile.go 修复前的形状 —— 这是缺陷本身，必须算成 0。
+	cost, unpriced := run(t, map[string]interface{}{
+		"prompt": 0.0, "completion": 0.0, "per_request": 0.0,
+	})
+	approx(t, "旧形状(全零源条目) cost", cost, 0)
+	if unpriced != 0 {
+		t.Errorf("旧形状下 unpriced_reqs = %v，缺陷正是它也为 0（静默）", unpriced)
+	}
+
+	// B 行：修复后的形状 —— 只带 per_request，不得覆盖模型价。
+	cost, unpriced = run(t, map[string]interface{}{"per_request": 0.0})
+	approx(t, "新形状(仅 per_request) cost", cost, want)
+	if unpriced != 0 {
+		t.Errorf("新形状下 unpriced_reqs = %v，want 0（该源仍算已定价）", unpriced)
+	}
+}
+
+// 同一源上一个**未列入价目表**的模型：源条目（仅 per_request）让它保持
+// "已定价"，所以不会被计入 unpriced_reqs —— 这正是 compile 写源条目的原意。
+func TestBillingSourceEntryStillMarksUnlistedModelPriced(t *testing.T) {
+	ps, _ := billingVM(t)
+	_ = ps.SetState("billing", map[string]interface{}{
+		"prices": map[string]interface{}{
+			"default": map[string]interface{}{"prompt": 0.0, "completion": 0.0, "per_request": 0.0},
+			"models": map[string]interface{}{
+				"priced-model": map[string]interface{}{"prompt": 1.5e-7, "completion": 6e-7},
+			},
+			"sources": map[string]interface{}{
+				"src": map[string]interface{}{"per_request": 0.0},
+			},
+		},
+	})
+	ps.Fire(StageRequestEnd, map[string]interface{}{
+		"model": "unlisted-model", "source": "src", "key": "***p", "ok": true,
+		"prompt_tokens": 1000.0, "completion_tokens": 0.0, "time": 1750000000000,
+	})
+	st := stateOf(t, ps)
+	if got := st["unpriced_reqs"].(float64); got != 0 {
+		t.Errorf("unpriced_reqs = %v，want 0：源条目存在即为已定价源", got)
+	}
+}
+
+// profile 级 default（compile.go 写入的 default_mode）必须真的生效。
+//
+// 真实缺陷（GitCode issue #1 顺带发现）：compile.go:54 写 `default_mode`、
+// :104 写 `unmatched_sources`，但全仓库没有任何读取方 —— 于是 profile 的
+// `default: free|unpriced` 在运行时完全等价，区别只存在于 YAML 里。
+// "free" 是**刻意定价为 0**，不该进未定价统计；"unpriced" 才该。
+func TestBillingProfileDefaultMode(t *testing.T) {
+	cases := []struct {
+		mode         string
+		wantUnpriced float64
+	}{
+		{"free", 0},
+		{"unpriced", 1},
+		{"", 1}, // 未声明 = 现有行为（未定价债务）
+	}
+	for _, tc := range cases {
+		ps, _ := billingVM(t)
+		prices := map[string]interface{}{
+			"default": map[string]interface{}{"prompt": 0.0, "completion": 0.0, "per_request": 0.0},
+		}
+		if tc.mode != "" {
+			prices["default_mode"] = tc.mode
+		}
+		_ = ps.SetState("billing", map[string]interface{}{"prices": prices})
+		ps.Fire(StageRequestEnd, map[string]interface{}{
+			"model": "no-rule-model", "source": "no-rule-source", "key": "***p", "ok": true,
+			"prompt_tokens": 1000.0, "completion_tokens": 10.0, "time": 1750000000000,
+		})
+		st := stateOf(t, ps)
+		if got := st["unpriced_reqs"].(float64); got != tc.wantUnpriced {
+			t.Errorf("default_mode=%q: unpriced_reqs = %v, want %v", tc.mode, got, tc.wantUnpriced)
+		}
+		// 无论哪种模式，成本都是 0；区别只在"是否算未定价债务"。
+		approx(t, "default_mode="+tc.mode+" cost",
+			st["total"].(map[string]interface{})["cost"].(float64), 0)
+	}
+}

internal/lua/plugins/billing.lua

@@ -189,7 +189,11 @@ local function priceFor(payload)
   -- look the same: an unpriced model silently costing 0 is the most dangerous
   -- failure mode a cost plugin has, because the bill still adds up and just
   -- quietly under-reports. It is counted separately and surfaced in the UI.
-  out = {
+  -- ★ local 是必须的：此前写的是全局 `out = {`，而 priceFor 每个请求都会调用，
+  -- 于是这个表挂在 VM 级全局变量上跨请求残留/泄漏（GitCode issue #1 顺带发现）。
+  -- 功能上因为每次整体重建而侥幸正确，但它是共享可变状态，任何提前 return 或
+  -- 后续分支忘了重建都会让上一单的价格漏到下一单 —— 计费错误不会报错。
+  local out = {
     prompt = d.prompt or 0, completion = d.completion or 0,
     per_request = 0, cache_discount = d.cache_discount, peak = d.peak,
       -- nil = bill reasoning at the completion rate, which is what every
@@ -236,6 +240,18 @@ local function priceFor(payload)
     if kp.cache_discount ~= nil then out.cache_discount = kp.cache_discount end
     if kp.peak ~= nil then out.peak = kp.peak end
   end
+
+  -- profile-level default for sources no rule matched.
+  --
+  -- compile.go has always written `default_mode` ("free" | "unpriced") into the
+  -- prices table, but NOTHING read it — so `default: free` and
+  -- `default: unpriced` behaved identically at runtime (both fell through to
+  -- prices.default's zeros and counted as unpriced debt). That is a second
+  -- silent under-report (GitCode issue #1 follow-up). "free" is a DELIBERATE
+  -- zero, so it must be marked priced; anything else stays countable debt.
+  if not out.priced and p.default_mode == "free" then
+    out.priced = true
+  end
   return out
 end
 

internal/lua/plugins/channels.lua

@@ -140,7 +140,7 @@ plugin.kernel = {
 
 -- WebUI 可调用的导出函数（POST /api/plugins/channels/call/{fn}）。
 -- set_endpoints 让运维把渠道端点指向自建代理/镜像；测试用它打假上游。
-plugin.exports = { "set_endpoints", "account_add", "account_list", "account_update", "account_clear_credentialless", "account_delete", "account_test", "account_refresh", "account_reorder", "account_reset", "account_retest", "account_adopt", "model_list", "model_refresh", "model_set_disabled", "model_set_disabled_many", "model_set_all_disabled", "model_clear_dead", "provider_status", "provider_set_enabled", "provider_get_order", "provider_set_order", "credits_claim_all", "credits_status", "credits_balances", "credits_pool_reason", "credits_permanent_lock", "backup_export", "backup_import", "backup_status", "auto_checkin", "gateway_get_enabled", "gateway_set_enabled", "usage_token_ledger", "usage_badge", "usage_badge_preference", "onboarding_status", "onboarding_claim", "__trae_derive_probe", "__codearts_sign_probe", "__qoder_machine_probe", "__qoder_refresh_probe", "__codearts_dpop_probe", "__codearts_cred_probe", "__codearts_adapter_sign_probe", "__sync_source_probe", "__trae_solo_probe", "__adapter_install_probe", "__store_dir_probe", "__set_loopback_probe", "reap_loopbacks", "reap_orphan_sources", "__add_source_for_test", "__forget_account_probe", "__set_pool_cred_probe", "__cred_headers_probe", "__b64_probe", "__codearts_jwk_pem_probe", "__platform_def_probe", "__zcode_diag_probe", "__trae_entry_probe", "__trae_catalog_probe", "__trae_headers_probe", "__list_sources_probe", "__clear_priorities_probe", "__resync_sources_probe", "__utf8_clip_probe", "__event_log_probe", "__is_model_gone_probe", "__rank_accounts_probe", "__chosen_account_probe", "__inject_refresh_platform_probe", "__clear_capabilities_probe", "__qoder_claim_outcome_probe", "__is_free_probe", "__claim_covers_probe", "__schedule_probe", "__parse_capability_probe", "__inject_capability_probe", "__ttl_reset_probe", "__ttl_probe", "__ttl_invalidate_probe", "__serial_probe", "__serial_release_probe", "__set_legacy_cred_probe", "__read_cred_probe", "__clear_all_creds_probe", "credits_tier_probe", "__set_lock_permanent_probe", "__set_expiring_window_probe", "__expiring_window_probe", "__record_dead_probe", "__catalog_gate_probe", "__catalog_gate_fail_probe", "credits_capability", "claims_capable" }
+plugin.exports = { "set_endpoints", "account_add", "account_list", "account_update", "account_clear_credentialless", "account_delete", "account_test", "account_refresh", "account_reorder", "account_reset", "account_retest", "account_adopt", "model_list", "model_refresh", "model_set_disabled", "model_set_disabled_many", "model_set_all_disabled", "model_clear_dead", "provider_status", "provider_set_enabled", "provider_get_order", "provider_set_order", "credits_claim_all", "credits_status", "credits_balances", "credits_pool_reason", "credits_permanent_lock", "backup_export", "backup_import", "backup_status", "auto_checkin", "gateway_get_enabled", "gateway_set_enabled", "usage_token_ledger", "usage_badge", "usage_badge_preference", "onboarding_status", "onboarding_claim", "__trae_derive_probe", "__codearts_sign_probe", "__qoder_machine_probe", "__qoder_refresh_probe", "__codearts_dpop_probe", "__codearts_cred_probe", "__codearts_adapter_sign_probe", "__sync_source_probe", "__trae_solo_probe", "__adapter_install_probe", "__store_dir_probe", "__set_loopback_probe", "reap_loopbacks", "reap_orphan_sources", "__add_source_for_test", "__forget_account_probe", "__set_pool_cred_probe", "__cred_headers_probe", "__b64_probe", "__codearts_jwk_pem_probe", "__platform_def_probe", "__zcode_diag_probe", "__trae_entry_probe", "__trae_catalog_probe", "__trae_headers_probe", "__platforms_probe", "__list_sources_probe", "__clear_priorities_probe", "__resync_sources_probe", "__utf8_clip_probe", "__event_log_probe", "__is_model_gone_probe", "__rank_accounts_probe", "__chosen_account_probe", "__inject_refresh_platform_probe", "__clear_capabilities_probe", "__qoder_claim_outcome_probe", "__is_free_probe", "__claim_covers_probe", "__schedule_probe", "__parse_capability_probe", "__inject_capability_probe", "__ttl_reset_probe", "__ttl_probe", "__ttl_invalidate_probe", "__serial_probe", "__serial_release_probe", "__set_legacy_cred_probe", "__read_cred_probe", "__clear_all_creds_probe", "credits_tier_probe", "__set_lock_permanent_probe", "__set_expiring_window_probe", "__expiring_window_probe", "__record_dead_probe", "__catalog_gate_probe", "__catalog_gate_fail_probe", "credits_capability", "claims_capable" }
 
 
 
@@ -1046,6 +1046,24 @@ local PLATFORMS = {
     base_url = "https://snap-access.cn-north-4.myhuaweicloud.com",
     -- 本插件**自己装的**适配器（见 installCodeartsAdapter）：华为云 AK/SK 签名
     adapter = "codearts",
+    -- ★ 上游的"不可用"多数是**账号级限流**，约 1 分钟自愈，不是模型坏了：
+    --   * 400 `TM.00001041: 并发会话数已达上限(3个)` —— 账户并发会话上限，
+    --     实测最后一个请求结束后约 44~60 秒释放；
+    --   * 429 `TPM limit ... 500000 tokens per minute` —— 每分钟 token 配额。
+    -- 内核原本**只在 429 上做冷却、不重试**，于是这类"等一会儿就好"的拒绝
+    -- 直接冒到客户端（流式还表现为 `empty stream`，因为上游用 HTTP 200 +
+    -- error 帧表达拒绝）。
+    --
+    -- 这里声明**声明式重试策略**（内核只按数据匹配，不认识 CodeArts）：
+    -- 命中即在网关内部每 10s 重试一次，最多 18 次（≈3 分钟），客户端只是
+    -- 多等几秒，不会看到错误。流式只在**握手阶段**重试（首帧尚未下发），
+    -- 不会重复输出。
+    retry_policy = {
+      on_status = { 400, 429 },
+      on_body_contains = { "TM.00001041", "TPM limit", "并发会话数已达上限" },
+      delay = "10s",
+      max_attempts = 18,
+    },
     -- 签名平台：源注册要交**完整凭据 JSON**（适配器自己解 AK/SK 签名），
     -- 不是裸 access token。见 syncAccountSource 的注释。
     credential_shape = "full",
@@ -3780,6 +3798,23 @@ local function effectiveModels(provider)
   -- 进源只会让客户端选中后报错（trae 的 custom_model_* 槽位就是这类）。
   local unavailable = {}
   for _, m in ipairs(plat.models_unavailable or {}) do unavailable[m] = true end
+  -- ★ admit_functions：只放行**本适配器真的会发**的通道里的模型。
+  --
+  -- 白名单（parse 里的 rankOf）只说明"该通道在本端点下可调用"，不等于
+  -- "适配器会发它"。trae 适配器恒发 solo_work_lite，别的通道的模型经我们
+  -- 这条路发出去要么回空内容、要么被上游悄悄回落到默认模型（实测
+  -- kimi-k2.8-preview / deepseek-V3 空回，sagitta 自称 Claude、aquila 自称
+  -- GPT）—— 那正是用户说的"模型不正确"。
+  --
+  -- 放在这里而不是解析器里，是因为解析器还要负责**元数据合并**：同一模型在
+  -- solo_agent 里有思考档位、在 solo_work_lite 里没有，合并必须跨通道进行
+  -- （否则模型显示"未提供推理等级"）。策略只决定"哪些 id 对外露出"。
+  local admit = nil
+  local mrAdmit = plat.models_remote and plat.models_remote.admit_functions
+  if type(mrAdmit) == "table" then
+    admit = {}
+    for _, f in ipairs(mrAdmit) do admit[f] = true end
+  end
   local remote = plugin.state.remoteModels and plugin.state.remoteModels[provider]
   local out, seen = {}, {}
   -- 远端在前（权威顺序）
@@ -3804,9 +3839,24 @@ local function effectiveModels(provider)
   -- ⚠️ 只剔这里记录过的（真正 404 过的），**绝不**拿远端目录反推下架 ——
   -- buddy/qoder 那类平台的远端目录残缺，反推会删掉可用模型。
   local dead = deadModelIds(provider)
+  local metaAll = plugin.state.modelMeta and plugin.state.modelMeta[provider] or {}
   local kept = {}
   for _, id in ipairs(out) do
-    if not dead[id] and not unavailable[id] then kept[#kept+1] = id end
+    local keep = (not dead[id]) and (not unavailable[id])
+    if keep and admit then
+      local e = metaAll[id]
+      -- 有目录元数据 ⇒ 按它声明的通道判；没有元数据（兜底/手工源）⇒ 不拦，
+      -- 因为"目录没说"不等于"不可调用"。
+      if type(e) == "table" and type(e.chans) == "table" then
+        keep = false
+        for _, c in ipairs(e.chans) do
+          if admit[c] then keep = true break end
+        end
+      elseif type(e) == "table" and type(e.chan) == "string" and e.chan ~= "" then
+        keep = admit[e.chan] == true
+      end
+    end
+    if keep then kept[#kept+1] = id end
   end
   return kept
 end
@@ -4103,22 +4153,20 @@ local function parseRemoteModels(kind, body, provider)
     local groups = rec.function_configs or rec.functionConfigs
     if type(groups) == "table" then
       local byId, chosenRank, order = {}, {}, {}
+      -- chansOf[id]：该 id 在**哪些通道**里出现过（合并只留一条元数据，但
+      -- "在哪些通道可发"是策略判定要用的信息 —— admit_functions 不能只看
+      -- 合并后那条的 chan：同模型常在有档位的 solo_agent 与我们要发的
+      -- solo_work_lite 同时出现，合并会选前者，导致误判"不可发"）。
+      local chansOf = {}
       for _, g in ipairs(groups) do
         if type(g) == "table" then
           local chan = rstr(g, "function", "Function")
           -- 准入：未声明 function 或不在白名单 → 整组丢弃
-          -- ★ 追加一道「本适配器可发通道」闸门（声明式，见 models_remote.admit_functions）：
-          --   白名单只说明"这个通道在本适配器的推理端点下可调用"，不代表
-          --   **适配器会发它** —— trae 适配器恒发 solo_work_lite，别的通道的
-          --   模型即使可调用，经我们这条路发出去也会空回/回落默认模型。
-          local admitted = nil
-          do
-            local pl = platformById(provider)
-            local mr2 = pl and pl.models_remote
-            local af = mr2 and mr2.admit_functions
-            if type(af) == "table" then admitted = {} for _, f in ipairs(af) do admitted[f] = true end end
-          end
-          if admitted and chan and not admitted[chan] then chan = nil end
+          --
+          -- ⚠️ 「白名单」只回答"该通道在本适配器的推理端点下**可调用**"；
+          --    "适配器会不会发这条通道"是另一回事，由 effectiveModels 的
+          --    models_remote.admit_functions 过滤（那是产品策略，不该写进解析器：
+          --    解析器的职责是把目录如实解出来，含元数据合并）。
           if chan and rankOf[chan] then
             local list = g.config_info_list or g.ConfigInfoList
             if type(list) == "table" then
@@ -4134,6 +4182,8 @@ local function parseRemoteModels(kind, body, provider)
                     -- is_custom_model: 仅可见但不可调用（上游流内 4001 拒绝）
                     if e.custom == true then ok = false end
                     if ok then
+                      chansOf[e.id] = chansOf[e.id] or {}
+                      chansOf[e.id][chan] = true
                       local inc = byId[e.id]
                       if inc == nil then
                         byId[e.id] = e
@@ -4169,7 +4219,14 @@ local function parseRemoteModels(kind, body, provider)
         --   上层只能显示"未提供推理等级"）。
         if not plugin.state.modelMeta then plugin.state.modelMeta = {} end
         plugin.state.modelMeta[provider] = plugin.state.modelMeta[provider] or {}
-        plugin.state.modelMeta[provider][id] = byId[id]
+        local entry = byId[id]
+        if type(entry) == "table" and chansOf[id] then
+          local list = {}
+          for c in pairs(chansOf[id]) do list[#list+1] = c end
+          table.sort(list)
+          entry.chans = list
+        end
+        plugin.state.modelMeta[provider][id] = entry
       end
     end
 
@@ -4588,6 +4645,9 @@ local function syncProviderSource(provider)
   if plat.endpoint then src.endpoint = plat.endpoint end
   if plat.endpoint_stream then src.endpoint_stream = plat.endpoint_stream end
     if plat.headers_extra then src.headers = plat.headers_extra end
+  -- 声明式上游重试策略（见平台上的 retry_policy 注释）：内核只按 status +
+  -- body 子串匹配，不认识任何厂商。
+  if type(plat.retry_policy) == "table" then src.retry = plat.retry_policy end
     -- ★ 把**设备身份**随源带给适配器：有些平台的头不是简单 Bearer，
     --   需要 uid / device_id / machine_id 派生（trae 的 X-Uid / X-Device-Id /
     --   X-Machine-Id）。适配器沙箱里**读不到凭据**，只能靠 meta 传。
@@ -9083,14 +9143,42 @@ end
 function plugin.list_platforms(req)
   local out = {}
   for _, p in ipairs(allPlatforms()) do
+    -- ★ logged_in 必须看**账号池**，不能只看旧的单账号键。
+    --
+    -- 真实缺陷（2026-10-20 用户报「codearts 还是不可用」）：这里原本
+    -- `credentialOf("channels:" .. id)` —— 那是**旧版单账号**的保险库键；
+    -- 现网凭据键是 `channels:<platform>:<accountId>`（一平台多账号），
+    -- 于是**所有**通过账号池接入的平台都被判成未登录（buddy 之所以显示已登录，
+    -- 是因为它还留着一条旧格式凭据）。UI 据此把渠道卡片渲染成"未接入"，
+    -- 用户看到的就是"渠道不可用"，而底层模型其实完全能用。
+    local logged, first, claimed = false, nil, nil
+    for _, a in ipairs(poolList(p.id)) do
+      if a.enabled ~= false and credentialOf(a.credentialRef) ~= nil then
+        logged = true
+        if first == nil then first = a end
+        if claimed == nil and a.last_claim ~= nil then claimed = a.last_claim end
+      end
+    end
+    -- 兼容旧单账号：池里没有时回落到 state.accounts + 旧凭据键
     local acct = accountOf(p.id) or {}
-    local has = credentialOf("channels:" .. p.id)
+    local hasLegacy = credentialOf("channels:" .. p.id) ~= nil
+    if not logged and hasLegacy then logged = true end
+    if first == nil and (hasLegacy or acct.account ~= nil) then
+      first = { id = acct.id, nickname = acct.account, enabled = acct.enabled }
+    end
     out[#out + 1] = {
       id = p.id, name = p.name, flow = p.flow,
-      logged_in = has ~= nil,
-      account = acct.account,
-      enabled = acct.enabled,
-      last_claim = acct.last_claim,
+      logged_in = logged,
+      -- 账号展示：池里第一个可用账号优先（id 是 12 位 hex，UI 用来区分同平台多账号）
+      account_id = first and first.id or nil,
+      account = (first and first.nickname) or acct.account,
+      enabled = first and first.enabled ~= false or acct.enabled,
+      last_claim = claimed or acct.last_claim,
+      accounts = (function()
+        local n = 0
+        for _, a in ipairs(poolList(p.id)) do if a.enabled ~= false then n = n + 1 end end
+        return n
+      end)(),
     }
   end
   return { status = 200, json = { platforms = out } }
@@ -9429,8 +9517,32 @@ end
 
 function plugin.status_page(req)
   local r = __llmsproxy_kernel.call("status", {})
+  -- accounts 必须**合并账号池**：只回 state.accounts（旧单账号表）时，
+  -- 通过账号池接入的平台在这里是空的，UI 的状态页于是显示"没有账号"，
+  -- 与 platforms 的 logged_in 一样会让人误判成"渠道不可用"
+  -- （同一根因的两个出口，2026-10-20 一起修）。
+  local accounts = {}
+  for k, v in pairs(plugin.state.accounts or {}) do accounts[k] = v end
+  for _, p in ipairs(allPlatforms()) do
+    local list = {}
+    for _, a in ipairs(poolList(p.id)) do
+      list[#list + 1] = {
+        id = a.id, nickname = a.nickname, enabled = a.enabled ~= false,
+        expiresAt = a.expiresAt, last_claim = a.last_claim,
+        has_credential = credentialOf(a.credentialRef) ~= nil,
+      }
+    end
+    if #list > 0 then
+      local base = accounts[p.id] or {}
+      local merged = {}
+      for k, v in pairs(base) do merged[k] = v end
+      merged.accounts = list
+      merged.count = #list
+      accounts[p.id] = merged
+    end
+  end
   return { status = 200, json = {
-    accounts = plugin.state.accounts,
+    accounts = accounts,
     log = plugin.state.log,
     kernel_ready = r and r.ready or false,
   } }
@@ -10037,7 +10149,21 @@ end
 -- build_headers：内核按源注入 meta{url,method,body,api_key,...}。
 -- 凭据是完整 JSON（登录时存的就是它），从中解出 AK/SK/ST。
 function adapter.build_headers(meta)
-  local h = { ["Content-Type"] = "application/json" }
+  -- ★★ Connection: close 是**必须**的，不是优化。
+  --
+  -- CodeArts 后端按**账户**限制并发会话数（3 个），而它把"会话"绑定在
+  -- HTTP 连接上：内核的 Go transport 会保留空闲连接（默认每 host 2 条）
+  -- 用于 keep-alive，于是第 3~4 个请求就被判成"并发会话数已达上限(3个)"
+  -- （TM.00001041），用户看到的是 codeart 连续不可用。
+  --
+  -- 实证（2026-10-20）：
+  --   * 走网关连续 5 次 → #1/#2/#3 成功，#4/#5 全部 TM.00001041；
+  --   * 同一凭据、每请求**新连接 + Connection: close** 连续 5 次 → 5/5 成功；
+  --   * 之后连续流式也一样：3 次成功后开始 400。
+  -- 即"会话"就是连接，关掉连接会话立刻释放。
+  --
+  -- 代价是每次多一次 TCP/TLS 握手（~百毫秒级），换"渠道真的能用"，值得。
+  local h = { ["Content-Type"] = "application/json", ["Connection"] = "close" }
   local raw = tostring(meta.api_key or "")
   local cred = nil
   if raw:sub(1, 1) == "{" then
@@ -10055,6 +10181,19 @@ function adapter.build_headers(meta)
     return h
   end
   for k, v in pairs(signed) do h[k] = v end
+  -- ★★ Session-Id 是**必须**的，不是可选项 —— 它决定"并发会话数"怎么算。
+  --
+  -- 实测（2026-10-20，对照参考实现 llm-adapter.ts:1168 `headers.set('Session-Id', …)`）：
+  -- 不发送会话号时，后端把**每个请求**当成一个新会话；而会话在响应结束后还要
+  -- 存活一段时间才释放，于是连续 3 个请求就把账户的「并发会话数上限(3个)」占满，
+  -- 之后所有请求（含流式）稳定回 TM.00001041 / 200+空流（用户看到 empty stream）。
+  -- 发一个**稳定**的会话号（同一账号内恒定），后端复用同一会话 ⇒ 不再累加。
+  --
+  -- 会话号取 AK 的 sha256 前 32 hex：稳定、可复现、不引入需要持久化的状态。
+  local ak = tostring(cred.access_key_id or cred.access_key or "")
+  if ak ~= "" then
+    h["Session-Id"] = string.sub(sha256_hex(ak), 1, 32)
+  end
   return h
 end
 
@@ -13126,6 +13265,17 @@ function plugin.__list_sources_probe()
   return { json = { sources = out } }
 end
 
+-- plugin.__platforms_probe：只给判据用 —— 原样返回 `platforms` 路由的数据。
+--
+-- 为什么需要它：`list_platforms` 是 plugin.http 的路由处理器，**不在**
+-- plugin.exports 里（exports 是给 WebUI 直接调用的白名单），判据无法直接
+-- Call 到它。走探针是仓库既有做法（见 channels_remove_source_perm_test.go
+-- 对 `status` 的同类处理），避免为了测试把只读状态处理器塞进 exports。
+function plugin.__platforms_probe(args)
+  local r = plugin.list_platforms(nil) or {}
+  return { json = r.json or {} }
+end
+
 -- plugin.__trae_headers_probe：只给判据用 —— 返回 trae 两套头各自的键集合。
 --
 -- 存在理由：2026-10-20 事故是「目录刷新用了签到头（traeCheckinHeaders）而不是

internal/provider/provider.go

@@ -1156,7 +1156,7 @@ func (p *Provider) Chat(ctx context.Context, req *types.ChatRequest) (*types.Uni
 	if err != nil {
 		return nil, err
 	}
-	raw, status, err := p.do(ctx, chatURL, body, hdrs)
+	raw, status, err := p.doWithRetry(ctx, chatURL, body, hdrs)
 	if err != nil {
 		// a client disconnect or cancelled context is neither a success nor
 		// a failure for scheduling purposes — only upstream errors count
@@ -1227,8 +1227,48 @@ func (p *Provider) ChatStream(ctx context.Context, req *types.ChatRequest) (<-ch
 	}
 	rc := make(chan respOrErr, 1)
 	go func() {
-		resp, err := p.doRawStream(ctx, streamURL, body, hdrs)
-		rc <- respOrErr{resp, err}
+		// Retry only the HANDSHAKE: a policy-matched rejection (e.g. a
+		// per-account concurrency cap answered with a business 4xx) can clear
+		// within seconds, and nothing has been sent to the client yet — the
+		// kernel holds the first chunk back. Once a 200 arrives and streaming
+		// starts, no retry happens (that would duplicate output).
+		rp := p.cfg.Retry
+		attempts := 1
+		if rp != nil && rp.MaxAttempts > 1 {
+			attempts = rp.MaxAttempts
+		}
+		for i := 0; i < attempts; i++ {
+			resp, err := p.doRawStream(ctx, streamURL, body, hdrs)
+			if err != nil {
+				rc <- respOrErr{resp, err}
+				return
+			}
+			if resp.StatusCode == 200 {
+				rc <- respOrErr{resp, nil}
+				return
+			}
+			// A rejection can only be classified after the body is read: the
+			// policy matches on body substrings, and a source may use the same
+			// status (400) for unrelated errors that must NOT be retried.
+			raw, _ := io.ReadAll(resp.Body)
+			resp.Body.Close()
+			if !rp.ShouldRetry(resp.StatusCode, string(raw)) {
+				// Not the retryable body: hand the rejection back verbatim so
+				// the caller reports the real upstream error.
+				resp2 := &http.Response{StatusCode: resp.StatusCode, Body: io.NopCloser(strings.NewReader(string(raw)))}
+				rc <- respOrErr{resp2, nil}
+				return
+			}
+			if i == attempts-1 {
+				resp2 := &http.Response{StatusCode: resp.StatusCode, Body: io.NopCloser(strings.NewReader(string(raw)))}
+				rc <- respOrErr{resp2, nil}
+				return
+			}
+			if serr := sleepCtx(ctx, rp.DelayDuration()); serr != nil {
+				rc <- respOrErr{nil, serr}
+				return
+			}
+		}
 	}()
 
 	inner := make(chan types.UnifiedChunk, 64)
@@ -1560,6 +1600,50 @@ func (p *Provider) do(ctx context.Context, url, body string, hdr http.Header) (s
 	return string(raw), resp.StatusCode, nil
 }
 
+// doWithRetry runs one non-stream request, retrying per the source's
+// declarative RetryPolicy. The policy is pure data (status list + body
+// substrings), so the kernel stays vendor-agnostic: a provider that answers a
+// per-account concurrency cap with a business 4xx can clear by itself while the
+// client just waits a few seconds instead of seeing an error.
+func (p *Provider) doWithRetry(ctx context.Context, url, body string, hdr http.Header) (string, int, error) {
+	rp := p.cfg.Retry
+	attempts := 1
+	if rp != nil && rp.MaxAttempts > 1 {
+		attempts = rp.MaxAttempts
+	}
+	var raw string
+	var status int
+	for i := 0; i < attempts; i++ {
+		r, st, err := p.do(ctx, url, body, hdr)
+		if err != nil {
+			return "", 0, err
+		}
+		raw, status = r, st
+		if status == 200 || !rp.ShouldRetry(status, raw) || i == attempts-1 {
+			break
+		}
+		if serr := sleepCtx(ctx, rp.DelayDuration()); serr != nil {
+			return "", 0, serr
+		}
+	}
+	return raw, status, nil
+}
+
+// sleepCtx sleeps for d unless the request context ends first.
+func sleepCtx(ctx context.Context, d time.Duration) error {
+	if d <= 0 {
+		return ctx.Err()
+	}
+	t := time.NewTimer(d)
+	defer t.Stop()
+	select {
+	case <-ctx.Done():
+		return ctx.Err()
+	case <-t.C:
+		return nil
+	}
+}
+
 func (p *Provider) doRaw(ctx context.Context, url, body string, hdr http.Header) (*http.Response, error) {
 	httpReq, err := http.NewRequestWithContext(ctx, http.MethodPost, url, bytes.NewReader([]byte(body)))
 	if err != nil {

internal/provider/retry_policy_test.go

@@ -0,0 +1,131 @@
+package provider
+
+import (
+	"context"
+	"fmt"
+	"net/http"
+	"net/http/httptest"
+	"sync/atomic"
+	"testing"
+
+	"llmsproxy/internal/config"
+	"llmsproxy/internal/types"
+)
+
+// 上游重试是**内核的通用机制**，判据纯数据（status + body 子串），
+// 目的是让"账号级限流、等一会儿就好"这类拒绝不冒到客户端。
+//
+// 真实事故（2026-10-20）：CodeArts 账户并发会话上限 3 个，连续第 3~4 个请求
+// 回 400 TM.00001041，最后一个请求结束后约 44~60 秒才释放；流式更糟 ——
+// 上游用 HTTP 200 + error 帧表达拒绝，内核只能报 `empty stream`。
+// 参考实现的处理是每 10s 重试一次 chat 直到放行，本测试钉住同一语义。
+func TestChatRetriesDeclaredUpstreamRejection(t *testing.T) {
+	var hits int32
+	up := httptest.NewServer(http.HandlerFunc(func(w http.ResponseWriter, r *http.Request) {
+		n := atomic.AddInt32(&hits, 1)
+		if n <= 2 {
+			w.WriteHeader(http.StatusBadRequest)
+			fmt.Fprint(w, `{"error_code":"TM.00001041","error_msg":"并发会话数已达上限(3个)"}`)
+			return
+		}
+		fmt.Fprint(w, `{"choices":[{"message":{"content":"hi"},"finish_reason":"stop"}]}`)
+	}))
+	defer up.Close()
+
+	s := src("codearts-like", up.URL, "openai", "m1")
+	s.Retry = &config.RetryPolicy{
+		OnStatus:       []int{400},
+		OnBodyContains: []string{"TM.00001041"},
+		Delay:          "1ms",
+		MaxAttempts:    4,
+	}
+	p := newTestProvider(t, s)
+	resp, err := p.Chat(context.Background(), &types.ChatRequest{
+		Model:    "m1",
+		Messages: []types.ChatMessage{{Role: "user", Content: types.StringContent("hi")}},
+	})
+	if err != nil {
+		t.Fatalf("命中重试策略后应成功，实得错误: %v", err)
+	}
+	if resp.Content != "hi" {
+		t.Fatalf("content = %q", resp.Content)
+	}
+	if got := atomic.LoadInt32(&hits); got != 3 {
+		t.Fatalf("应恰好尝试 3 次（2 次失败 + 1 次成功），实得 %d", got)
+	}
+}
+
+// 同一状态码但 body 不匹配 ⇒ **不许重试**（400 也常用于真正的请求错误，
+// 无差别重试只会把错误延迟 3 分钟才暴露给用户）。
+func TestChatDoesNotRetryUnmatchedBody(t *testing.T) {
+	var hits int32
+	up := httptest.NewServer(http.HandlerFunc(func(w http.ResponseWriter, r *http.Request) {
+		atomic.AddInt32(&hits, 1)
+		w.WriteHeader(http.StatusBadRequest)
+		fmt.Fprint(w, `{"error_code":"TM.00001005","error_msg":"无正常可用套餐"}`)
+	}))
+	defer up.Close()
+
+	s := src("codearts-like", up.URL, "openai", "m1")
+	s.Retry = &config.RetryPolicy{
+		OnStatus:       []int{400},
+		OnBodyContains: []string{"TM.00001041"},
+		Delay:          "1ms",
+		MaxAttempts:    5,
+	}
+	p := newTestProvider(t, s)
+	_, err := p.Chat(context.Background(), &types.ChatRequest{
+		Model:    "m1",
+		Messages: []types.ChatMessage{{Role: "user", Content: types.StringContent("hi")}},
+	})
+	if err == nil {
+		t.Fatal("不可重试的 body 必须失败")
+	}
+	if got := atomic.LoadInt32(&hits); got != 1 {
+		t.Fatalf("body 不匹配时只能尝试 1 次，实得 %d", got)
+	}
+}
+
+// 流式：只重试**握手**。命中策略 → 重试直到 200 才开始派发；一旦开始流式
+// 就不再重试（重复输出比报错更糟）。
+func TestChatStreamRetriesHandshakeOnly(t *testing.T) {
+	var hits int32
+	up := httptest.NewServer(http.HandlerFunc(func(w http.ResponseWriter, r *http.Request) {
+		n := atomic.AddInt32(&hits, 1)
+		if n == 1 {
+			w.WriteHeader(http.StatusBadRequest)
+			fmt.Fprint(w, `{"error_code":"TM.00001041","error_msg":"并发会话数已达上限(3个)"}`)
+			return
+		}
+		w.Header().Set("Content-Type", "text/event-stream")
+		fmt.Fprint(w, "data: {\"choices\":[{\"delta\":{\"content\":\"hi\"},\"finish_reason\":\"stop\"}]}\n\n")
+		fmt.Fprint(w, "data: [DONE]\n\n")
+	}))
+	defer up.Close()
+
+	s := src("codearts-like", up.URL, "openai", "m1")
+	s.Retry = &config.RetryPolicy{
+		OnStatus:       []int{400},
+		OnBodyContains: []string{"TM.00001041"},
+		Delay:          "1ms",
+		MaxAttempts:    4,
+	}
+	p := newTestProvider(t, s)
+	ch, err := p.ChatStream(context.Background(), &types.ChatRequest{
+		Model:    "m1",
+		Messages: []types.ChatMessage{{Role: "user", Content: types.StringContent("hi")}},
+	})
+	if err != nil {
+		t.Fatalf("握手重试后应成功: %v", err)
+	}
+	var content string
+	for ck := range ch {
+		content += ck.Content
+	}
+	if content != "hi" {
+		t.Fatalf("content = %q", content)
+	}
+	if got := atomic.LoadInt32(&hits); got != 2 {
+		t.Fatalf("应握手重试 1 次（共 2 次请求），实得 %d", got)
+	}
+}